ITMSF
Price
$2.31
Change
+$0.12 (+5.48%)
Updated
Aug 28 closing price
Capitalization
139.35M
81 days until earnings call
WRDLY
Price
$1.60
Change
-$0.03 (-1.84%)
Updated
Aug 28 closing price
Capitalization
950.4M
Interact to see
Advertisement

ITMSF vs WRDLY

Header iconITMSF vs WRDLY Comparison
Open Charts ITMSF vs WRDLYBanner chart's image
Intermap Technologies
Price$2.31
Change+$0.12 (+5.48%)
Volume$65K
Capitalization139.35M
Worldline SA
Price$1.60
Change-$0.03 (-1.84%)
Volume$3.59K
Capitalization950.4M
ITMSF vs WRDLY Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
ITMSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WRDLY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ITMSF vs. WRDLY commentary
Aug 30, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ITMSF is a Buy and WRDLY is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 30, 2025
Stock price -- (ITMSF: $2.31 vs. WRDLY: $1.60)
Brand notoriety: ITMSF and WRDLY are both not notable
ITMSF represents the Packaged Software, while WRDLY is part of the Computer Communications industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ITMSF: 40% vs. WRDLY: 26%
Market capitalization -- ITMSF: $139.35M vs. WRDLY: $950.4M
ITMSF [@Packaged Software] is valued at $139.35M. WRDLY’s [@Computer Communications] market capitalization is $950.4M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $320.59B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Computer Communications] industry ranges from $3.79T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $9.09B. The average market capitalization across the [@Computer Communications] industry is $26.46B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ITMSF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileWRDLY’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • ITMSF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • WRDLY’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, ITMSF is a better buy in the long-term than WRDLY.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ITMSF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WRDLY’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ITMSF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • WRDLY’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, WRDLY is a better buy in the short-term than ITMSF.

Price Growth

ITMSF (@Packaged Software) experienced а +6.45% price change this week, while WRDLY (@Computer Communications) price change was -5.88% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was -0.45%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.17%, and the average quarterly price growth was +22.65%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Computer Communications industry was -0.40%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.33%, and the average quarterly price growth was +36.12%.

Reported Earning Dates

ITMSF is expected to report earnings on Nov 18, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Packaged Software (-0.45% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

@Computer Communications (-0.40% weekly)

Computer communications industry develops technology that allows computing devices to exchange data with each other using connections/data links between nodes. Common types of computer network include Cloud (IAN), Internet, Wide (WAN, Local (LAN)/Wireless(WLAN) etc. The industry is an ever-more important part of technology, and is set to become even bigger as the Internet of Things (IoT) rapidly forays into the various aspects of our lives. Cisco Systems, Inc., Palo Alto Networks, Inc. and Arista Networks, Inc., Fortinet, Inc. are some of the major computer communications companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
WRDLY($950M) has a higher market cap than ITMSF($139M). ITMSF YTD gains are higher at: 36.686 vs. WRDLY (-62.353). ITMSF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 3.33M vs. WRDLY (-3.79B). WRDLY has more cash in the bank: 1.85B vs. ITMSF (7.4M). ITMSF has less debt than WRDLY: ITMSF (1.04M) vs WRDLY (4.34B). WRDLY has higher revenues than ITMSF: WRDLY (4.55B) vs ITMSF (20.2M).
ITMSFWRDLYITMSF / WRDLY
Capitalization139M950M15%
EBITDA3.33M-3.79B-0%
Gain YTD36.686-62.353-59%
P/E Ratio115.00N/A-
Revenue20.2M4.55B0%
Total Cash7.4M1.85B0%
Total Debt1.04M4.34B0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ITMSF vs WRDLY: Fundamental Ratings
ITMSF
WRDLY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1211
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
81
Overvalued
49
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
31100
SMR RATING
1..100
100100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3794
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

WRDLY's Valuation (49) in the null industry is in the same range as ITMSF (81). This means that WRDLY’s stock grew similarly to ITMSF’s over the last 12 months.

ITMSF's Profit vs Risk Rating (31) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for WRDLY (100). This means that ITMSF’s stock grew significantly faster than WRDLY’s over the last 12 months.

ITMSF's SMR Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as WRDLY (100). This means that ITMSF’s stock grew similarly to WRDLY’s over the last 12 months.

ITMSF's Price Growth Rating (37) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for WRDLY (94). This means that ITMSF’s stock grew somewhat faster than WRDLY’s over the last 12 months.

ITMSF's P/E Growth Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as WRDLY (100). This means that ITMSF’s stock grew similarly to WRDLY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ITMSFWRDLY
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
57%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
78%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
57%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
80%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
40%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ITMSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WRDLY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SDVGX17.45N/A
N/A
Sit Dividend Growth I
WEUSX14.51N/A
N/A
SEI World Equity Ex-US A (SIIT)
IMEGX22.46N/A
N/A
Macquarie Systematic Em Mkts Eq R6
TANDX38.29N/A
N/A
Castle Tandem No-Load
PRASX19.37N/A
N/A
T. Rowe Price New Asia

ITMSF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that ITMSF and WWLNF have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ITMSF and WWLNF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ITMSF
1D Price
Change %
ITMSF100%
+5.38%
WWLNF - ITMSF
28%
Poorly correlated
N/A
WRDLY - ITMSF
25%
Poorly correlated
-1.84%
TTWO - ITMSF
22%
Poorly correlated
+1.24%
PCOR - ITMSF
21%
Poorly correlated
+3.08%
ETWO - ITMSF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

WRDLY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, WRDLY has been loosely correlated with FALC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 41% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if WRDLY jumps, then FALC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To WRDLY
1D Price
Change %
WRDLY100%
-1.84%
FALC - WRDLY
41%
Loosely correlated
-1.60%
NEXXY - WRDLY
38%
Loosely correlated
N/A
ADYEY - WRDLY
35%
Loosely correlated
+0.66%
SDGR - WRDLY
33%
Loosely correlated
-0.15%
UPBD - WRDLY
31%
Poorly correlated
-0.81%
More