IVSBF
Price
$30.25
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Oct 2 closing price
IVSXF
Price
$27.65
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Sep 10 closing price
Ad is loading...

IVSBF vs IVSXF

Header iconIVSBF vs IVSXF Comparison
Open Charts IVSBF vs IVSXFBanner chart's image
Investors AB
Price$30.25
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$2.43K
CapitalizationN/A
Investors AB
Price$27.65
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$668
CapitalizationN/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
IVSBF vs IVSXF Comparison Chart
Loading...
VS
IVSBF vs. IVSXF commentary
Oct 18, 2024

To understand the difference between Investor AB - Ordinary Shares - Class B (IVSBF) vs. Investor AB - Ordinary Shares - Class A (IVSXF) it is enough to know the definitions of Ordinary Shares - Class B and Ordinary Shares - Class A

Ordinary Shares - Class B - Generally, Class B shares are issued by a company as a common stock with fewer voting rights and lower dividend priority than Class A shares. Class B may also have lower repayment priority in the event of a bankruptcy.

Ordinary Shares - Class A - Class A shares usually refer to common stocks with more voting rights than Class B shares. They often imply enhanced benefits such as dividend priority and liquidation preferences to the holder. Traditionally, this type of share helps a company's management to keep control over the company.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 18, 2024
Stock price -- (IVSBF: $29.29 vs. IVSXF: $28.27)
Brand notoriety: IVSBF and IVSXF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: IVSBF: 34% vs. IVSXF: 9%
Market capitalization -- IVSBF: $62.33B vs. IVSXF: $62.33B
IVSBF [@Investment Managers] is valued at $62.33B. IVSXF’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $62.33B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $124.17B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $5.9B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

IVSBF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileIVSXF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • IVSBF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • IVSXF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, IVSBF is a better buy in the long-term than IVSXF.

Price Growth

IVSBF (@Investment Managers) experienced а +0.14% price change this week, while IVSXF (@Investment Managers) price change was -4.86% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was -0.30%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.44%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.48%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (-0.30% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IVSBF($62.3B) and IVSXF($62.3B) have the same market capitalization . IVSBF (4.72) and IVSXF (4.66) have similar P/E ratio . IVSBF YTD gains are higher at: 27.403 vs. IVSXF (22.913). IVSBF (10.4B) and IVSXF (10.4B) have equal amount of cash in the bank . IVSBF (96.1B) and IVSXF (96.1B) have identical debt. IVSBF (189B) and IVSXF (189B) have equivalent revenues.
IVSBFIVSXFIVSBF / IVSXF
Capitalization62.3B62.3B100%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD27.40322.913120%
P/E Ratio4.724.66101%
Revenue189B189B100%
Total Cash10.4B10.4B100%
Total Debt96.1B96.1B100%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
IVSBF vs IVSXF: Fundamental Ratings
IVSBF
IVSXF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6939
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
25
Undervalued
25
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
2474
SMR RATING
1..100
9696
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4642
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
8386
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
9585

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

IVSBF's Valuation (25) in the null industry is in the same range as IVSXF (25). This means that IVSBF’s stock grew similarly to IVSXF’s over the last 12 months.

IVSBF's Profit vs Risk Rating (24) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for IVSXF (74). This means that IVSBF’s stock grew somewhat faster than IVSXF’s over the last 12 months.

IVSBF's SMR Rating (96) in the null industry is in the same range as IVSXF (96). This means that IVSBF’s stock grew similarly to IVSXF’s over the last 12 months.

IVSXF's Price Growth Rating (42) in the null industry is in the same range as IVSBF (46). This means that IVSXF’s stock grew similarly to IVSBF’s over the last 12 months.

IVSBF's P/E Growth Rating (83) in the null industry is in the same range as IVSXF (86). This means that IVSBF’s stock grew similarly to IVSXF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AAPL232.150.37
+0.16%
Apple
SPY582.350.05
+0.01%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
TSLA220.89-0.44
-0.20%
Tesla
BTC.X67399.836000-212.882810
-0.31%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
GME21.41-0.25
-1.15%
GameStop Corp

IVSBF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that IVSBF and VRTS have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that IVSBF and VRTS's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To IVSBF
1D Price
Change %
IVSBF100%
N/A
VRTS - IVSBF
28%
Poorly correlated
+0.33%
FNNCF - IVSBF
27%
Poorly correlated
+3.25%
TGOPY - IVSBF
26%
Poorly correlated
+2.51%
LGGNY - IVSBF
24%
Poorly correlated
+0.94%
HALFF - IVSBF
24%
Poorly correlated
-0.20%
More

IVSXF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IVSXF has been loosely correlated with DVDDF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 47% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if IVSXF jumps, then DVDDF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To IVSXF
1D Price
Change %
IVSXF100%
-4.86%
DVDDF - IVSXF
47%
Loosely correlated
N/A
ICGUF - IVSXF
14%
Poorly correlated
N/A
IVSBF - IVSXF
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
JBARF - IVSXF
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
IPZYF - IVSXF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More