Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
IWF vs MILN
IWF vs MILN Comparison
Open Charts IWF vs MILN
iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF
Price$445.59
Change+$3.30 (+0.75%)
Volume$1.12K
Net Assets115.79B
Global X Millennials Consumer ETF
Price$48.30
Change-$0.11 (-0.23%)
Volume$130
Net Assets124.83M
IWF vs MILN Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
IWF vs. MILN commentary
Aug 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IWF is a Buy and MILN is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IWF has more net assets: 116B vs. MILN (125M). IWF has a higher annual dividend yield than MILN: IWF (10.363) vs MILN (7.704). IWF was incepted earlier than MILN: IWF (25 years) vs MILN (9 years). IWF (0.19) has a lower expense ratio than MILN (0.50). IWF has a higher turnover MILN (10.95) vs MILN (10.95).
| IWF | MILN | IWF / MILN | |
| Gain YTD | 10.363 | 7.704 | 135% |
| Net Assets | 116B | 125M | 92,800% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.19 | 0.50 | 38% |
| Turnover | 12.00 | 10.95 | 110% |
| Yield | 0.40 | 0.21 | 189% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 9 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| IWF | MILN | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 74% | 2 days ago 84% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 74% | 2 days ago 82% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 83% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 77% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 86% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 82% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 86% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 29 days ago 80% | 8 days ago 81% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 82% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
IWF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IWF has been closely correlated with CDNS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IWF jumps, then CDNS could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IWF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IWF | 100% | -0.15% | ||
| CDNS - IWF | 79% Closely correlated | -1.62% | ||
| SNPS - IWF | 78% Closely correlated | -0.89% | ||
| MSFT - IWF | 77% Closely correlated | -0.78% | ||
| AMZN - IWF | 74% Closely correlated | +0.37% | ||
| KLAC - IWF | 73% Closely correlated | +2.68% | ||
More | ||||
MILN and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MILN has been closely correlated with AMZN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 74% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MILN jumps, then AMZN could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MILN | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MILN | 100% | +0.06% | ||
| AMZN - MILN | 74% Closely correlated | +0.37% | ||
| BKNG - MILN | 73% Closely correlated | -1.88% | ||
| SOFI - MILN | 71% Closely correlated | +2.89% | ||
| AAPL - MILN | 70% Closely correlated | +3.18% | ||
| DIS - MILN | 70% Closely correlated | -1.99% | ||
More | ||||