IVE
Price
$235.32
Change
+$2.07 (+0.89%)
Updated
Sep 11 closing price
Net Assets
49.92B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
VFLO
Price
$53.88
Change
+$0.32 (+0.60%)
Updated
Sep 11 closing price
Net Assets
11.09B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

IVE vs VFLO

IVE vs VFLO Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
A.I.Advisor
Sep 01, 2026

Which ETF would AI Choose? iShares S&P 500 Value ETF (IVE) vs. VictoryShares Free Cash Flow ETF (VFLO)

Key Takeaways

  • IVE offers broad passive exposure to large-capitalization U.S. value stocks through the S&P 500 Value Index, while VFLO employs a rules-based strategy targeting approximately 50 companies with high free cash flow yields and growth characteristics.
  • IVE maintains lower costs with an expense ratio of 0.18% compared to VFLO's 0.39%, making the former more cost-efficient for long-term investors.
  • IVE provides greater diversification with roughly 440 holdings, whereas VFLO is more concentrated, potentially increasing idiosyncratic risk but allowing targeted exposure to free cash flow leaders.
  • Sector allocations differ notably: IVE reflects a traditional large-cap value profile with meaningful weight in financials and information technology, while VFLO tilts toward information technology, energy, and health care.
  • Both ETFs pursue value-oriented strategies but through distinct methodologies—index replication versus free cash flow screening—resulting in different risk-return profiles suited to varying investor preferences for breadth versus focus.
  • In the current market environment, IVE emphasizes established large-cap stability, while VFLO positions for companies demonstrating strong cash generation amid economic uncertainty.

Introduction

Investors seeking value exposure within U.S. equities often evaluate multiple approaches to balance cost, diversification, and return drivers. IVE and VFLO represent two distinct strategies targeting similar investor goals of capital appreciation through undervalued or cash-generative companies. They do not compete directly as identical products but offer alternative pathways: one through broad index tracking and the other through a specialized factor-based screen. This comparison highlights structural differences that help investors align choices with portfolio objectives in evolving market conditions.

iShares S&P 500 Value ETF (IVE) Overview

IVE is a passively managed exchange-traded fund that seeks to track the S&P 500 Value Index. The index selects large-capitalization U.S. equities exhibiting value characteristics based on metrics such as book value, earnings, and sales. The fund typically holds approximately 440 securities, providing diversified exposure across the large-cap value segment. Top holdings generally include major companies in information technology and other sectors, though weights remain modest due to the broad mandate. Sector allocations feature significant representation in financials, information technology, health care, and industrials. With an expense ratio of 0.18%, IVE employs full replication of its benchmark and rebalances in line with index changes. This structure supports liquidity and transparency for investors prioritizing cost efficiency and market-cap-weighted value exposure.

VictoryShares Free Cash Flow ETF (VFLO) Overview

VFLO is a passively managed exchange-traded fund that seeks to track the Victory U.S. Large Cap Free Cash Flow Index. The rules-based index selects approximately 50 large- and mid-cap U.S. companies with high projected free cash flow yields, incorporating a growth filter to exclude low-growth names. Holdings are more concentrated than traditional value benchmarks, emphasizing firms with strong cash generation potential. Sector allocations often show elevated weights in information technology, energy, and health care. The fund carries an expense ratio of 0.39% and follows a quarterly rebalancing schedule aligned with index methodology. This approach delivers targeted exposure to free cash flow metrics while maintaining a passive framework, distinguishing it through its focus on profitability and cash flow dynamics rather than traditional valuation multiples alone.

Industry and Thematic Backdrop

The large-cap value segment operates within a macroeconomic environment shaped by interest rate expectations, corporate earnings cycles, and sector rotation trends. Value strategies generally benefit from environments favoring established companies with stable cash flows amid moderating growth or higher borrowing costs. Regulatory developments around corporate taxation and capital allocation influence holdings across both funds. Broader capital flows into factor-based and thematic ETFs continue to support liquidity in value-oriented products. Risks include potential underperformance during prolonged growth rallies and sensitivity to commodity price fluctuations in energy-weighted allocations. These dynamics create a backdrop where diversified index approaches and concentrated cash-flow screens each address different aspects of value investing.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

Over recent market cycles, IVE has delivered returns consistent with broad large-cap value benchmarks, benefiting from sector rotations into financials and traditional value areas during periods of economic stabilization. VFLO has shown differentiated behavior tied to free cash flow leaders, with positioning that can amplify gains in environments rewarding cash-generative firms in technology and energy. Volatility profiles differ due to concentration levels, with the more focused strategy potentially exhibiting greater dispersion around benchmark moves. Relative positioning reflects trade-offs between the stability of wide diversification and the potential for outperformance through active factor selection in varying interest rate and earnings regimes.

AI Screener

Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization, technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener helps identify trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening. Explore opportunities with the AI Screener.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable structural factors, Tickeron’s AI would currently assign a higher probability of preference to IVE for investors prioritizing cost efficiency, broad diversification, and established liquidity within the large-cap value space. The lower expense ratio and extensive holdings provide a durable foundation for long-term positioning, while VFLO offers compelling differentiation through its free cash flow focus for those seeking concentrated exposure. Selection ultimately depends on individual risk tolerance and allocation goals.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
IVE vs. VFLO commentary
Sep 13, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IVE is a Hold and VFLO is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IVE has more net assets: 49.9B vs. VFLO (11.1B). VFLO has a higher annual dividend yield than IVE: VFLO (37.720) vs IVE (11.401). IVE was incepted earlier than VFLO: IVE (26 years) vs VFLO (3 years). IVE (0.18) has a lower expense ratio than VFLO (0.39). VFLO has a higher turnover IVE (28.00) vs IVE (28.00).
IVEVFLOIVE / VFLO
Gain YTD11.40137.72030%
Net Assets49.9B11.1B450%
Total Expense Ratio0.180.3946%
Turnover28.00142.0020%
Yield1.501.01148%
Fund Existence26 years3 years-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
IVEVFLO
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
72%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
69%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
67%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
74%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
86%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
85%
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
88%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
69%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
82%
View a ticker or compare two or three
IVE
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
VFLO
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interact to see
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TMSL41.900.33
+0.79%
T. Rowe Price Small-Mid Cap ETF
DJUL51.150.24
+0.47%
FT Vest US Equity Deep Bffr ETF Jul
SUPL46.100.10
+0.23%
ProShares Supply Chain Logistics ETF
XSEP45.130.02
+0.04%
FT Vest U.S. Eq Enh & ModBufETF-Sep
FSZ79.09-0.27
-0.34%
First Trust Switzerland AlphaDEX® ETF

IVE and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IVE has been loosely correlated with SWK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 65% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if IVE jumps, then SWK could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To IVE
1D Price
Change %
IVE100%
+0.89%
SWK - IVE
65%
Loosely correlated
+0.01%
EMR - IVE
63%
Loosely correlated
+2.57%
IR - IVE
62%
Loosely correlated
-0.22%
CFG - IVE
62%
Loosely correlated
+1.22%
BLK - IVE
61%
Loosely correlated
+1.62%
More

VFLO and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, VFLO has been loosely correlated with ABNB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 58% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if VFLO jumps, then ABNB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To VFLO
1D Price
Change %
VFLO100%
+0.60%
ABNB - VFLO
58%
Loosely correlated
+1.52%
ALGN - VFLO
54%
Loosely correlated
+0.07%
DOCU - VFLO
52%
Loosely correlated
-0.23%
NTAP - VFLO
50%
Loosely correlated
+8.54%
PAYX - VFLO
50%
Loosely correlated
+0.54%
More