Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
IWF vs MTUM
IWF vs MTUM Comparison
Open Charts IWF vs MTUM
iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF
Price$445.59
Change-$5.35 (-1.19%)
Volume$599.54K
Net Assets115.94B
iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF
Price$243.73
Change-$2.59 (-1.05%)
Volume$568.36K
Net Assets18.06B
IWF vs MTUM Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
IWF vs. MTUM commentary
Aug 31, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IWF is a Hold and MTUM is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IWF has more net assets: 116B vs. MTUM (18.1B). MTUM has a higher annual dividend yield than IWF: MTUM (18.336) vs IWF (11.186). IWF was incepted earlier than MTUM: IWF (25 years) vs MTUM (12 years). MTUM (0.15) has a lower expense ratio than IWF (0.18). MTUM has a higher turnover IWF (13.00) vs IWF (13.00).
| IWF | MTUM | IWF / MTUM | |
| Gain YTD | 11.186 | 18.336 | 61% |
| Net Assets | 116B | 18.1B | 641% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.18 | 0.15 | 120% |
| Turnover | 13.00 | 95.00 | 14% |
| Yield | 0.40 | 0.90 | 44% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 12 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| IWF | MTUM | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 73% | 3 days ago 77% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 78% | 3 days ago 75% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 81% | 3 days ago 84% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 82% | 3 days ago 84% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 88% | 3 days ago 84% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 87% | 3 days ago 84% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 87% | 20 days ago 84% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 79% | 14 days ago 80% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 82% | 3 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 81% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
IWF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IWF has been closely correlated with CDNS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IWF jumps, then CDNS could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IWF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IWF | 100% | -1.19% | ||
| CDNS - IWF | 79% Closely correlated | -1.09% | ||
| SNPS - IWF | 78% Closely correlated | -1.41% | ||
| MSFT - IWF | 77% Closely correlated | -0.58% | ||
| AMZN - IWF | 74% Closely correlated | -1.12% | ||
| KLAC - IWF | 73% Closely correlated | -2.46% | ||
More | ||||
MTUM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MTUM has been closely correlated with ARES. These tickers have moved in lockstep 82% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MTUM jumps, then ARES could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MTUM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MTUM | 100% | -1.05% | ||
| ARES - MTUM | 82% Closely correlated | -0.59% | ||
| KKR - MTUM | 81% Closely correlated | -0.43% | ||
| GS - MTUM | 81% Closely correlated | -0.26% | ||
| PH - MTUM | 80% Closely correlated | -0.98% | ||
| MS - MTUM | 80% Closely correlated | +0.20% | ||
More | ||||