Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
IWF vs SPUS
IWF vs SPUS Comparison
Open Charts IWF vs SPUS
iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF
Price$407.57
Change+$4.01 (+0.99%)
Volume$991.19K
Net Assets106B
SP Funds S&P 500 Sharia Industry Ex ETF
Price$42.62
Change+$0.36 (+0.85%)
Volume$360.69K
Net Assets1.26B
IWF vs SPUS Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
IWF vs. SPUS commentary
Jun 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IWF is a Buy and SPUS is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IWF has more net assets: 106B vs. SPUS (1.26B). IWF has a higher annual dividend yield than SPUS: IWF (1.600) vs SPUS (-0.408). IWF was incepted earlier than SPUS: IWF (25 years) vs SPUS (5 years). IWF (0.19) has a lower expense ratio than SPUS (0.45). SPUS has a higher turnover IWF (12.00) vs IWF (12.00).
| IWF | SPUS | IWF / SPUS | |
| Gain YTD | 1.600 | -0.408 | -392% |
| Net Assets | 106B | 1.26B | 8,433% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.19 | 0.45 | 42% |
| Turnover | 12.00 | 18.00 | 67% |
| Yield | 0.45 | 0.72 | 62% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 5 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| IWF | SPUS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 78% | 1 day ago 78% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 80% | 1 day ago 69% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago 86% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 83% | 1 day ago 70% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 88% | 1 day ago 89% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 87% | 1 day ago 89% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 87% | 3 days ago 89% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 17 days ago 80% | 17 days ago 76% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 80% | 1 day ago 84% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 88% | 1 day ago 88% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
IWF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IWF has been closely correlated with CDNS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IWF jumps, then CDNS could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IWF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IWF | 100% | +0.99% | ||
| CDNS - IWF | 79% Closely correlated | +0.22% | ||
| SNPS - IWF | 78% Closely correlated | +0.79% | ||
| MSFT - IWF | 77% Closely correlated | +0.58% | ||
| AMZN - IWF | 74% Closely correlated | +2.72% | ||
| KLAC - IWF | 73% Closely correlated | +2.03% | ||
More | ||||
SPUS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SPUS has been closely correlated with AMZN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 82% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SPUS jumps, then AMZN could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SPUS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SPUS | 100% | +0.85% | ||
| AMZN - SPUS | 82% Closely correlated | +2.72% | ||
| APH - SPUS | 77% Closely correlated | +0.91% | ||
| CDNS - SPUS | 77% Closely correlated | +0.22% | ||
| SNPS - SPUS | 76% Closely correlated | +0.79% | ||
| LRCX - SPUS | 75% Closely correlated | +1.70% | ||
More | ||||