Advertisement
ITMSF vs WRDLY
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ITMSF is a Hold and WRDLY is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
ITMSF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileWRDLY’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- ITMSF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- WRDLY’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
ITMSF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WRDLY’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- ITMSF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
- WRDLY’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
ITMSF (@Packaged Software) experienced а +1.21% price change this week, while WRDLY (@Computer Communications) price change was -12.12% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was -5.18%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -9.43%, and the average quarterly price growth was +47.08%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Computer Communications industry was -7.49%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -11.95%, and the average quarterly price growth was +28.84%.
Reported Earning Dates
ITMSF is expected to report earnings on Mar 26, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Packaged Software (-5.18% weekly)Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.
@Computer Communications (-7.49% weekly)Computer communications industry develops technology that allows computing devices to exchange data with each other using connections/data links between nodes. Common types of computer network include Cloud (IAN), Internet, Wide (WAN, Local (LAN)/Wireless(WLAN) etc. The industry is an ever-more important part of technology, and is set to become even bigger as the Internet of Things (IoT) rapidly forays into the various aspects of our lives. Cisco Systems, Inc., Palo Alto Networks, Inc. and Arista Networks, Inc., Fortinet, Inc. are some of the major computer communications companies.
| ITMSF | WRDLY | ITMSF / WRDLY | |
| Capitalization | 121M | 577M | 21% |
| EBITDA | 2.04M | -3.79B | -0% |
| Gain YTD | 1.178 | -76.842 | -2% |
| P/E Ratio | 86.00 | N/A | - |
| Revenue | 19.7M | 4.55B | 0% |
| Total Cash | 7.79M | 1.85B | 0% |
| Total Debt | 906K | 4.34B | 0% |
ITMSF | WRDLY | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 67 | 90 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 75 Overvalued | 50 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 45 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 33 | 97 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 61 | 94 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 4 | 99 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 85 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
WRDLY's Valuation (50) in the null industry is in the same range as ITMSF (75). This means that WRDLY’s stock grew similarly to ITMSF’s over the last 12 months.
ITMSF's Profit vs Risk Rating (45) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for WRDLY (100). This means that ITMSF’s stock grew somewhat faster than WRDLY’s over the last 12 months.
ITMSF's SMR Rating (33) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for WRDLY (97). This means that ITMSF’s stock grew somewhat faster than WRDLY’s over the last 12 months.
ITMSF's Price Growth Rating (61) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for WRDLY (94). This means that ITMSF’s stock grew somewhat faster than WRDLY’s over the last 12 months.
ITMSF's P/E Growth Rating (4) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for WRDLY (99). This means that ITMSF’s stock grew significantly faster than WRDLY’s over the last 12 months.
| ITMSF | WRDLY | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 66% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 71% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 82% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 85% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 79% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 79% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 27 days ago 83% | 9 days ago 56% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 86% | 7 days ago 80% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 55% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 75% |
Advertisement
ITMSF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that ITMSF and WWLNF have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ITMSF and WWLNF's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ITMSF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ITMSF | 100% | +2.39% | ||
| WWLNF - ITMSF | 28% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| WRDLY - ITMSF | 25% Poorly correlated | +3.78% | ||
| TTWO - ITMSF | 22% Poorly correlated | +2.36% | ||
| PCOR - ITMSF | 21% Poorly correlated | +0.63% | ||
| LPSN - ITMSF | 20% Poorly correlated | -4.84% | ||
More | ||||
WRDLY and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, WRDLY has been loosely correlated with FALC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 41% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if WRDLY jumps, then FALC could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To WRDLY | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| WRDLY | 100% | +3.78% | ||
| FALC - WRDLY | 41% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| NEXXY - WRDLY | 38% Loosely correlated | -4.39% | ||
| ADYEY - WRDLY | 35% Loosely correlated | -2.86% | ||
| SDGR - WRDLY | 33% Loosely correlated | -2.52% | ||
| UPBD - WRDLY | 31% Poorly correlated | -1.82% | ||
More | ||||