Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
IWF vs SPUS
IWF vs SPUS Comparison
Open Charts IWF vs SPUS
iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF
Price$427.57
Change-$1.15 (-0.27%)
Volume$644.26K
Net Assets112.47B
SP Funds S&P 500 Sharia Industry Ex ETF
Price$45.08
Change-$0.11 (-0.24%)
Volume$327.95K
Net Assets1.36B
IWF vs SPUS Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
IWF vs. SPUS commentary
Jul 12, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IWF is a Buy and SPUS is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IWF has more net assets: 112B vs. SPUS (1.36B). IWF has a higher annual dividend yield than SPUS: IWF (6.690) vs SPUS (5.403). IWF was incepted earlier than SPUS: IWF (25 years) vs SPUS (6 years). IWF (0.19) has a lower expense ratio than SPUS (0.45). SPUS has a higher turnover IWF (12.00) vs IWF (12.00).
| IWF | SPUS | IWF / SPUS | |
| Gain YTD | 6.690 | 5.403 | 124% |
| Net Assets | 112B | 1.36B | 8,254% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.19 | 0.45 | 42% |
| Turnover | 12.00 | 18.00 | 67% |
| Yield | 0.42 | 0.68 | 61% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 6 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| IWF | SPUS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 84% | 1 day ago 67% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 84% | 1 day ago 79% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | 6 days ago 90% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 86% | 1 day ago 80% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 78% | 1 day ago 89% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 87% | 1 day ago 89% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 87% | 3 days ago 89% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 80% | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 85% | 1 day ago 76% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 88% | 1 day ago 89% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
IWF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IWF has been closely correlated with CDNS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IWF jumps, then CDNS could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IWF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IWF | 100% | -0.27% | ||
| CDNS - IWF | 79% Closely correlated | -0.64% | ||
| SNPS - IWF | 78% Closely correlated | -1.22% | ||
| MSFT - IWF | 77% Closely correlated | +0.37% | ||
| AMZN - IWF | 74% Closely correlated | +1.11% | ||
| KLAC - IWF | 73% Closely correlated | -0.44% | ||
More | ||||
SPUS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SPUS has been closely correlated with AMZN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 82% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SPUS jumps, then AMZN could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SPUS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SPUS | 100% | -0.24% | ||
| AMZN - SPUS | 82% Closely correlated | +1.11% | ||
| CDNS - SPUS | 77% Closely correlated | -0.64% | ||
| APH - SPUS | 77% Closely correlated | +0.46% | ||
| SNPS - SPUS | 76% Closely correlated | -1.22% | ||
| LRCX - SPUS | 75% Closely correlated | +0.66% | ||
More | ||||