IWD | ULVM | IWD / ULVM | |
Gain YTD | 20.319 | 27.514 | 74% |
Net Assets | 61.8B | 162M | 38,148% |
Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
Turnover | 15.00 | 101.00 | 15% |
Yield | 1.87 | 1.70 | 110% |
Fund Existence | 25 years | 7 years | - |
IWD | ULVM | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago74% | 15 days ago71% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago79% | 15 days ago70% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago90% | 15 days ago85% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago84% | 15 days ago84% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago83% | 15 days ago84% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago82% | 15 days ago82% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago82% | 15 days ago86% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 8 days ago77% | 19 days ago72% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago90% | 15 days ago64% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago82% | 15 days ago82% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IWD has been closely correlated with BAC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 77% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IWD jumps, then BAC could also see price increases.
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ULVM has been closely correlated with CE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 73% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ULVM jumps, then CE could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ULVM | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
ULVM | 100% | +2.15% | ||
CE - ULVM | 73% Closely correlated | +2.88% | ||
URI - ULVM | 71% Closely correlated | +2.46% | ||
PHM - ULVM | 71% Closely correlated | +0.05% | ||
GS - ULVM | 70% Closely correlated | +2.44% | ||
BEN - ULVM | 70% Closely correlated | +0.37% | ||
More |