ITMSF vs WWLNF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ITMSF is a Hold and WWLNF is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
ITMSF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileWWLNF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- ITMSF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- WWLNF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
ITMSF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WWLNF’s TA Score has 1 bullish TA indicator(s).
- ITMSF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
- WWLNF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 3 bearish.
Price Growth
ITMSF (@Packaged Software) experienced а +4.21% price change this week, while WWLNF (@Packaged Software) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was +2.15%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.00%, and the average quarterly price growth was +16.71%.
Reported Earning Dates
ITMSF is expected to report earnings on Nov 14, 2024.
Industries' Descriptions
@Packaged Software (+2.15% weekly)Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.
| ITMSF | WWLNF | ITMSF / WWLNF | |
| Capitalization | 18.8M | 11.2B | 0% |
| EBITDA | -3.22M | 907M | -0% |
| Gain YTD | -4.734 | 0.444 | -1,065% |
| P/E Ratio | N/A | 42.02 | - |
| Revenue | 6.73M | 4.59B | 0% |
| Total Cash | 311K | 1.42B | 0% |
| Total Debt | 1.07M | 3.58B | 0% |
ITMSF | WWLNF | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 96 Overvalued | 57 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 14 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 100 | 95 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 34 | 55 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 29 | 80 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
WWLNF's Valuation (57) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ITMSF (96). This means that WWLNF’s stock grew somewhat faster than ITMSF’s over the last 12 months.
ITMSF's Profit vs Risk Rating (14) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for WWLNF (100). This means that ITMSF’s stock grew significantly faster than WWLNF’s over the last 12 months.
WWLNF's SMR Rating (95) in the null industry is in the same range as ITMSF (100). This means that WWLNF’s stock grew similarly to ITMSF’s over the last 12 months.
ITMSF's Price Growth Rating (34) in the null industry is in the same range as WWLNF (55). This means that ITMSF’s stock grew similarly to WWLNF’s over the last 12 months.
ITMSF's P/E Growth Rating (29) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for WWLNF (80). This means that ITMSF’s stock grew somewhat faster than WWLNF’s over the last 12 months.
| ITMSF | WWLNF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 12 days ago 84% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 12 days ago 90% | 12 days ago 48% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 12 days ago 90% | N/A |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 12 days ago 84% | 12 days ago 61% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 12 days ago 88% | 12 days ago 40% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 12 days ago 82% | 12 days ago 41% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 17 days ago 81% | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 12 days ago 87% | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 12 days ago 90% | 12 days ago 38% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 12 days ago 87% | 12 days ago 39% |
ITMSF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that ITMSF and WWLNF have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ITMSF and WWLNF's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ITMSF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ITMSF | 100% | -0.06% | ||
| WWLNF - ITMSF | 28% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| WRDLY - ITMSF | 25% Poorly correlated | -1.41% | ||
| TTWO - ITMSF | 22% Poorly correlated | +1.66% | ||
| PCOR - ITMSF | 21% Poorly correlated | -1.45% | ||
| ETWO - ITMSF | 21% Poorly correlated | -0.39% | ||
More | ||||
WWLNF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, WWLNF has been loosely correlated with NEXXY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 44% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if WWLNF jumps, then NEXXY could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To WWLNF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| WWLNF | 100% | N/A | ||
| NEXXY - WWLNF | 44% Loosely correlated | -16.42% | ||
| FALC - WWLNF | 37% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| DYNDF - WWLNF | 29% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| ITMSF - WWLNF | 28% Poorly correlated | -0.06% | ||
| AFRM - WWLNF | 25% Poorly correlated | -0.02% | ||
More | ||||