ITP
Price
$0.26
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Oct 8, 12:32 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
4.39M
UPMKF
Price
$27.84
Change
-$1.02 (-3.53%)
Updated
Oct 2 closing price
Capitalization
13.8B
Interact to see
Advertisement

ITP vs UPMKF

Header iconITP vs UPMKF Comparison
Open Charts ITP vs UPMKFBanner chart's image
IT Tech Packaging
Price$0.26
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$3K
Capitalization4.39M
UPM-Kymmene
Price$27.84
Change-$1.02 (-3.53%)
Volume$19.17K
Capitalization13.8B
ITP vs UPMKF Comparison Chart in %
ITP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
UPMKF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ITP vs. UPMKF commentary
Oct 08, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ITP is a Hold and UPMKF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 08, 2025
Stock price -- (ITP: $0.26 vs. UPMKF: $27.84)
Brand notoriety: ITP and UPMKF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Pulp & Paper industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ITP: 7% vs. UPMKF: 29%
Market capitalization -- ITP: $4.39M vs. UPMKF: $13.8B
ITP [@Pulp & Paper] is valued at $4.39M. UPMKF’s [@Pulp & Paper] market capitalization is $13.8B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Pulp & Paper] industry ranges from $13.8B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Pulp & Paper] industry is $4.42B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ITP’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileUPMKF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • ITP’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • UPMKF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, UPMKF is a better buy in the long-term than ITP.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ITP’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while UPMKF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ITP’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • UPMKF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, UPMKF is a better buy in the short-term than ITP.

Price Growth

ITP (@Pulp & Paper) experienced а -10.35% price change this week, while UPMKF (@Pulp & Paper) price change was -3.52% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Pulp & Paper industry was -3.17%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.24%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4.94%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Pulp & Paper (-3.17% weekly)

The pulp and paper industry includes companies that make pulp and process pulp into paper and specialty paper products. Companies in this industry also operate paper mills. The industry’s products have wide array of markets including books, magazines, envelopes, containerboard, and food and beverage packaging. Domtar Corporation, Schweitzer-Mauduit International, Inc. and Neenah Inc. are some of the major pulp & paper companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
UPMKF($13.8B) has a higher market cap than ITP($4.39M). UPMKF YTD gains are higher at: 4.610 vs. ITP (-56.934). UPMKF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.6B vs. ITP (4.06M). UPMKF has more cash in the bank: 740M vs. ITP (6.47M). ITP has less debt than UPMKF: ITP (10.2M) vs UPMKF (4.07B). UPMKF has higher revenues than ITP: UPMKF (10.2B) vs ITP (78.4M).
ITPUPMKFITP / UPMKF
Capitalization4.39M13.8B0%
EBITDA4.06M1.6B0%
Gain YTD-56.9344.610-1,235%
P/E RatioN/A36.58-
Revenue78.4M10.2B1%
Total Cash6.47M740M1%
Total Debt10.2M4.07B0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ITP vs UPMKF: Fundamental Ratings
ITP
UPMKF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8436
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
64
Fair valued
13
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
9488
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4458
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9810
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

UPMKF's Valuation (13) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ITP (64) in the Pulp And Paper industry. This means that UPMKF’s stock grew somewhat faster than ITP’s over the last 12 months.

UPMKF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as ITP (100) in the Pulp And Paper industry. This means that UPMKF’s stock grew similarly to ITP’s over the last 12 months.

UPMKF's SMR Rating (88) in the null industry is in the same range as ITP (94) in the Pulp And Paper industry. This means that UPMKF’s stock grew similarly to ITP’s over the last 12 months.

ITP's Price Growth Rating (44) in the Pulp And Paper industry is in the same range as UPMKF (58) in the null industry. This means that ITP’s stock grew similarly to UPMKF’s over the last 12 months.

UPMKF's P/E Growth Rating (10) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for ITP (98) in the Pulp And Paper industry. This means that UPMKF’s stock grew significantly faster than ITP’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ITPUPMKF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
52%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
60%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
61%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
84%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
57%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
55%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
77%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
57%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 16 days ago
58%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
66%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
79%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
56%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ITP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
UPMKF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ALITF17.00N/A
N/A
ALLIANCE WITAN PLC
FDL43.51-0.03
-0.07%
First Trust Morningstar Div Leaders ETF
JHS11.77-0.03
-0.25%
John Hancock Income Securities Trust Capital Stock
USSG61.77-0.44
-0.70%
Xtrackers MSCI USA Selection Eq ETF
XPP30.20-0.72
-2.33%
ProShares Ultra FTSE China 50

ITP and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that ITP and UPMKF have been poorly correlated (+10% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ITP and UPMKF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ITP
1D Price
Change %
ITP100%
+0.82%
UPMKF - ITP
10%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CFPUF - ITP
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BLRDY - ITP
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
LMPMF - ITP
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SEOAY - ITP
6%
Poorly correlated
-1.69%
More

UPMKF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, UPMKF has been loosely correlated with UPMMY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 36% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if UPMKF jumps, then UPMMY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To UPMKF
1D Price
Change %
UPMKF100%
N/A
UPMMY - UPMKF
36%
Loosely correlated
-1.93%
SEOAY - UPMKF
26%
Poorly correlated
-1.69%
MNODF - UPMKF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SUZ - UPMKF
10%
Poorly correlated
-2.24%
ITP - UPMKF
10%
Poorly correlated
+0.82%
More