Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
IWF vs LCLG
IWF vs LCLG Comparison
Open Charts IWF vs LCLG
iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF
Price$428.08
Change+$4.56 (+1.08%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets110.55B
Logan Capital Broad Innovative Gr ETF
Price$56.25
Change+$0.72 (+1.30%)
Volume$797
Net Assets80.67M
IWF vs LCLG Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
IWF vs. LCLG commentary
Jul 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IWF is a Buy and LCLG is a StrongBuy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IWF has more net assets: 111B vs. LCLG (80.7M). LCLG (5.747) and IWF (5.679) have matching annual dividend yield . IWF was incepted earlier than LCLG: IWF (25 years) vs LCLG (13 years). IWF (0.19) has a lower expense ratio than LCLG (0.96). IWF has a higher turnover LCLG (8.00) vs LCLG (8.00).
| IWF | LCLG | IWF / LCLG | |
| Gain YTD | 5.679 | 5.747 | 99% |
| Net Assets | 111B | 80.7M | 137,546% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.19 | 0.96 | 20% |
| Turnover | 12.00 | 8.00 | 150% |
| Yield | 0.42 | 0.05 | 772% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 13 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| IWF | LCLG | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 79% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 68% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 89% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 89% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 87% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 88% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 87% | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 14 days ago 79% | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 65% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 86% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
IWF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IWF has been closely correlated with CDNS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IWF jumps, then CDNS could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IWF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IWF | 100% | +0.81% | ||
| CDNS - IWF | 79% Closely correlated | +0.48% | ||
| SNPS - IWF | 78% Closely correlated | +0.25% | ||
| MSFT - IWF | 77% Closely correlated | -0.20% | ||
| AMZN - IWF | 74% Closely correlated | -0.24% | ||
| KLAC - IWF | 73% Closely correlated | +2.48% | ||
More | ||||
LCLG and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LCLG has been closely correlated with APH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 74% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if LCLG jumps, then APH could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LCLG | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LCLG | 100% | +1.30% | ||
| APH - LCLG | 74% Closely correlated | +1.16% | ||
| KLAC - LCLG | 72% Closely correlated | +2.48% | ||
| AVGO - LCLG | 70% Closely correlated | +1.95% | ||
| NDSN - LCLG | 67% Closely correlated | +1.03% | ||
| URI - LCLG | 65% Loosely correlated | +1.76% | ||
More | ||||