ITMSF
Price
$2.31
Change
+$0.12 (+5.48%)
Updated
Aug 28 closing price
Capitalization
139.35M
81 days until earnings call
WWLNF
Price
$3.50
Change
-$0.98 (-21.88%)
Updated
Aug 11 closing price
Capitalization
950.4M
Interact to see
Advertisement

ITMSF vs WWLNF

Header iconITMSF vs WWLNF Comparison
Open Charts ITMSF vs WWLNFBanner chart's image
Intermap Technologies
Price$2.31
Change+$0.12 (+5.48%)
Volume$65K
Capitalization139.35M
Worldline SA
Price$3.50
Change-$0.98 (-21.88%)
Volume$900
Capitalization950.4M
ITMSF vs WWLNF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
ITMSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WWLNF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ITMSF vs. WWLNF commentary
Aug 30, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ITMSF is a Buy and WWLNF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 30, 2025
Stock price -- (ITMSF: $2.31 vs. WWLNF: $3.50)
Brand notoriety: ITMSF and WWLNF are both not notable
ITMSF represents the Packaged Software, while WWLNF is part of the Computer Communications industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ITMSF: 40% vs. WWLNF: 25%
Market capitalization -- ITMSF: $139.35M vs. WWLNF: $950.4M
ITMSF [@Packaged Software] is valued at $139.35M. WWLNF’s [@Computer Communications] market capitalization is $950.4M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $320.59B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Computer Communications] industry ranges from $3.79T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $9.09B. The average market capitalization across the [@Computer Communications] industry is $26.46B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ITMSF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileWWLNF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • ITMSF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • WWLNF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, ITMSF is a better buy in the long-term than WWLNF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ITMSF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WWLNF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ITMSF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • WWLNF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 0 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, WWLNF is a better buy in the short-term than ITMSF.

Price Growth

ITMSF (@Packaged Software) experienced а +6.45% price change this week, while WWLNF (@Computer Communications) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was -0.45%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.17%, and the average quarterly price growth was +22.65%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Computer Communications industry was -0.40%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.33%, and the average quarterly price growth was +36.12%.

Reported Earning Dates

ITMSF is expected to report earnings on Nov 18, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Packaged Software (-0.45% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

@Computer Communications (-0.40% weekly)

Computer communications industry develops technology that allows computing devices to exchange data with each other using connections/data links between nodes. Common types of computer network include Cloud (IAN), Internet, Wide (WAN, Local (LAN)/Wireless(WLAN) etc. The industry is an ever-more important part of technology, and is set to become even bigger as the Internet of Things (IoT) rapidly forays into the various aspects of our lives. Cisco Systems, Inc., Palo Alto Networks, Inc. and Arista Networks, Inc., Fortinet, Inc. are some of the major computer communications companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
WWLNF($950M) has a higher market cap than ITMSF($139M). ITMSF YTD gains are higher at: 36.686 vs. WWLNF (-61.111). ITMSF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 3.33M vs. WWLNF (-3.79B). WWLNF has more cash in the bank: 1.85B vs. ITMSF (7.4M). ITMSF has less debt than WWLNF: ITMSF (1.04M) vs WWLNF (4.34B). WWLNF has higher revenues than ITMSF: WWLNF (4.55B) vs ITMSF (20.2M).
ITMSFWWLNFITMSF / WWLNF
Capitalization139M950M15%
EBITDA3.33M-3.79B-0%
Gain YTD36.686-61.111-60%
P/E Ratio115.00N/A-
Revenue20.2M4.55B0%
Total Cash7.4M1.85B0%
Total Debt1.04M4.34B0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ITMSF vs WWLNF: Fundamental Ratings
ITMSF
WWLNF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1237
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
81
Overvalued
68
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
31100
SMR RATING
1..100
100100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3795
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5025

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

WWLNF's Valuation (68) in the null industry is in the same range as ITMSF (81). This means that WWLNF’s stock grew similarly to ITMSF’s over the last 12 months.

ITMSF's Profit vs Risk Rating (31) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for WWLNF (100). This means that ITMSF’s stock grew significantly faster than WWLNF’s over the last 12 months.

ITMSF's SMR Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as WWLNF (100). This means that ITMSF’s stock grew similarly to WWLNF’s over the last 12 months.

ITMSF's Price Growth Rating (37) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for WWLNF (95). This means that ITMSF’s stock grew somewhat faster than WWLNF’s over the last 12 months.

ITMSF's P/E Growth Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as WWLNF (100). This means that ITMSF’s stock grew similarly to WWLNF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ITMSFWWLNF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
48%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
85%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
51%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
36%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
30%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
47%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
82%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
86%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
28%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ITMSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WWLNF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SDVSX17.31N/A
N/A
Sit Dividend Growth S
IPOCX17.10N/A
N/A
Macquarie Systematic Em Mkts Eq C
TSMDX15.95N/A
N/A
Trillium ESG Small/Mid Cap Institutional
TRZNX19.27N/A
N/A
T. Rowe Price New Asia Z
JEMWX37.08N/A
N/A
JPMorgan Emerging Markets Equity R6

ITMSF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that ITMSF and WWLNF have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ITMSF and WWLNF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ITMSF
1D Price
Change %
ITMSF100%
+5.38%
WWLNF - ITMSF
28%
Poorly correlated
N/A
WRDLY - ITMSF
25%
Poorly correlated
-1.84%
TTWO - ITMSF
22%
Poorly correlated
+1.24%
PCOR - ITMSF
21%
Poorly correlated
+3.08%
ETWO - ITMSF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

WWLNF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, WWLNF has been loosely correlated with NEXXY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 44% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if WWLNF jumps, then NEXXY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To WWLNF
1D Price
Change %
WWLNF100%
N/A
NEXXY - WWLNF
44%
Loosely correlated
N/A
FALC - WWLNF
37%
Loosely correlated
-1.60%
DYNDF - WWLNF
29%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ITMSF - WWLNF
28%
Poorly correlated
+5.38%
AFRM - WWLNF
25%
Poorly correlated
+3.09%
More