Ad is loading...
IWF vs IWLG
IWF vs IWLG Comparison
Open Charts IWF vs IWLG
iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF
Price$343.88
Change-$13.78 (-3.85%)
Volume$16.38K
Net Assets85.2B
NYLI Winslow Large Cap Growth ETF
Price$40.60
Change-$2.07 (-4.85%)
Volume$100
Net Assets94.66M
IWF vs IWLG Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
IWF vs. IWLG commentary
Apr 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IWF is a Buy and IWLG is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IWF has more net assets: 85.2B vs. IWLG (94.7M). IWLG has a higher annual dividend yield than IWF: IWLG (-9.687) vs IWF (-10.841). IWF was incepted earlier than IWLG: IWF (25 years) vs IWLG (3 years). IWF (0.19) has a lower expense ratio than IWLG (0.60). IWLG has a higher turnover IWF (12.00) vs IWF (12.00).
| IWF | IWLG | IWF / IWLG | |
| Gain YTD | -10.841 | -9.687 | 112% |
| Net Assets | 85.2B | 94.7M | 89,968% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.19 | 0.60 | 32% |
| Turnover | 12.00 | 70.00 | 17% |
| Yield | 0.50 | 1.47 | 34% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 3 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| IWF | |
|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 88% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 79% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
IWF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IWF has been closely correlated with CDNS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IWF jumps, then CDNS could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IWF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IWF | 100% | +11.62% | ||
| CDNS - IWF | 79% Closely correlated | +14.25% | ||
| SNPS - IWF | 78% Closely correlated | +12.35% | ||
| MSFT - IWF | 77% Closely correlated | +10.13% | ||
| AMZN - IWF | 74% Closely correlated | +11.98% | ||
| KLAC - IWF | 73% Closely correlated | +17.31% | ||
More | ||||
IWLG and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IWLG has been closely correlated with MSFT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IWLG jumps, then MSFT could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IWLG | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IWLG | 100% | +11.58% | ||
| MSFT - IWLG | 78% Closely correlated | +10.13% | ||
| NOW - IWLG | 77% Closely correlated | +13.52% | ||
| AMZN - IWLG | 74% Closely correlated | +11.98% | ||
| ASML - IWLG | 73% Closely correlated | +15.43% | ||
| NVDA - IWLG | 73% Closely correlated | +18.72% | ||
More | ||||