Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
IWF vs SXQG
IWF vs SXQG Comparison
Open Charts IWF vs SXQG
iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF
Price$407.57
Change+$4.01 (+0.99%)
Volume$991.19K
Net Assets106B
ETC 6 Meridian Quality Growth ETF
Price$32.47
Change+$0.26 (+0.81%)
Volume$2.53K
Net Assets59.58M
IWF vs SXQG Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
IWF vs. SXQG commentary
Jun 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IWF is a Buy and SXQG is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IWF has more net assets: 106B vs. SXQG (59.6M). SXQG has a higher annual dividend yield than IWF: SXQG (2.894) vs IWF (1.600). IWF was incepted earlier than SXQG: IWF (25 years) vs SXQG (4 years). IWF (0.19) has a lower expense ratio than SXQG (0.70). SXQG has a higher turnover IWF (12.00) vs IWF (12.00).
| IWF | SXQG | IWF / SXQG | |
| Gain YTD | 1.600 | 2.894 | 55% |
| Net Assets | 106B | 59.6M | 177,852% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.19 | 0.70 | 27% |
| Turnover | 12.00 | 74.00 | 16% |
| Yield | 0.45 | 0.08 | 557% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 4 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| IWF | |
|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 78% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 80% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 83% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 88% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 87% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 87% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 17 days ago 80% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 80% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 88% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
IWF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IWF has been closely correlated with CDNS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IWF jumps, then CDNS could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IWF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IWF | 100% | +0.99% | ||
| CDNS - IWF | 79% Closely correlated | +0.22% | ||
| SNPS - IWF | 78% Closely correlated | +0.79% | ||
| MSFT - IWF | 77% Closely correlated | +0.58% | ||
| AMZN - IWF | 74% Closely correlated | +2.72% | ||
| KLAC - IWF | 73% Closely correlated | +2.03% | ||
More | ||||
SXQG and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SXQG has been loosely correlated with EPAC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 63% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SXQG jumps, then EPAC could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SXQG | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SXQG | 100% | +0.79% | ||
| EPAC - SXQG | 63% Loosely correlated | +0.35% | ||
| BKNG - SXQG | 63% Loosely correlated | +0.97% | ||
| TOST - SXQG | 58% Loosely correlated | +2.78% | ||
| ITW - SXQG | 57% Loosely correlated | +0.59% | ||
| HUBS - SXQG | 56% Loosely correlated | +1.13% | ||
More | ||||