IWF | QTR | IWF / QTR | |
Gain YTD | 38.260 | 22.738 | 168% |
Net Assets | 109B | 2.98M | 3,663,866% |
Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
Turnover | 14.00 | 19.43 | 72% |
Yield | 0.58 | 0.49 | 117% |
Fund Existence | 25 years | 3 years | - |
IWF | QTR | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago81% | 3 days ago77% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago76% | 3 days ago75% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago84% | 3 days ago84% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago88% | 3 days ago88% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago90% | 3 days ago81% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago88% | 3 days ago83% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago89% | 24 days ago80% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 10 days ago79% | N/A |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago90% | 3 days ago70% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago90% | 3 days ago83% |
1 Day | |||
---|---|---|---|
ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
KALL | 20.79 | 0.28 | +1.38% |
KraneShares MSCI All China ETF | |||
QCLN | 36.40 | -0.04 | -0.11% |
First Trust NASDAQ® Cln Edge® GrnEngyETF | |||
BMAR | 46.64 | -0.06 | -0.13% |
Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF™ - Mar | |||
RPHS | 10.42 | -0.04 | -0.39% |
Regents Park Hedged Market Strategy ETF | |||
FDVV | 51.11 | -0.24 | -0.47% |
Fidelity High Dividend ETF |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IWF has been closely correlated with CDNS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IWF jumps, then CDNS could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IWF | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
IWF | 100% | -0.34% | ||
CDNS - IWF | 79% Closely correlated | -0.68% | ||
SNPS - IWF | 78% Closely correlated | -1.96% | ||
MSFT - IWF | 77% Closely correlated | +0.64% | ||
AMZN - IWF | 74% Closely correlated | -0.76% | ||
KLAC - IWF | 73% Closely correlated | -0.19% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, QTR has been closely correlated with LRCX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 80% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if QTR jumps, then LRCX could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To QTR | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
QTR | 100% | -3.43% | ||
LRCX - QTR | 80% Closely correlated | -3.35% | ||
KLAC - QTR | 78% Closely correlated | -3.68% | ||
CDNS - QTR | 78% Closely correlated | -3.25% | ||
AMAT - QTR | 77% Closely correlated | -2.87% | ||
SNPS - QTR | 76% Closely correlated | -3.41% | ||
More |