IVF
Price
$1.57
Change
-$0.18 (-10.29%)
Updated
Aug 15 closing price
Capitalization
1.46M
SSKN
Price
$1.82
Change
+$0.01 (+0.55%)
Updated
Aug 15 closing price
Capitalization
7.59M
Interact to see
Advertisement

IVF vs SSKN

Header iconIVF vs SSKN Comparison
Open Charts IVF vs SSKNBanner chart's image
INVO Fertility
Price$1.57
Change-$0.18 (-10.29%)
Volume$791.11K
Capitalization1.46M
Strata Skin Sciences
Price$1.82
Change+$0.01 (+0.55%)
Volume$5.53K
Capitalization7.59M
IVF vs SSKN Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
IVF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SSKN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
IVF vs. SSKN commentary
Aug 16, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IVF is a Hold and SSKN is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 16, 2025
Stock price -- (IVF: $1.57 vs. SSKN: $1.82)
Brand notoriety: IVF and SSKN are both not notable
Both companies represent the Medical/Nursing Services industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: IVF: 39% vs. SSKN: 12%
Market capitalization -- IVF: $1.46M vs. SSKN: $7.59M
IVF [@Medical/Nursing Services] is valued at $1.46M. SSKN’s [@Medical/Nursing Services] market capitalization is $7.59M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Medical/Nursing Services] industry ranges from $229.31B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Medical/Nursing Services] industry is $5.58B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

IVF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSSKN’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • IVF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • SSKN’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, IVF is a better buy in the long-term than SSKN.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

IVF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SSKN’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • IVF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • SSKN’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SSKN is a better buy in the short-term than IVF.

Price Growth

IVF (@Medical/Nursing Services) experienced а -12.78% price change this week, while SSKN (@Medical/Nursing Services) price change was +2.25% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Medical/Nursing Services industry was +1.37%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.38%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4.58%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Medical/Nursing Services (+1.37% weekly)

The medical/nursing services includes companies that provide medical-related services such as ambulance services, dialysis centers, respiratory therapy, blood testing and rehabilitation services. DaVita Inc., Chemed Corporation and Guardant Health, Inc. are examples of companies in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SSKN($7.59M) has a higher market cap than IVF($1.46M). IVF YTD gains are higher at: -35.391 vs. SSKN (-37.457). SSKN has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -1.98M vs. IVF (-22.81M). SSKN has more cash in the bank: 6.51M vs. IVF (840K). IVF has less debt than SSKN: IVF (8.84M) vs SSKN (16.4M). SSKN has higher revenues than IVF: SSKN (33.6M) vs IVF (6.59M).
IVFSSKNIVF / SSKN
Capitalization1.46M7.59M19%
EBITDA-22.81M-1.98M1,150%
Gain YTD-35.391-37.45794%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue6.59M33.6M20%
Total Cash840K6.51M13%
Total Debt8.84M16.4M54%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
IVF vs SSKN: Fundamental Ratings
IVF
SSKN
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8850
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
39
Fair valued
29
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
10099
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6592
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
37100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SSKN's Valuation (29) in the Medical Specialties industry is in the same range as IVF (39) in the null industry. This means that SSKN’s stock grew similarly to IVF’s over the last 12 months.

SSKN's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Medical Specialties industry is in the same range as IVF (100) in the null industry. This means that SSKN’s stock grew similarly to IVF’s over the last 12 months.

SSKN's SMR Rating (99) in the Medical Specialties industry is in the same range as IVF (100) in the null industry. This means that SSKN’s stock grew similarly to IVF’s over the last 12 months.

IVF's Price Growth Rating (65) in the null industry is in the same range as SSKN (92) in the Medical Specialties industry. This means that IVF’s stock grew similarly to SSKN’s over the last 12 months.

IVF's P/E Growth Rating (37) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SSKN (100) in the Medical Specialties industry. This means that IVF’s stock grew somewhat faster than SSKN’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
IVFSSKN
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
87%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
89%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
88%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
88%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
75%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
78%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
88%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 17 days ago
76%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
84%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
87%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
85%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
86%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
IVF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SSKN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
RXRX5.770.13
+2.30%
Recursion Pharmaceuticals
UHT38.430.03
+0.08%
Universal Health Realty Income Trust
LNT64.62-0.10
-0.15%
Alliant Energy Corp
MGNX1.58-0.04
-2.47%
MacroGenics
SHFS2.60-0.56
-17.59%
SHF Holdings Inc

IVF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IVF has been loosely correlated with VNDA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 40% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if IVF jumps, then VNDA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To IVF
1D Price
Change %
IVF100%
-10.29%
VNDA - IVF
40%
Loosely correlated
-1.58%
ADTX - IVF
31%
Poorly correlated
-0.97%
IVA - IVF
30%
Poorly correlated
+3.32%
RANI - IVF
30%
Poorly correlated
-1.22%
IRD - IVF
27%
Poorly correlated
+1.69%
More

SSKN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SSKN and VERO have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SSKN and VERO's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SSKN
1D Price
Change %
SSKN100%
+0.55%
VERO - SSKN
30%
Poorly correlated
-5.31%
DCTH - SSKN
26%
Poorly correlated
-1.05%
IVF - SSKN
25%
Poorly correlated
-10.29%
ANIK - SSKN
25%
Poorly correlated
+2.20%
ARAY - SSKN
22%
Poorly correlated
-4.11%
More