Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
IQM vs XLK
IQM vs XLK Comparison
Open Charts IQM vs XLK
Franklin Intelligent Machines ETF
Price$67.74
Change-$1.01 (-1.47%)
Volume$935
Net Assets30.47M
The Technology Select Sector SPDR® ETF
Price$229.34
Change+$0.06 (+0.03%)
Volume$5.69M
Net Assets71.07B
IQM vs XLK Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
IQM vs. XLK commentary
May 23, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IQM is a Buy and XLK is a StrongBuy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
XLK has more net assets: 71.1B vs. IQM (30.5M). IQM has a higher annual dividend yield than XLK: IQM (1.330) vs XLK (-1.195). IQM was incepted earlier than XLK: IQM (5 years) vs XLK (26 years). XLK (0.08) has a lower expense ratio than IQM (0.50). XLK has a higher turnover IQM (11.93) vs IQM (11.93).
| IQM | XLK | IQM / XLK | |
| Gain YTD | 1.330 | -1.195 | -111% |
| Net Assets | 30.5M | 71.1B | 0% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.50 | 0.08 | 625% |
| Turnover | 11.93 | 19.00 | 63% |
| Yield | 0.00 | 0.74 | - |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 26 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| XLK | |
|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 83% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 80% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 84% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | N/A |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 81% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 87% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 88% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 83% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 76% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 87% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
IQM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IQM has been closely correlated with VRT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IQM jumps, then VRT could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IQM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IQM | 100% | N/A | ||
| VRT - IQM | 79% Closely correlated | N/A | ||
| MPWR - IQM | 79% Closely correlated | -0.95% | ||
| ANET - IQM | 79% Closely correlated | +0.14% | ||
| CLS - IQM | 75% Closely correlated | N/A | ||
| GEV - IQM | 73% Closely correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||
XLK and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, XLK has been closely correlated with LRCX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 83% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if XLK jumps, then LRCX could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To XLK | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| XLK | 100% | +0.03% | ||
| LRCX - XLK | 83% Closely correlated | -0.28% | ||
| KLAC - XLK | 82% Closely correlated | N/A | ||
| MPWR - XLK | 81% Closely correlated | -0.95% | ||
| CDNS - XLK | 80% Closely correlated | -0.29% | ||
| AMAT - XLK | 80% Closely correlated | +0.28% | ||
More | ||||