Ad is loading...
IVP
Price
$0.22
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Nov 22, 03:23 PM (EDT)
MNLXF
Price
$0.30
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Nov 21 closing price
Ad is loading...

IVP vs MNLXF

Header iconIVP vs MNLXF Comparison
Open Charts IVP vs MNLXFBanner chart's image
Inspire Veterinary Partners
Price$0.22
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$2.05K
CapitalizationN/A
MiniLuxe Holding
Price$0.30
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$1K
CapitalizationN/A
IVP vs MNLXF Comparison Chart
Loading...
IVP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
IVP vs. MNLXF commentary
Nov 22, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IVP is a Hold and MNLXF is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 22, 2024
Stock price -- (IVP: $0.22 vs. MNLXF: $0.30)
Brand notoriety: IVP and MNLXF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Consumer Services industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: IVP: 10% vs. MNLXF: 20%
Market capitalization -- IVP: $1.43M vs. MNLXF: $33.3M
IVP [@Other Consumer Services] is valued at $1.43M. MNLXF’s [@Other Consumer Services] market capitalization is $33.3M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Consumer Services] industry ranges from $121.92B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Consumer Services] industry is $9.2B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

IVP’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileMNLXF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • IVP’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • MNLXF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, IVP is a better buy in the long-term than MNLXF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

IVP’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • IVP’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.

Price Growth

IVP (@Other Consumer Services) experienced а -12.75% price change this week, while MNLXF (@Other Consumer Services) price change was +25.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Consumer Services industry was +2.53%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.35%, and the average quarterly price growth was +7.66%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Consumer Services (+2.53% weekly)

Other consumer services include companies that provide consumer services, and are not classified elsewhere. Travel fare aggregators, hotel bookings, consumer-to-consumer or business-to-business sales platforms are some examples of services that can be clubbed into this category. Many of such services have expanded online. Booking Holdings Inc, The Priceline Group Inc, and eBay Inc. are some major operators in this segment.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MNLXF($33.3M) has a higher market cap than IVP($1.43M). MNLXF YTD gains are higher at: -29.295 vs. IVP (-99.373). MNLXF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -4.56M vs. IVP (-8.95M). MNLXF has more cash in the bank: 7.79M vs. IVP (1.96M). MNLXF has less debt than IVP: MNLXF (8.94M) vs IVP (15.6M). MNLXF has higher revenues than IVP: MNLXF (22.3M) vs IVP (16.1M).
IVPMNLXFIVP / MNLXF
Capitalization1.43M33.3M4%
EBITDA-8.95M-4.56M196%
Gain YTD-99.373-29.295339%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue16.1M22.3M72%
Total Cash1.96M7.79M25%
Total Debt15.6M8.94M174%
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
IVP
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 15 days ago
82%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
IVP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
UPW84.062.94
+3.62%
ProShares Ultra Utilities
DWAS100.691.90
+1.92%
Invesco Dorsey Wright SmallCap Momt ETF
VOT265.173.29
+1.26%
Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth ETF
LCR35.760.20
+0.55%
Leuthold Core ETF
TGRW39.460.07
+0.18%
T. Rowe Price Growth Stock ETF

IVP and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that IVP and ISPO have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that IVP and ISPO's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To IVP
1D Price
Change %
IVP100%
-5.96%
ISPO - IVP
21%
Poorly correlated
-5.76%
MOND - IVP
15%
Poorly correlated
+2.07%
TRNR - IVP
4%
Poorly correlated
+11.42%
MNLXF - IVP
-0%
Poorly correlated
+25.00%
TUIFF - IVP
-5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

MNLXF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MNLXF and ONVC have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MNLXF and ONVC's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MNLXF
1D Price
Change %
MNLXF100%
+25.00%
ONVC - MNLXF
24%
Poorly correlated
-14.29%
SDRMF - MNLXF
17%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TRNR - MNLXF
4%
Poorly correlated
+11.42%
ISPO - MNLXF
3%
Poorly correlated
-5.76%
IVP - MNLXF
-0%
Poorly correlated
-5.96%
More