Advertisement
IRT vs MRT
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IRT is a Hold and MRT is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
IRT’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileMRT’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- IRT’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- MRT’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
IRT’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MRT’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- IRT’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
- MRT’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 7 bearish.
Price Growth
IRT (@Real Estate Investment Trusts) experienced а -3.57% price change this week, while MRT (@Packaged Software) price change was -10.99% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Real Estate Investment Trusts industry was -1.91%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.21%, and the average quarterly price growth was -0.14%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was -5.14%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.59%, and the average quarterly price growth was +1.53%.
Reported Earning Dates
IRT is expected to report earnings on Oct 22, 2025.
MRT is expected to report earnings on Apr 29, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Real Estate Investment Trusts (-1.91% weekly)A real estate investment trust (REIT) is a company any that owns, and in most cases, operates, income-producing real estate – ranging from office and apartment buildings to warehouses, hospitals, shopping centers, hotels and timberlands. Some REITs are involved in financing real estate. Equity REITs invest in and own properties, while mortgage REITs own and invest in property mortgages. REITs are required by law to pay out at least 90% of their annual taxable income (excluding capital gains) to shareholders in the form of dividends. Some REITs could be more cyclical than others; for example, when an economy is undergoing a recession, hotel REITs could be more vulnerable, compared to say healthcare REIT given that healthcare needs are less likely to depend on economic cycles. American Tower Corporation, Prologis, Inc. and Crown Castle International Corp are some of the biggest REIT companies in the U.S.
@Packaged Software (-5.14% weekly)Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.
| IRT | MRT | IRT / MRT | |
| Capitalization | 3.52B | 39.8M | 8,849% |
| EBITDA | 291M | N/A | - |
| Gain YTD | -14.058 | -28.319 | 50% |
| P/E Ratio | 58.16 | N/A | - |
| Revenue | 661M | N/A | - |
| Total Cash | 22.9M | 3.97M | 577% |
| Total Debt | 2.55B | 28.4M | 8,975% |
IRT | MRT | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 63 | 97 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 75 Overvalued | 6 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 61 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 88 | 100 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 78 | 64 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 29 | 100 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
MRT's Valuation (6) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is significantly better than the same rating for IRT (75). This means that MRT’s stock grew significantly faster than IRT’s over the last 12 months.
IRT's Profit vs Risk Rating (61) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MRT (100). This means that IRT’s stock grew somewhat faster than MRT’s over the last 12 months.
IRT's SMR Rating (88) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as MRT (100). This means that IRT’s stock grew similarly to MRT’s over the last 12 months.
MRT's Price Growth Rating (64) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as IRT (78). This means that MRT’s stock grew similarly to IRT’s over the last 12 months.
IRT's P/E Growth Rating (29) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is significantly better than the same rating for MRT (100). This means that IRT’s stock grew significantly faster than MRT’s over the last 12 months.
| IRT | MRT | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 75% | 3 days ago 75% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 71% | 3 days ago 51% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 49% | 3 days ago 57% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 52% | 3 days ago 43% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 58% | 3 days ago 61% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 59% | 3 days ago 64% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 18 days ago 68% | 10 days ago 73% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 59% | 6 days ago 80% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 63% | 3 days ago 69% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 59% | 3 days ago 73% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| SQCBX | 13.45 | -0.05 | -0.37% |
| X-Square Balanced Fund, LLC C | |||
| EAALX | 22.10 | -0.21 | -0.94% |
| Eaton Vance Atlanta Capital Focused Gr A | |||
| SPMJX | 5.89 | -0.08 | -1.34% |
| Invesco SteelPath MLP Alpha Plus R | |||
| MASKX | 23.86 | -0.49 | -2.01% |
| iShares Russell 2000 Small-Cap Idx Instl | |||
| JACCX | 39.83 | -0.94 | -2.31% |
| Janus Henderson Forty C | |||
IRT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IRT has been closely correlated with UDR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 86% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IRT jumps, then UDR could also see price increases.
MRT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that MRT and APPS have been poorly correlated (+31% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MRT and APPS's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MRT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MRT | 100% | +1.67% | ||
| APPS - MRT | 31% Poorly correlated | -6.06% | ||
| CSGS - MRT | 31% Poorly correlated | -2.71% | ||
| HCAT - MRT | 30% Poorly correlated | -3.56% | ||
| UBER - MRT | 29% Poorly correlated | -0.96% | ||
| SAP - MRT | 28% Poorly correlated | -1.29% | ||
More | ||||