Ad is loading...
IVSBF
Price
$26.25
Change
-$0.80 (-2.96%)
Updated
Nov 15 closing price
LGGNY
Price
$13.92
Change
+$0.12 (+0.87%)
Updated
Nov 15 closing price
Earnings call today
Ad is loading...

IVSBF vs LGGNY

Header iconIVSBF vs LGGNY Comparison
Open Charts IVSBF vs LGGNYBanner chart's image
Investors AB
Price$26.25
Change-$0.80 (-2.96%)
Volume$442
CapitalizationN/A
Legal & General Group
Price$13.92
Change+$0.12 (+0.87%)
Volume$136.74K
CapitalizationN/A
IVSBF vs LGGNY Comparison Chart
Loading...
LGGNY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
IVSBF vs. LGGNY commentary
Nov 18, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IVSBF is a Hold and LGGNY is a StrongSell.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 18, 2024
Stock price -- (IVSBF: $26.25 vs. LGGNY: $13.92)
Brand notoriety: IVSBF and LGGNY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: IVSBF: 23% vs. LGGNY: 247%
Market capitalization -- IVSBF: $62.33B vs. LGGNY: $17.93B
IVSBF [@Investment Managers] is valued at $62.33B. LGGNY’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $17.93B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $124.17B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $5.91B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

IVSBF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileLGGNY’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • IVSBF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • LGGNY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both IVSBF and LGGNY are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

LGGNY’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • LGGNY’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 7 bearish.

Price Growth

IVSBF (@Investment Managers) experienced а -3.76% price change this week, while LGGNY (@Investment Managers) price change was -1.42% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was +2.13%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.37%, and the average quarterly price growth was +5.40%.

Reported Earning Dates

LGGNY is expected to report earnings on Nov 18, 2024.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (+2.13% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IVSBF($62.3B) has a higher market cap than LGGNY($17.9B). LGGNY has higher P/E ratio than IVSBF: LGGNY (6.41) vs IVSBF (4.72). IVSBF YTD gains are higher at: 14.180 vs. LGGNY (-7.255). IVSBF has higher revenues than LGGNY: IVSBF (189B) vs LGGNY (-89.29B).
IVSBFLGGNYIVSBF / LGGNY
Capitalization62.3B17.9B348%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD14.180-7.255-195%
P/E Ratio4.726.4174%
Revenue189B-89.29B-212%
Total Cash10.4BN/A-
Total Debt96.1BN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
IVSBF vs LGGNY: Fundamental Ratings
IVSBF
LGGNY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
24
Undervalued
6
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
3075
SMR RATING
1..100
9796
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5760
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
8935
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
7575

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

LGGNY's Valuation (6) in the null industry is in the same range as IVSBF (24). This means that LGGNY’s stock grew similarly to IVSBF’s over the last 12 months.

IVSBF's Profit vs Risk Rating (30) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LGGNY (75). This means that IVSBF’s stock grew somewhat faster than LGGNY’s over the last 12 months.

LGGNY's SMR Rating (96) in the null industry is in the same range as IVSBF (97). This means that LGGNY’s stock grew similarly to IVSBF’s over the last 12 months.

IVSBF's Price Growth Rating (57) in the null industry is in the same range as LGGNY (60). This means that IVSBF’s stock grew similarly to LGGNY’s over the last 12 months.

LGGNY's P/E Growth Rating (35) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for IVSBF (89). This means that LGGNY’s stock grew somewhat faster than IVSBF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LGGNY
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
69%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
57%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
62%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
59%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
56%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 14 days ago
56%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
62%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
76%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
60%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
LGGNY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BINC52.560.03
+0.06%
iShares Flexible Income Active ETF
XTJL33.41-0.25
-0.74%
Innovator US Equity Acclrtd Pls ETF Jul
NVBW30.77-0.23
-0.74%
AllianzIM U.S. Large Cp Buffer20 Nov ETF
WTAI20.86-0.36
-1.69%
WisdomTree Artfcl Intllgnc & Innvtn ETF
PSC53.21-0.95
-1.75%
Principal US Small Cap ETF

IVSBF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that IVSBF and FNNCF have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that IVSBF and FNNCF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To IVSBF
1D Price
Change %
IVSBF100%
-2.96%
FNNCF - IVSBF
27%
Poorly correlated
+2.40%
VRTS - IVSBF
26%
Poorly correlated
-1.46%
HALFF - IVSBF
25%
Poorly correlated
-1.83%
TGOPY - IVSBF
24%
Poorly correlated
-0.37%
LGGNY - IVSBF
22%
Poorly correlated
+0.87%
More

LGGNY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LGGNY has been loosely correlated with APAM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 52% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LGGNY jumps, then APAM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LGGNY
1D Price
Change %
LGGNY100%
+0.87%
APAM - LGGNY
52%
Loosely correlated
-0.66%
BN - LGGNY
51%
Loosely correlated
-1.75%
JHG - LGGNY
49%
Loosely correlated
-2.54%
BAM - LGGNY
48%
Loosely correlated
-0.54%
PAX - LGGNY
47%
Loosely correlated
-2.38%
More