Ad is loading...
IWF vs MILN
IWF vs MILN Comparison
Open Charts IWF vs MILN
iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF
Price$407.61
Change+$4.63 (+1.15%)
Volume$6.56K
CapitalizationN/A
Global X Millennials Consumer ETF
Price$45.90
Change+$0.45 (+0.99%)
Volume$100
CapitalizationN/A
IWF vs MILN Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
IWF vs. MILN commentary
Dec 23, 2024
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IWF is a StrongBuy and MILN is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IWF has more net assets: 107B vs. MILN (125M). IWF has a higher annual dividend yield than MILN: IWF (35.028) vs MILN (29.192). IWF was incepted earlier than MILN: IWF (25 years) vs MILN (9 years). MILN has a higher turnover IWF (14.00) vs IWF (14.00).
| IWF | MILN | IWF / MILN | |
| Gain YTD | 35.028 | 29.192 | 120% |
| Net Assets | 107B | 125M | 85,600% |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Turnover | 14.00 | 16.60 | 84% |
| Yield | 0.58 | 0.30 | 192% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 9 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| IWF | MILN | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 71% | 4 days ago 84% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 87% | 4 days ago 82% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 73% | 4 days ago 81% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 77% | 4 days ago 83% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 77% | 4 days ago 81% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 88% | 4 days ago 88% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 89% | 20 days ago 87% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 78% | 5 days ago 81% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 87% | 4 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% | 4 days ago 89% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
IWF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IWF has been closely correlated with CDNS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IWF jumps, then CDNS could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IWF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IWF | 100% | +1.08% | ||
| CDNS - IWF | 79% Closely correlated | +0.53% | ||
| SNPS - IWF | 78% Closely correlated | -0.24% | ||
| MSFT - IWF | 77% Closely correlated | -0.10% | ||
| AMZN - IWF | 74% Closely correlated | +0.73% | ||
| KLAC - IWF | 73% Closely correlated | +1.16% | ||
More | ||||
MILN and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MILN has been closely correlated with SQ. These tickers have moved in lockstep 70% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MILN jumps, then SQ could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MILN | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MILN | 100% | +0.73% | ||
| SQ - MILN | 70% Closely correlated | +2.29% | ||
| W - MILN | 68% Closely correlated | +4.50% | ||
| AMZN - MILN | 64% Loosely correlated | +0.73% | ||
| HD - MILN | 63% Loosely correlated | +1.97% | ||
| LOW - MILN | 62% Loosely correlated | +1.31% | ||
More | ||||