IWD | ULVM | IWD / ULVM | |
Gain YTD | 8.042 | 9.163 | 88% |
Net Assets | 62.6B | 169M | 37,041% |
Total Expense Ratio | 0.19 | 0.20 | 95% |
Turnover | 14.00 | 118.00 | 12% |
Yield | 1.86 | 1.81 | 103% |
Fund Existence | 25 years | 8 years | - |
IWD | ULVM | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago74% | 1 day ago71% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago69% | 1 day ago70% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago81% | 1 day ago84% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago83% | 1 day ago81% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago83% | 1 day ago82% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago81% | 1 day ago80% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago83% | 4 days ago83% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 1 day ago78% | N/A |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago89% | 1 day ago67% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago81% | 1 day ago78% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IWD has been closely correlated with BAC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 77% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IWD jumps, then BAC could also see price increases.
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ULVM has been closely correlated with TFC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 75% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ULVM jumps, then TFC could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ULVM | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
ULVM | 100% | N/A | ||
TFC - ULVM | 75% Closely correlated | -1.18% | ||
FITB - ULVM | 75% Closely correlated | -1.62% | ||
PNC - ULVM | 75% Closely correlated | -1.70% | ||
CE - ULVM | 73% Closely correlated | -0.33% | ||
JEF - ULVM | 73% Closely correlated | -2.37% | ||
More |