Advertisement
ITMSF vs WRDLY
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ITMSF is a Hold and WRDLY is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
ITMSF’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileWRDLY’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- ITMSF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
- WRDLY’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
ITMSF’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WRDLY’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- ITMSF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
- WRDLY’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
Price Growth
ITMSF (@Packaged Software) experienced а -6.91% price change this week, while WRDLY (@Packaged Software) price change was +1.12% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was -1.04%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.36%, and the average quarterly price growth was +1.77%.
Reported Earning Dates
ITMSF is expected to report earnings on Aug 18, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Packaged Software (-1.04% weekly)Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.
| ITMSF | WRDLY | ITMSF / WRDLY | |
| Capitalization | 18.8M | 3.31B | 1% |
| EBITDA | -3.22M | 768M | -0% |
| Gain YTD | 35.503 | -57.412 | -62% |
| P/E Ratio | N/A | 12.87 | - |
| Revenue | 6.73M | 4.02B | 0% |
| Total Cash | 311K | 1.17B | 0% |
| Total Debt | 1.07M | 5.05B | 0% |
ITMSF | WRDLY | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 79 | 51 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 71 Overvalued | 45 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 26 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 16 | 98 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 35 | 93 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 9 | 99 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
WRDLY's Valuation (45) in the null industry is in the same range as ITMSF (71). This means that WRDLY’s stock grew similarly to ITMSF’s over the last 12 months.
ITMSF's Profit vs Risk Rating (26) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for WRDLY (100). This means that ITMSF’s stock grew significantly faster than WRDLY’s over the last 12 months.
ITMSF's SMR Rating (16) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for WRDLY (98). This means that ITMSF’s stock grew significantly faster than WRDLY’s over the last 12 months.
ITMSF's Price Growth Rating (35) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for WRDLY (93). This means that ITMSF’s stock grew somewhat faster than WRDLY’s over the last 12 months.
ITMSF's P/E Growth Rating (9) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for WRDLY (99). This means that ITMSF’s stock grew significantly faster than WRDLY’s over the last 12 months.
| ITMSF | WRDLY | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 88% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 61% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 73% | 1 day ago 79% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 84% | 1 day ago 80% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 88% | 1 day ago 59% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 82% | 1 day ago 77% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 81% | 1 day ago 57% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 87% | 7 days ago 79% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 89% | 1 day ago 70% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 86% | 1 day ago 46% |
Advertisement
ITMSF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that ITMSF and WWLNF have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ITMSF and WWLNF's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ITMSF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ITMSF | 100% | -0.87% | ||
| WWLNF - ITMSF | 28% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| WRDLY - ITMSF | 25% Poorly correlated | +0.56% | ||
| TTWO - ITMSF | 22% Poorly correlated | -0.32% | ||
| PCOR - ITMSF | 21% Poorly correlated | +1.04% | ||
| ETWO - ITMSF | 21% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||
WRDLY and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, WRDLY has been loosely correlated with FALC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 41% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if WRDLY jumps, then FALC could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To WRDLY | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| WRDLY | 100% | +0.56% | ||
| FALC - WRDLY | 41% Loosely correlated | -23.64% | ||
| NEXXY - WRDLY | 38% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| ADYEY - WRDLY | 35% Loosely correlated | +2.14% | ||
| SDGR - WRDLY | 33% Loosely correlated | +0.16% | ||
| UPBD - WRDLY | 31% Poorly correlated | +0.64% | ||
More | ||||