IWO | TMFS | IWO / TMFS | |
Gain YTD | 0.551 | 2.024 | 27% |
Net Assets | 11.8B | 82.3M | 14,338% |
Total Expense Ratio | 0.24 | 0.85 | 28% |
Turnover | 34.00 | 30.00 | 113% |
Yield | 0.80 | 0.00 | - |
Fund Existence | 25 years | 7 years | - |
IWO | TMFS | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago77% | 2 days ago90% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago87% | 2 days ago83% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago90% | 2 days ago90% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago90% | 2 days ago88% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago85% | 2 days ago82% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago84% | 2 days ago83% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago87% | 4 days ago86% |
Declines ODDS (%) | about 1 month ago84% | 2 days ago85% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago82% | 2 days ago85% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago84% | 2 days ago79% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IWO has been loosely correlated with SSD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 59% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if IWO jumps, then SSD could also see price increases.
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TMFS has been closely correlated with HXL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 74% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if TMFS jumps, then HXL could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To TMFS | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
TMFS | 100% | N/A | ||
HXL - TMFS | 74% Closely correlated | -1.23% | ||
GXO - TMFS | 71% Closely correlated | +0.21% | ||
SITM - TMFS | 67% Closely correlated | -1.47% | ||
RXO - TMFS | 67% Closely correlated | -3.69% | ||
HRI - TMFS | 65% Loosely correlated | -4.13% | ||
More |