Ad is loading...
ISCF vs SCZ
ISCF vs SCZ Comparison
Open Charts ISCF vs SCZ
iShares MSCI Intl Small-Cap Mltfct ETF
Price$33.14
Change-$0.67 (-1.98%)
Volume$56.86K
Net Assets310.88M
iShares MSCI EAFE Small-Cap ETF
Price$62.53
Change-$1.11 (-1.74%)
Volume$912.69K
Net Assets9.03B
ISCF vs SCZ Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ISCF vs. SCZ commentary
Apr 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ISCF is a Hold and SCZ is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SCZ has more net assets: 9.03B vs. ISCF (311M). SCZ has a higher annual dividend yield than ISCF: SCZ (2.930) vs ISCF (2.668). ISCF was incepted earlier than SCZ: ISCF (10 years) vs SCZ (17 years). ISCF (0.23) has a lower expense ratio than SCZ (0.40). SCZ has a higher turnover ISCF (3.79) vs ISCF (3.79).
| ISCF | SCZ | ISCF / SCZ | |
| Gain YTD | 2.668 | 2.930 | 91% |
| Net Assets | 311M | 9.03B | 3% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.23 | 0.40 | 58% |
| Turnover | 3.79 | 14.00 | 27% |
| Yield | 4.12 | 3.35 | 123% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 17 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| ISCF | SCZ | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 84% | 1 day ago 83% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 81% | 1 day ago 83% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 81% | 1 day ago 86% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 79% | 1 day ago 79% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 75% | 1 day ago 77% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 82% | 3 days ago 83% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 79% | 5 days ago 80% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 85% | 1 day ago 75% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 87% | 1 day ago 86% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
ISCF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ISCF has been closely correlated with BNT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 70% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ISCF jumps, then BNT could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ISCF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ISCF | 100% | -1.98% | ||
| BNT - ISCF | 70% Closely correlated | -7.03% | ||
| CXT - ISCF | 66% Loosely correlated | -10.25% | ||
| CE - ISCF | 62% Loosely correlated | -16.58% | ||
| PHM - ISCF | 58% Loosely correlated | -6.31% | ||
| APAM - ISCF | 58% Loosely correlated | -8.01% | ||
More | ||||
SCZ and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SCZ has been closely correlated with MT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 72% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SCZ jumps, then MT could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y