Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
IWF vs LCLG
IWF vs LCLG Comparison
Open Charts IWF vs LCLG
iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF
Price$407.62
Change+$4.06 (+1.01%)
Volume$1.13K
Net Assets106.8B
Logan Capital Broad Innovative Gr ETF
Price$54.27
Change+$0.84 (+1.57%)
Volume$704
Net Assets77.67M
IWF vs LCLG Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
IWF vs. LCLG commentary
Jun 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IWF is a Buy and LCLG is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IWF has more net assets: 107B vs. LCLG (77.7M). LCLG has a higher annual dividend yield than IWF: LCLG (2.024) vs IWF (0.601). IWF was incepted earlier than LCLG: IWF (25 years) vs LCLG (13 years). IWF (0.19) has a lower expense ratio than LCLG (0.96). IWF has a higher turnover LCLG (8.00) vs LCLG (8.00).
| IWF | LCLG | IWF / LCLG | |
| Gain YTD | 0.601 | 2.024 | 30% |
| Net Assets | 107B | 77.7M | 137,709% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.19 | 0.96 | 20% |
| Turnover | 12.00 | 8.00 | 150% |
| Yield | 0.45 | 0.06 | 790% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 13 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| IWF | |
|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 87% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 17 days ago 80% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
LCLG and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LCLG has been closely correlated with APH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 74% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if LCLG jumps, then APH could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LCLG | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LCLG | 100% | +1.58% | ||
| APH - LCLG | 74% Closely correlated | +0.66% | ||
| KLAC - LCLG | 72% Closely correlated | +1.25% | ||
| AVGO - LCLG | 70% Closely correlated | -0.44% | ||
| NDSN - LCLG | 67% Closely correlated | +0.16% | ||
| URI - LCLG | 65% Loosely correlated | -0.53% | ||
More | ||||