Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
IWF vs MILN
IWF vs MILN Comparison
Open Charts IWF vs MILN
iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF
Price$407.57
Change+$4.01 (+0.99%)
Volume$991.19K
Net Assets106B
Global X Millennials Consumer ETF
Price$47.75
Change+$0.17 (+0.36%)
Volume$3.36K
Net Assets123.11M
IWF vs MILN Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
IWF vs. MILN commentary
Jun 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IWF is a Buy and MILN is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IWF has more net assets: 106B vs. MILN (123M). MILN has a higher annual dividend yield than IWF: MILN (6.206) vs IWF (1.600). IWF was incepted earlier than MILN: IWF (25 years) vs MILN (9 years). IWF (0.19) has a lower expense ratio than MILN (0.50). IWF has a higher turnover MILN (10.95) vs MILN (10.95).
| IWF | MILN | IWF / MILN | |
| Gain YTD | 1.600 | 6.206 | 26% |
| Net Assets | 106B | 123M | 86,179% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.19 | 0.50 | 38% |
| Turnover | 12.00 | 10.95 | 110% |
| Yield | 0.45 | 0.22 | 207% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 9 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| IWF | MILN | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 78% | 1 day ago 81% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 80% | 1 day ago 82% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago 83% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 83% | 1 day ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 88% | 1 day ago 86% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 87% | 1 day ago 86% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 87% | 3 days ago 86% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 17 days ago 80% | 9 days ago 82% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 80% | 1 day ago 74% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 88% | 1 day ago 87% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
IWF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IWF has been closely correlated with CDNS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IWF jumps, then CDNS could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IWF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IWF | 100% | +0.99% | ||
| CDNS - IWF | 79% Closely correlated | +0.22% | ||
| SNPS - IWF | 78% Closely correlated | +0.79% | ||
| MSFT - IWF | 77% Closely correlated | +0.58% | ||
| AMZN - IWF | 74% Closely correlated | +2.72% | ||
| KLAC - IWF | 73% Closely correlated | +2.03% | ||
More | ||||
MILN and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MILN has been closely correlated with BKNG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 71% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MILN jumps, then BKNG could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MILN | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MILN | 100% | +0.36% | ||
| BKNG - MILN | 71% Closely correlated | +0.97% | ||
| XYZ - MILN | 70% Closely correlated | +2.19% | ||
| SOFI - MILN | 70% Closely correlated | +4.17% | ||
| CVNA - MILN | 70% Closely correlated | -0.54% | ||
| DASH - MILN | 69% Closely correlated | +1.21% | ||
More | ||||