IVZ
Price
$22.79
Change
-$0.01 (-0.04%)
Updated
Oct 17 closing price
Capitalization
10.16B
8 days until earnings call
Intraday Buy/Sell Signals
OWL
Price
$16.18
Change
+$0.29 (+1.83%)
Updated
Oct 17 closing price
Capitalization
10.53B
10 days until earnings call
Intraday Buy/Sell Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

IVZ vs OWL

Header iconIVZ vs OWL Comparison
Open Charts IVZ vs OWLBanner chart's image
Inves
Price$22.79
Change-$0.01 (-0.04%)
Volume$3.8M
Capitalization10.16B
Blue Owl Capital
Price$16.18
Change+$0.29 (+1.83%)
Volume$14.67M
Capitalization10.53B
IVZ vs OWL Comparison Chart in %
IVZ
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
OWL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
IVZ vs. OWL commentary
Oct 20, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IVZ is a Hold and OWL is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 20, 2025
Stock price -- (IVZ: $22.79 vs. OWL: $16.18)
Brand notoriety: IVZ and OWL are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: IVZ: 93% vs. OWL: 149%
Market capitalization -- IVZ: $10.16B vs. OWL: $10.53B
IVZ [@Investment Managers] is valued at $10.16B. OWL’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $10.53B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $180.1B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $7.21B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

IVZ’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileOWL’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • IVZ’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • OWL’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, IVZ is a better buy in the long-term than OWL.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

IVZ’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while OWL’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • IVZ’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • OWL’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, OWL is a better buy in the short-term than IVZ.

Price Growth

IVZ (@Investment Managers) experienced а +1.42% price change this week, while OWL (@Investment Managers) price change was +4.79% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was +0.22%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.04%, and the average quarterly price growth was +18.78%.

Reported Earning Dates

IVZ is expected to report earnings on Oct 28, 2025.

OWL is expected to report earnings on Oct 30, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (+0.22% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
OWL($10.5B) and IVZ($10.2B) have the same market capitalization . OWL has higher P/E ratio than IVZ: OWL (147.09) vs IVZ (24.51). IVZ YTD gains are higher at: 34.955 vs. OWL (-28.312). IVZ has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.31B vs. OWL (804M). IVZ has more cash in the bank: 1.49B vs. OWL (118M). IVZ has less debt than OWL: IVZ (1.88B) vs OWL (3.65B). IVZ has higher revenues than OWL: IVZ (6.15B) vs OWL (2.62B).
IVZOWLIVZ / OWL
Capitalization10.2B10.5B97%
EBITDA1.31B804M163%
Gain YTD34.955-28.312-123%
P/E Ratio24.51147.0917%
Revenue6.15B2.62B235%
Total Cash1.49B118M1,264%
Total Debt1.88B3.65B52%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
IVZ: Fundamental Ratings
IVZ
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
75
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
19
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
41
SMR RATING
1..100
87
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
11
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
14
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
IVZOWL
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
72%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
69%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
67%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
73%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
76%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
67%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
70%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
IVZ
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
OWL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FJUN55.830.23
+0.42%
FT Vest US Equity Buffer ETF Jun
LAYS58.150.11
+0.20%
STKd 100% NVDA & 100% AMD ETF
XRLX46.430.07
+0.15%
FundX Conservative ETF
PABD63.95-0.28
-0.43%
iSharesParis-AlgndClmOptdMSCIWldexUSAETF
APPX98.37-2.04
-2.03%
Tradr 2X Long APP Daily ETF

IVZ and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IVZ has been closely correlated with ARES. These tickers have moved in lockstep 71% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IVZ jumps, then ARES could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To IVZ
1D Price
Change %
IVZ100%
-0.04%
ARES - IVZ
71%
Closely correlated
+0.45%
STEP - IVZ
68%
Closely correlated
-0.36%
APO - IVZ
67%
Closely correlated
+0.45%
CRBG - IVZ
66%
Closely correlated
+1.18%
OWL - IVZ
65%
Loosely correlated
+1.83%
More

OWL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, OWL has been closely correlated with ARES. These tickers have moved in lockstep 88% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if OWL jumps, then ARES could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To OWL
1D Price
Change %
OWL100%
+1.83%
ARES - OWL
88%
Closely correlated
+0.45%
KKR - OWL
87%
Closely correlated
+0.07%
APO - OWL
86%
Closely correlated
+0.45%
CG - OWL
84%
Closely correlated
+0.26%
TPG - OWL
84%
Closely correlated
+0.05%
More