IRT
Price
$16.16
Change
-$0.10 (-0.62%)
Updated
Oct 27 closing price
Capitalization
3.8B
One day until earnings call
Intraday Buy/Sell Signals
UMH
Price
$14.61
Change
-$0.07 (-0.48%)
Updated
Oct 27 closing price
Capitalization
1.25B
6 days until earnings call
Intraday Buy/Sell Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

IRT vs UMH

Header iconIRT vs UMH Comparison
Open Charts IRT vs UMHBanner chart's image
Independence Realty Trust
Price$16.16
Change-$0.10 (-0.62%)
Volume$3.27M
Capitalization3.8B
UMH Properties
Price$14.61
Change-$0.07 (-0.48%)
Volume$348.07K
Capitalization1.25B
IRT vs UMH Comparison Chart in %
IRT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
UMH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
IRT vs. UMH commentary
Oct 28, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IRT is a Hold and UMH is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 28, 2025
Stock price -- (IRT: $16.16 vs. UMH: $14.61)
Brand notoriety: IRT and UMH are both not notable
Both companies represent the Media Conglomerates industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: IRT: 127% vs. UMH: 49%
Market capitalization -- IRT: $3.8B vs. UMH: $1.25B
IRT [@Media Conglomerates] is valued at $3.8B. UMH’s [@Media Conglomerates] market capitalization is $1.25B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Media Conglomerates] industry ranges from $26.97B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Media Conglomerates] industry is $5.39B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

IRT’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileUMH’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • IRT’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • UMH’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, IRT is a better buy in the long-term than UMH.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

IRT’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while UMH’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • IRT’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • UMH’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, UMH is a better buy in the short-term than IRT.

Price Growth

IRT (@Media Conglomerates) experienced а +0.50% price change this week, while UMH (@Media Conglomerates) price change was +0.97% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Media Conglomerates industry was -0.70%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.62%, and the average quarterly price growth was -1.88%.

Reported Earning Dates

IRT is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2025.

UMH is expected to report earnings on Nov 03, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Media Conglomerates (-0.70% weekly)

Companies that operate in these three (or more) areas: broadcasting, cable TV, publishing and movies/entertainment. The companies usually have a large share in these markets. Walt Disney Co . is an example.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IRT($3.8B) has a higher market cap than UMH($1.25B). IRT has higher P/E ratio than UMH: IRT (134.67) vs UMH (104.36). IRT YTD gains are higher at: -16.264 vs. UMH (-19.511). IRT has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 336M vs. UMH (119M). UMH has more cash in the bank: 109M vs. IRT (152K). UMH has less debt than IRT: UMH (659M) vs IRT (2.25B). IRT has higher revenues than UMH: IRT (645M) vs UMH (250M).
IRTUMHIRT / UMH
Capitalization3.8B1.25B305%
EBITDA336M119M282%
Gain YTD-16.264-19.51183%
P/E Ratio134.67104.36129%
Revenue645M250M258%
Total Cash152K109M0%
Total Debt2.25B659M341%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
IRT vs UMH: Fundamental Ratings
IRT
UMH
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5920
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
30
Undervalued
15
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
6874
SMR RATING
1..100
9290
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
7778
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
3484
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

UMH's Valuation (15) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as IRT (30). This means that UMH’s stock grew similarly to IRT’s over the last 12 months.

IRT's Profit vs Risk Rating (68) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as UMH (74). This means that IRT’s stock grew similarly to UMH’s over the last 12 months.

UMH's SMR Rating (90) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as IRT (92). This means that UMH’s stock grew similarly to IRT’s over the last 12 months.

IRT's Price Growth Rating (77) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as UMH (78). This means that IRT’s stock grew similarly to UMH’s over the last 12 months.

IRT's P/E Growth Rating (34) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is somewhat better than the same rating for UMH (84). This means that IRT’s stock grew somewhat faster than UMH’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
IRTUMH
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 28 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
59%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
56%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
61%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
47%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
56%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
70%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
56%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
68%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
64%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
59%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
52%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
66%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
58%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
57%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
58%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
58%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
56%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
IRT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
UMH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ALARX58.66N/A
N/A
Alger Capital Appreciation Instl I
PMBCX36.11N/A
N/A
Principal MidCap C
FACSX53.78N/A
N/A
Nuveen Mid Cap Value Opportunities C
WFGGX32.77N/A
N/A
First Trust WCM Focused Global Gr Inv
LBWAX22.48N/A
N/A
BrandywineGLOBAL Div US Large Value A

IRT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IRT has been closely correlated with UDR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 86% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IRT jumps, then UDR could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To IRT
1D Price
Change %
IRT100%
-0.62%
UDR - IRT
86%
Closely correlated
-0.63%
CPT - IRT
85%
Closely correlated
-0.86%
EQR - IRT
83%
Closely correlated
-0.17%
NXRT - IRT
83%
Closely correlated
-2.95%
AVB - IRT
82%
Closely correlated
-0.56%
More