IVPAF
Price
$9.06
Change
+$0.25 (+2.84%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
12.27B
72 days until earnings call
WLBMF
Price
$0.07
Change
+$0.01 (+16.67%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
71.76M
Interact to see
Advertisement

IVPAF vs WLBMF

Header iconIVPAF vs WLBMF Comparison
Open Charts IVPAF vs WLBMFBanner chart's image
Ivanhoe Mines
Price$9.06
Change+$0.25 (+2.84%)
Volume$95.73K
Capitalization12.27B
Wallbridge Mining
Price$0.07
Change+$0.01 (+16.67%)
Volume$67.76K
Capitalization71.76M
IVPAF vs WLBMF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
IVPAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WLBMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
IVPAF vs. WLBMF commentary
Sep 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IVPAF is a Buy and WLBMF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 06, 2025
Stock price -- (IVPAF: $9.06 vs. WLBMF: $0.07)
Brand notoriety: IVPAF and WLBMF are both not notable
IVPAF represents the Other Metals/Minerals, while WLBMF is part of the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: IVPAF: 33% vs. WLBMF: 29%
Market capitalization -- IVPAF: $12.27B vs. WLBMF: $71.76M
IVPAF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $12.27B. WLBMF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $71.76M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $94.52B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $2.28B. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $2.84B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

IVPAF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileWLBMF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • IVPAF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • WLBMF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, WLBMF is a better buy in the long-term than IVPAF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

IVPAF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WLBMF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • IVPAF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • WLBMF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, IVPAF is a better buy in the short-term than WLBMF.

Price Growth

IVPAF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а +2.50% price change this week, while WLBMF (@Precious Metals) price change was +12.78% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +4.20%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +9.26%, and the average quarterly price growth was +121.89%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +4.91%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +15.79%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4920.20%.

Reported Earning Dates

IVPAF is expected to report earnings on Nov 17, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+4.20% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

@Precious Metals (+4.91% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IVPAF($12.3B) has a higher market cap than WLBMF($71.8M). WLBMF YTD gains are higher at: 57.869 vs. IVPAF (-23.480). IVPAF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 355M vs. WLBMF (-7.13M). IVPAF has more cash in the bank: 655M vs. WLBMF (10.7M). WLBMF has less debt than IVPAF: WLBMF (5.04K) vs IVPAF (1.17B). IVPAF has higher revenues than WLBMF: IVPAF (215M) vs WLBMF (0).
IVPAFWLBMFIVPAF / WLBMF
Capitalization12.3B71.8M17,131%
EBITDA355M-7.13M-4,978%
Gain YTD-23.48057.869-41%
P/E Ratio31.24N/A-
Revenue215M0-
Total Cash655M10.7M6,121%
Total Debt1.17B5.04K23,174,603%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
IVPAF vs WLBMF: Fundamental Ratings
IVPAF
WLBMF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2325
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
91
Overvalued
76
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
60100
SMR RATING
1..100
7792
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5738
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
98100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

WLBMF's Valuation (76) in the null industry is in the same range as IVPAF (91). This means that WLBMF’s stock grew similarly to IVPAF’s over the last 12 months.

IVPAF's Profit vs Risk Rating (60) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for WLBMF (100). This means that IVPAF’s stock grew somewhat faster than WLBMF’s over the last 12 months.

IVPAF's SMR Rating (77) in the null industry is in the same range as WLBMF (92). This means that IVPAF’s stock grew similarly to WLBMF’s over the last 12 months.

WLBMF's Price Growth Rating (38) in the null industry is in the same range as IVPAF (57). This means that WLBMF’s stock grew similarly to IVPAF’s over the last 12 months.

IVPAF's P/E Growth Rating (98) in the null industry is in the same range as WLBMF (100). This means that IVPAF’s stock grew similarly to WLBMF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
IVPAFWLBMF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
86%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
82%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
81%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
83%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
79%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
80%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
78%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
80%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 17 days ago
75%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
77%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
IVPAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WLBMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BKUH0.02N/A
N/A
Bakhu Holdings, Corp.
RMSYF24.00N/A
N/A
Ramsay Health Care Ltd.
ELEZF28.35N/A
N/A
Endesa S.A.
BWERY20.00N/A
N/A
BW Energy Limited
DBOXF0.32N/A
-0.47%
D-Box Technologies, Inc.

IVPAF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IVPAF has been closely correlated with TECK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 70% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IVPAF jumps, then TECK could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To IVPAF
1D Price
Change %
IVPAF100%
+2.84%
TECK - IVPAF
70%
Closely correlated
+4.70%
GLNCY - IVPAF
62%
Loosely correlated
+0.65%
BHP - IVPAF
58%
Loosely correlated
+0.07%
GLCNF - IVPAF
57%
Loosely correlated
+0.79%
RIO - IVPAF
56%
Loosely correlated
+2.42%
More

WLBMF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that WLBMF and FGOVF have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that WLBMF and FGOVF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To WLBMF
1D Price
Change %
WLBMF100%
+2.52%
FGOVF - WLBMF
30%
Poorly correlated
+4.39%
USAS - WLBMF
30%
Poorly correlated
+2.61%
IVPAF - WLBMF
28%
Poorly correlated
+2.84%
RIO - WLBMF
26%
Poorly correlated
+2.42%
AZMCF - WLBMF
26%
Poorly correlated
-2.96%
More