IVP vs MNLXF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IVP is a Hold and MNLXF is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
IVP’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileMNLXF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- IVP’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- MNLXF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
IVP’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MNLXF’s TA Score has 7 bullish TA indicator(s).
- IVP’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
- MNLXF’s TA Score: 7 bullish, 0 bearish.
Price Growth
IVP (@Other Consumer Services) experienced а +4.87% price change this week, while MNLXF (@Other Consumer Services) price change was +16.67% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Consumer Services industry was -0.35%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.62%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.59%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Other Consumer Services (-0.35% weekly)Other consumer services include companies that provide consumer services, and are not classified elsewhere. Travel fare aggregators, hotel bookings, consumer-to-consumer or business-to-business sales platforms are some examples of services that can be clubbed into this category. Many of such services have expanded online. Booking Holdings Inc, The Priceline Group Inc, and eBay Inc. are some major operators in this segment.
| IVP | MNLXF | IVP / MNLXF | |
| Capitalization | 1.43M | 33.3M | 4% |
| EBITDA | -8.95M | -4.56M | 196% |
| Gain YTD | -99.456 | -17.511 | 568% |
| P/E Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Revenue | 16.1M | 22.3M | 72% |
| Total Cash | 1.96M | 7.79M | 25% |
| Total Debt | 15.6M | 8.94M | 174% |
| IVP | MNLXF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 79% | 3 days ago 50% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 69% | 3 days ago 60% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 72% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 69% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 80% | 3 days ago 58% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 62% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 79% | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 40% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | N/A |
IVP and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that IVP and ISPO have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that IVP and ISPO's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IVP | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IVP | 100% | +0.27% | ||
| ISPO - IVP | 21% Poorly correlated | -1.75% | ||
| TRNR - IVP | 5% Poorly correlated | -5.50% | ||
| MNLXF - IVP | -0% Poorly correlated | +40.00% | ||
| TUIFF - IVP | -5% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| SDRMF - IVP | -11% Poorly correlated | N/A |
MNLXF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that MNLXF and ONVC have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MNLXF and ONVC's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MNLXF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MNLXF | 100% | +40.00% | ||
| ONVC - MNLXF | 24% Poorly correlated | -30.23% | ||
| SDRMF - MNLXF | 17% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| TRNR - MNLXF | 4% Poorly correlated | -5.50% | ||
| ISPO - MNLXF | 3% Poorly correlated | -1.75% | ||
| IVP - MNLXF | -0% Poorly correlated | +0.27% |