ISPO
Price
$3.60
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Nov 1 closing price
MNLXF
Price
$0.28
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Aug 22 closing price
Ad is loading...

ISPO vs MNLXF

Header iconISPO vs MNLXF Comparison
Open Charts ISPO vs MNLXFBanner chart's image
Inspirato
Price$3.60
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$77
CapitalizationN/A
MiniLuxe Holding
Price$0.28
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$1K
CapitalizationN/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
ISPO vs MNLXF Comparison Chart
Loading...
ISPO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
VS
ISPO vs. MNLXF commentary
Nov 05, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ISPO is a Sell and MNLXF is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 05, 2024
Stock price -- (ISPO: $3.60 vs. MNLXF: $0.28)
Brand notoriety: ISPO and MNLXF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Consumer Services industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ISPO: 0% vs. MNLXF: 100%
Market capitalization -- ISPO: $14.52M vs. MNLXF: $33.3M
ISPO [@Other Consumer Services] is valued at $14.52M. MNLXF’s [@Other Consumer Services] market capitalization is $33.3M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Consumer Services] industry ranges from $121.92B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Consumer Services] industry is $9.2B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ISPO’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileMNLXF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • ISPO’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • MNLXF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, MNLXF is a better buy in the long-term than ISPO.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ISPO’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • ISPO’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.

Price Growth

ISPO (@Other Consumer Services) experienced а -7.22% price change this week, while MNLXF (@Other Consumer Services) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Consumer Services industry was -0.35%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.64%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4.39%.

Reported Earning Dates

ISPO is expected to report earnings on Mar 05, 2024.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Consumer Services (-0.35% weekly)

Other consumer services include companies that provide consumer services, and are not classified elsewhere. Travel fare aggregators, hotel bookings, consumer-to-consumer or business-to-business sales platforms are some examples of services that can be clubbed into this category. Many of such services have expanded online. Booking Holdings Inc, The Priceline Group Inc, and eBay Inc. are some major operators in this segment.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MNLXF($33.3M) has a higher market cap than ISPO($14.5M). ISPO YTD gains are higher at: -2.174 vs. MNLXF (-34.009). ISPO has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 4.26M vs. MNLXF (-4.56M). ISPO has more cash in the bank: 36.6M vs. MNLXF (7.79M). MNLXF has less debt than ISPO: MNLXF (8.94M) vs ISPO (283M). ISPO has higher revenues than MNLXF: ISPO (329M) vs MNLXF (22.3M).
ISPOMNLXFISPO / MNLXF
Capitalization14.5M33.3M44%
EBITDA4.26M-4.56M-93%
Gain YTD-2.174-34.0096%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue329M22.3M1,475%
Total Cash36.6M7.79M470%
Total Debt283M8.94M3,166%
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ISPO
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
64%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
63%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
66%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
76%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
80%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
60%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
80%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
58%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
ISPO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
RNSC29.530.13
+0.43%
First Trust Small Cap US Equity Sel ETF
DDWM34.740.14
+0.40%
WisdomTree Dynamic Ccy Hdgd Intl Eq ETF
USXF49.19N/A
N/A
iShares® ESG Advanced MSCI USA ETF
VNQ94.15N/A
N/A
Vanguard Real Estate ETF
RISN26.75-0.03
-0.11%
Inspire Tactical Balanced ETF

ISPO and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that ISPO and PII have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ISPO and PII's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ISPO
1D Price
Change %
ISPO100%
N/A
PII - ISPO
30%
Poorly correlated
+0.70%
BC - ISPO
30%
Poorly correlated
+1.44%
WGO - ISPO
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HAS - ISPO
27%
Poorly correlated
+0.29%
CUK - ISPO
27%
Poorly correlated
-0.45%
More

MNLXF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MNLXF and ONVC have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MNLXF and ONVC's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MNLXF
1D Price
Change %
MNLXF100%
N/A
ONVC - MNLXF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SDRMF - MNLXF
17%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TRNR - MNLXF
4%
Poorly correlated
-1.70%
ISPO - MNLXF
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
IVP - MNLXF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More