IVSBF
Price
$29.82
Change
+$0.78 (+2.69%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
62.33B
TGOPY
Price
$28.22
Change
+$0.18 (+0.64%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
24.73B
11 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

IVSBF vs TGOPY

Header iconIVSBF vs TGOPY Comparison
Open Charts IVSBF vs TGOPYBanner chart's image
Investors AB
Price$29.82
Change+$0.78 (+2.69%)
Volume$390
Capitalization62.33B
3i Group
Price$28.22
Change+$0.18 (+0.64%)
Volume$74.26K
Capitalization24.73B
IVSBF vs TGOPY Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
IVSBF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TGOPY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
IVSBF vs. TGOPY commentary
Jul 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IVSBF is a Hold and TGOPY is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 06, 2025
Stock price -- (IVSBF: $29.82 vs. TGOPY: $28.22)
Brand notoriety: IVSBF and TGOPY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: IVSBF: 8% vs. TGOPY: 63%
Market capitalization -- IVSBF: $62.33B vs. TGOPY: $24.73B
IVSBF [@Investment Managers] is valued at $62.33B. TGOPY’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $24.73B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $124.17B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $6.16B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

IVSBF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileTGOPY’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • IVSBF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • TGOPY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, TGOPY is a better buy in the long-term than IVSBF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

IVSBF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TGOPY’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • IVSBF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • TGOPY’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, IVSBF is a better buy in the short-term than TGOPY.

Price Growth

IVSBF (@Investment Managers) experienced а +5.45% price change this week, while TGOPY (@Investment Managers) price change was -2.25% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was +2.17%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.54%, and the average quarterly price growth was +10.33%.

Reported Earning Dates

IVSBF is expected to report earnings on Apr 04, 2025.

TGOPY is expected to report earnings on Jul 17, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (+2.17% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IVSBF($62.3B) has a higher market cap than TGOPY($24.7B). IVSBF has higher P/E ratio than TGOPY: IVSBF (4.72) vs TGOPY (4.16). TGOPY YTD gains are higher at: 26.150 vs. IVSBF (13.276). TGOPY has less debt than IVSBF: TGOPY (785M) vs IVSBF (96.1B). IVSBF has higher revenues than TGOPY: IVSBF (189B) vs TGOPY (4.71B).
IVSBFTGOPYIVSBF / TGOPY
Capitalization62.3B24.7B252%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD13.27626.15051%
P/E Ratio4.724.16113%
Revenue189B4.71B4,011%
Total Cash10.4BN/A-
Total Debt96.1B785M12,242%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
IVSBF vs TGOPY: Fundamental Ratings
IVSBF
TGOPY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5069
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
39
Fair valued
39
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
342
SMR RATING
1..100
10043
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5244
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
357
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

IVSBF's Valuation (39) in the null industry is in the same range as TGOPY (39). This means that IVSBF’s stock grew similarly to TGOPY’s over the last 12 months.

TGOPY's Profit vs Risk Rating (2) in the null industry is in the same range as IVSBF (34). This means that TGOPY’s stock grew similarly to IVSBF’s over the last 12 months.

TGOPY's SMR Rating (43) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for IVSBF (100). This means that TGOPY’s stock grew somewhat faster than IVSBF’s over the last 12 months.

TGOPY's Price Growth Rating (44) in the null industry is in the same range as IVSBF (52). This means that TGOPY’s stock grew similarly to IVSBF’s over the last 12 months.

IVSBF's P/E Growth Rating (3) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for TGOPY (57). This means that IVSBF’s stock grew somewhat faster than TGOPY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
IVSBFTGOPY
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
51%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
45%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
55%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
55%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
56%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
66%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
57%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
55%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
56%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
74%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
74%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
48%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
57%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
48%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
77%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
IVSBF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TGOPY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
DBX28.000.45
+1.63%
Dropbox
VEON43.36-0.14
-0.32%
VEON Ltd
CCEL5.05-0.05
-0.96%
Cryo-Cell International
JACK20.37-0.22
-1.07%
Jack In The Box
NHPBP14.62-0.48
-3.18%
National Healthcare Properties Inc

IVSBF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that IVSBF and FNNCF have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that IVSBF and FNNCF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To IVSBF
1D Price
Change %
IVSBF100%
+2.69%
FNNCF - IVSBF
27%
Poorly correlated
+1.75%
VRTS - IVSBF
26%
Poorly correlated
-0.80%
HALFF - IVSBF
25%
Poorly correlated
-0.34%
TGOPY - IVSBF
24%
Poorly correlated
+0.64%
LGGNY - IVSBF
22%
Poorly correlated
+1.05%
More

TGOPY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TGOPY has been loosely correlated with BN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 50% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if TGOPY jumps, then BN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TGOPY
1D Price
Change %
TGOPY100%
+0.64%
BN - TGOPY
50%
Loosely correlated
+2.67%
BAM - TGOPY
45%
Loosely correlated
+2.29%
TPG - TGOPY
43%
Loosely correlated
+0.75%
HLNE - TGOPY
42%
Loosely correlated
+1.29%
AAMI - TGOPY
40%
Loosely correlated
+2.26%
More