Ad is loading...
IVRS vs XLK
IVRS vs XLK Comparison
Open Charts IVRS vs XLK
iShares Future Metaverse Tec And Com ETF
Price$31.41
Change+$0.67 (+2.18%)
Volume$423
Net Assets6.29M
The Technology Select Sector SPDR® ETF
Price$204.91
Change+$6.87 (+3.47%)
Volume$1.3K
Net Assets59.66B
IVRS vs XLK Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
IVRS vs. XLK commentary
Apr 24, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IVRS is a Buy and XLK is a StrongBuy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
XLK has more net assets: 59.7B vs. IVRS (6.29M). IVRS has a higher annual dividend yield than XLK: IVRS (-5.394) vs XLK (-14.679). IVRS was incepted earlier than XLK: IVRS (2 years) vs XLK (26 years). XLK (0.08) has a lower expense ratio than IVRS (0.47). IVRS has a higher turnover XLK (19.00) vs XLK (19.00).
| IVRS | XLK | IVRS / XLK | |
| Gain YTD | -5.394 | -14.679 | 37% |
| Net Assets | 6.29M | 59.7B | 0% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.47 | 0.08 | 587% |
| Turnover | 51.00 | 19.00 | 268% |
| Yield | 6.73 | 0.76 | 892% |
| Fund Existence | 2 years | 26 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| XLK | |
|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 83% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
IVRS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IVRS has been loosely correlated with ZM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 64% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if IVRS jumps, then ZM could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IVRS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IVRS | 100% | N/A | ||
| ZM - IVRS | 64% Loosely correlated | +1.53% | ||
| SNPS - IVRS | 63% Loosely correlated | +2.14% | ||
| SHOP - IVRS | 58% Loosely correlated | +6.13% | ||
| RBLX - IVRS | 57% Loosely correlated | +2.14% | ||
| AMD - IVRS | 57% Loosely correlated | +4.79% | ||
More | ||||
XLK and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, XLK has been closely correlated with LRCX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 82% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if XLK jumps, then LRCX could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To XLK | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| XLK | 100% | +2.90% | ||
| LRCX - XLK | 82% Closely correlated | +5.12% | ||
| KLAC - XLK | 82% Closely correlated | +3.26% | ||
| CDNS - XLK | 80% Closely correlated | +2.82% | ||
| AMAT - XLK | 80% Closely correlated | +3.82% | ||
| MPWR - XLK | 79% Closely correlated | +4.91% | ||
More | ||||