IROHU
Price
$9.50
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Sep 25 closing price
Capitalization
N/A
Intraday Buy/Sell Signals
SVII
Price
$13.85
Change
-$0.26 (-1.84%)
Updated
Oct 17 closing price
Capitalization
136.84M
Intraday Buy/Sell Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

IROHU vs SVII

Header iconIROHU vs SVII Comparison
Open Charts IROHU vs SVIIBanner chart's image
Iron Horse Acquisitions
Price$9.50
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$527
CapitalizationN/A
Spring Valley Acquisition
Price$13.85
Change-$0.26 (-1.84%)
Volume$104.42K
Capitalization136.84M
IROHU vs SVII Comparison Chart in %
IROHU
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SVII
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
IROHU vs. SVII commentary
Oct 18, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IROHU is a Hold and SVII is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 18, 2025
Stock price -- (IROHU: $9.50 vs. SVII: $13.85)
Brand notoriety: IROHU and SVII are both not notable
Both companies represent the Financial Conglomerates industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: IROHU: 138% vs. SVII: 127%
Market capitalization -- IROHU: $0 vs. SVII: $136.84M
IROHU [@Financial Conglomerates] is valued at $0. SVII’s [@Financial Conglomerates] market capitalization is $136.84M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Financial Conglomerates] industry ranges from $590.24B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Financial Conglomerates] industry is $181.29M.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

IROHU’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSVII’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • IROHU’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • SVII’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, SVII is a better buy in the long-term than IROHU.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

IROHU’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SVII’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • IROHU’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 1 bearish.
  • SVII’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 1 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SVII is a better buy in the short-term than IROHU.

Price Growth

IROHU (@Financial Conglomerates) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while SVII (@Financial Conglomerates) price change was +11.78% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Financial Conglomerates industry was +0.63%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +65.56%, and the average quarterly price growth was +72.15%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Financial Conglomerates (+0.63% weekly)

Financial conglomerates usually encompass a wide range of financial services including (not necessarily limited to) investment banking, insurance, capital raising/underwriting, trading of financial securities, investment advisory services, wealth management of high net-worth individuals, and retail banking. Think Citigroup, American Express Company, ING Group.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SVII YTD gains are higher at: 23.002 vs. IROHU (-10.208). SVII has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -727.09K vs. IROHU (-2.18M). SVII has more cash in the bank: 158K vs. IROHU (25.2K). SVII has less debt than IROHU: SVII (1.5M) vs IROHU (2.34M). IROHU (0) and SVII (0) have equivalent revenues.
IROHUSVIIIROHU / SVII
CapitalizationN/A137M-
EBITDA-2.18M-727.09K300%
Gain YTD-10.20823.002-44%
P/E RatioN/A125.91-
Revenue00-
Total Cash25.2K158K16%
Total Debt2.34M1.5M156%
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
IROHUSVII
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
38%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
32%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
27%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
36%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
15%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
34%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
12%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
33%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
12%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
18%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
2%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
11%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
8%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
IROHU
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SVII
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
KAOOY8.350.22
+2.71%
Kao Corp.
AMDWF9.65N/A
N/A
Amada Co. Ltd.
DYFSF0.10N/A
N/A
Dynacert Inc
CBUTD0.03N/A
N/A
CLEAR BLUE TECHNOLOGIES INTL INC.
BROGF5.00N/A
N/A
Brooge Energy Limited