Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
IWF vs SPUS
IWF vs SPUS Comparison
Open Charts IWF vs SPUS
iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF
Price$464.27
Change+$3.41 (+0.74%)
Volume$1.39M
Net Assets120.14B
SP Funds S&P 500 Sharia Industry Ex ETF
Price$50.07
Change+$0.40 (+0.81%)
Volume$715.06K
Net Assets1.77B
IWF vs SPUS Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
IWF vs. SPUS commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IWF is a Hold and SPUS is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IWF has more net assets: 120B vs. SPUS (1.78B). SPUS has a higher annual dividend yield than IWF: SPUS (17.324) vs IWF (15.955). IWF was incepted earlier than SPUS: IWF (26 years) vs SPUS (6 years). IWF (0.18) has a lower expense ratio than SPUS (0.45). SPUS has a higher turnover IWF (13.00) vs IWF (13.00).
| IWF | SPUS | IWF / SPUS | |
| Gain YTD | 15.955 | 17.324 | 92% |
| Net Assets | 120B | 1.78B | 6,761% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.18 | 0.45 | 40% |
| Turnover | 13.00 | 18.00 | 72% |
| Yield | 0.34 | 0.59 | 58% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 6 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| IWF | SPUS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 76% | 1 day ago 70% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 83% | 1 day ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 77% | 1 day ago 76% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 83% | 1 day ago 78% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 77% | 1 day ago 75% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 83% | 1 day ago 80% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 18 days ago 87% | 9 days ago 90% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 77% | 3 days ago 74% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 80% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 88% | 1 day ago 90% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
IWF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IWF has been closely correlated with CDNS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IWF jumps, then CDNS could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IWF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IWF | 100% | +0.74% | ||
| CDNS - IWF | 79% Closely correlated | +1.17% | ||
| SNPS - IWF | 78% Closely correlated | +0.65% | ||
| MSFT - IWF | 77% Closely correlated | -1.35% | ||
| AMZN - IWF | 74% Closely correlated | +0.06% | ||
| KLAC - IWF | 73% Closely correlated | +3.95% | ||
More | ||||
SPUS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SPUS has been closely correlated with TRMB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 80% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SPUS jumps, then TRMB could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SPUS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SPUS | 100% | +0.81% | ||
| TRMB - SPUS | 80% Closely correlated | +0.45% | ||
| EMR - SPUS | 78% Closely correlated | +1.12% | ||
| NVDA - SPUS | 78% Closely correlated | +2.85% | ||
| LRCX - SPUS | 78% Closely correlated | +3.88% | ||
| KLAC - SPUS | 77% Closely correlated | +3.95% | ||
More | ||||