Advertisement
CSGS vs MRT
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSGS is a Buy and MRT is a Buy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CSGS’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileMRT’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- CSGS’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
- MRT’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CSGS’s TA Score shows that 1 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MRT’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- CSGS’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 2 bearish.
- MRT’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
Price Growth
CSGS (@Packaged Software) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while MRT (@Packaged Software) price change was +3.45% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was -0.63%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.39%, and the average quarterly price growth was +12.11%.
Reported Earning Dates
CSGS is expected to report earnings on Aug 05, 2026.
MRT is expected to report earnings on Oct 09, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Packaged Software (-0.63% weekly)Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.
| CSGS | MRT | CSGS / MRT | |
| Capitalization | 2.3B | 155M | 1,484% |
| EBITDA | 203M | N/A | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.665 | -24.051 | -24% |
| P/E Ratio | 36.02 | N/A | - |
| Revenue | 1.24B | N/A | - |
| Total Cash | 147M | N/A | - |
| Total Debt | 566M | N/A | - |
CSGS | MRT | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 2 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 13 Undervalued | 7 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 26 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 43 | 100 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 51 | 77 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 16 | 100 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
MRT's Valuation (7) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as CSGS (13) in the Data Processing Services industry. This means that MRT’s stock grew similarly to CSGS’s over the last 12 months.
CSGS's Profit vs Risk Rating (26) in the Data Processing Services industry is significantly better than the same rating for MRT (100) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry. This means that CSGS’s stock grew significantly faster than MRT’s over the last 12 months.
CSGS's SMR Rating (43) in the Data Processing Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MRT (100) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry. This means that CSGS’s stock grew somewhat faster than MRT’s over the last 12 months.
CSGS's Price Growth Rating (51) in the Data Processing Services industry is in the same range as MRT (77) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry. This means that CSGS’s stock grew similarly to MRT’s over the last 12 months.
CSGS's P/E Growth Rating (16) in the Data Processing Services industry is significantly better than the same rating for MRT (100) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry. This means that CSGS’s stock grew significantly faster than MRT’s over the last 12 months.
| CSGS | MRT | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 77% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 53% | 2 days ago 53% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 55% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 45% | 2 days ago 46% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 52% | 2 days ago 47% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 51% | 2 days ago 64% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | 21 days ago 77% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 71% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 56% | 2 days ago 74% |
Advertisement
CSGS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CSGS has been loosely correlated with FRSH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 55% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CSGS jumps, then FRSH could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CSGS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CSGS | 100% | N/A | ||
| FRSH - CSGS | 55% Loosely correlated | +0.79% | ||
| DOX - CSGS | 55% Loosely correlated | +0.43% | ||
| MTC - CSGS | 55% Loosely correlated | -9.46% | ||
| RDVT - CSGS | 51% Loosely correlated | -1.55% | ||
| SSNC - CSGS | 49% Loosely correlated | -0.44% | ||
More | ||||
MRT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MRT has been loosely correlated with CYN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 36% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MRT jumps, then CYN could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MRT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MRT | 100% | +2.27% | ||
| CYN - MRT | 36% Loosely correlated | -5.51% | ||
| CSGS - MRT | 31% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| HCAT - MRT | 30% Poorly correlated | -1.44% | ||
| SAP - MRT | 28% Poorly correlated | -3.68% | ||
| PAR - MRT | 27% Poorly correlated | -1.05% | ||
More | ||||