Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
IWF vs PWB
IWF vs PWB Comparison
Open Charts IWF vs PWB
iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF
Price$415.44
Change+$1.44 (+0.35%)
Volume$598.37K
Net Assets108.91B
Invesco Large Cap Growth ETF
Price$114.07
Change-$0.63 (-0.55%)
Volume$26.34K
Net Assets1.18B
IWF vs PWB Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
IWF vs. PWB commentary
Jun 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IWF is a Hold and PWB is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IWF has more net assets: 109B vs. PWB (1.19B). PWB has a higher annual dividend yield than IWF: PWB (12.121) vs IWF (3.663). IWF was incepted earlier than PWB: IWF (25 years) vs PWB (20 years). IWF (0.19) has a lower expense ratio than PWB (0.56). PWB has a higher turnover IWF (12.00) vs IWF (12.00).
| IWF | PWB | IWF / PWB | |
| Gain YTD | 3.663 | 12.121 | 30% |
| Net Assets | 109B | 1.19B | 9,198% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.19 | 0.56 | 34% |
| Turnover | 12.00 | 101.00 | 12% |
| Yield | 0.45 | 0.07 | 676% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 20 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| IWF | PWB | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 88% | 1 day ago 76% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 75% | 1 day ago 67% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago 90% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 77% | 1 day ago 70% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 88% | 1 day ago 87% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 87% | 1 day ago 84% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 87% | 3 days ago 89% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 79% | 7 days ago 76% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 80% | 1 day ago 88% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 88% | 1 day ago 84% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
IWF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IWF has been closely correlated with CDNS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IWF jumps, then CDNS could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IWF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IWF | 100% | +0.35% | ||
| CDNS - IWF | 79% Closely correlated | +0.25% | ||
| SNPS - IWF | 78% Closely correlated | +1.73% | ||
| MSFT - IWF | 77% Closely correlated | +0.44% | ||
| AMZN - IWF | 74% Closely correlated | -0.37% | ||
| KLAC - IWF | 73% Closely correlated | +0.50% | ||
More | ||||
PWB and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PWB has been closely correlated with CDNS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 80% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PWB jumps, then CDNS could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PWB | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PWB | 100% | -0.55% | ||
| CDNS - PWB | 80% Closely correlated | +0.25% | ||
| SNPS - PWB | 78% Closely correlated | +1.73% | ||
| META - PWB | 77% Closely correlated | -0.49% | ||
| MCO - PWB | 77% Closely correlated | -1.50% | ||
| HLT - PWB | 75% Closely correlated | -0.86% | ||
More | ||||