Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ITBAX vs PDBZX
ITBAX vs PDBZX Comparison
Open Charts ITBAX vs PDBZX
Hartford Total Return Bond A
Price$9.38
Change+$0.01 (+0.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets4.54B
PGIM Total Return Bond Z
Price$12.27
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets52.15B
ITBAX vs PDBZX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ITBAX vs. PDBZX commentary
Oct 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ITBAX is a Hold and PDBZX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PDBZX has more cash in the bank: 52.2B vs. ITBAX (4.55B). PDBZX pays higher dividends than ITBAX: PDBZX (4.56) vs ITBAX (3.91). ITBAX was incepted earlier than PDBZX: ITBAX (29 years) vs PDBZX (29 years). ITBAX (0.68) is less costly to investors than PDBZX (0.50). PDBZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 113.00 vs. ITBAX (47.00). PDBZX has a lower initial minimum investment than ITBAX: PDBZX (0) vs ITBAX (2000). PDBZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.03 vs. ITBAX (6.34). PDBZX return over 5 years is better than : 1.56 vs. ITBAX (-1.81).
| ITBAX | PDBZX | ITBAX / PDBZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.68 | 0.49 | 139% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.68 | 0.50 | 136% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 29 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.037 | 7.477 | 94% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.55B | 52.2B | 9% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.91 | 4.56 | 86% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.34 | 7.03 | 90% |
| Returns for 3 years | 21.85 | 22.78 | 96% |
| Returns for 5 years | -1.81 | 1.56 | -116% |
| Returns for 10 years | 21.93 | 23.83 | 92% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers