Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
IWF vs TMFC
IWF vs TMFC Comparison
Open Charts IWF vs TMFC
iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF
Price$440.86
Change+$0.64 (+0.15%)
Volume$3.56K
Net Assets114.8B
IWF vs TMFC Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
IWF vs. TMFC commentary
Jul 31, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IWF is a Buy and TMFC is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IWF has more net assets: 115B vs. TMFC (1.57B). TMFC (10.146) and IWF (9.846) have matching annual dividend yield . IWF was incepted earlier than TMFC: IWF (25 years) vs TMFC (8 years). IWF (0.19) has a lower expense ratio than TMFC (0.50). TMFC has a higher turnover IWF (12.00) vs IWF (12.00).
| IWF | TMFC | IWF / TMFC | |
| Gain YTD | 9.846 | 10.146 | 97% |
| Net Assets | 115B | 1.57B | 7,348% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.19 | 0.50 | 38% |
| Turnover | 12.00 | 24.00 | 50% |
| Yield | 0.42 | 0.15 | 282% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 8 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| IWF | TMFC | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 74% | 2 days ago 78% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 81% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 82% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 88% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 87% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 87% | 4 days ago 87% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 21 days ago 80% | 21 days ago 79% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 80% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 87% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
IWF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IWF has been closely correlated with CDNS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IWF jumps, then CDNS could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IWF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IWF | 100% | +0.25% | ||
| CDNS - IWF | 79% Closely correlated | +11.17% | ||
| SNPS - IWF | 78% Closely correlated | +1.50% | ||
| MSFT - IWF | 77% Closely correlated | +0.13% | ||
| AMZN - IWF | 74% Closely correlated | -0.35% | ||
| KLAC - IWF | 73% Closely correlated | +0.97% | ||
More | ||||
TMFC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TMFC has been closely correlated with MSFT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 76% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if TMFC jumps, then MSFT could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To TMFC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TMFC | 100% | +0.15% | ||
| MSFT - TMFC | 76% Closely correlated | +0.13% | ||
| SNPS - TMFC | 73% Closely correlated | +1.50% | ||
| AMZN - TMFC | 73% Closely correlated | -0.35% | ||
| LRCX - TMFC | 69% Closely correlated | +0.15% | ||
| GLW - TMFC | 68% Closely correlated | +1.02% | ||
More | ||||