Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ISCCX vs MIDCX
ISCCX vs MIDCX Comparison
Open Charts ISCCX vs MIDCX
Federated Hermes Intl Small-Mid Co C
Price$32.80
Change-$0.46 (-1.38%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets388.35M
MFS International New Discovery C
Price$29.76
Change-$0.10 (-0.33%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.33B
ISCCX vs MIDCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ISCCX vs. MIDCX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ISCCX is a Hold and MIDCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MIDCX has more cash in the bank: 7.33B vs. ISCCX (388M). MIDCX pays higher dividends than ISCCX: MIDCX (1.40) vs ISCCX (0.91). ISCCX was incepted earlier than MIDCX: ISCCX (30 years) vs MIDCX (25 years). ISCCX (2.30) is less costly to investors than MIDCX (2.06). ISCCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 35.00 vs. MIDCX (15.00). MIDCX has a lower initial minimum investment than ISCCX: MIDCX (1000) vs ISCCX (1500). ISCCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 25.52 vs. MIDCX (3.57). ISCCX return over 5 years is better than : 9.45 vs. MIDCX (-11.10).
| ISCCX | MIDCX | ISCCX / MIDCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.99 | 2.05 | 97% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.30 | 2.06 | 112% |
| Fund Existence | 30 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 26.251 | 12.171 | 216% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 1000 | 150% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 388M | 7.33B | 5% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.91 | 1.40 | 65% |
| Returns for 1 year | 25.52 | 3.57 | 715% |
| Returns for 3 years | 51.52 | 12.60 | 409% |
| Returns for 5 years | 9.45 | -11.10 | -85% |
| Returns for 10 years | 4.08 | 15.14 | 27% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement