Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
IWP vs QMOM
IWP vs QMOM Comparison
Open Charts IWP vs QMOM
iShares Russell Mid-Cap Growth ETF
Price$133.38
Change-$1.76 (-1.30%)
Volume$1.7M
Net Assets18.73B
Alpha Architect US Quantitative Momt ETF
Price$62.54
Change+$0.09 (+0.14%)
Volume$8.01K
Net Assets316.77M
IWP vs QMOM Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
IWP vs. QMOM commentary
Jun 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IWP is a Hold and QMOM is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IWP has more net assets: 18.7B vs. QMOM (317M). IWP has a higher annual dividend yield than QMOM: IWP (5.317) vs QMOM (-2.479). IWP was incepted earlier than QMOM: IWP (24 years) vs QMOM (10 years). IWP (0.23) has a lower expense ratio than QMOM (0.29). QMOM has a higher turnover IWP (35.00) vs IWP (35.00).
| IWP | QMOM | IWP / QMOM | |
| Gain YTD | 5.317 | -2.479 | -214% |
| Net Assets | 18.7B | 317M | 5,899% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.23 | 0.29 | 79% |
| Turnover | 35.00 | 363.00 | 10% |
| Yield | 0.37 | 1.46 | 25% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 10 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| IWP | QMOM | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 76% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 81% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 86% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 76% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 81% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 85% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 87% | 9 days ago 88% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 5 days ago 80% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 70% | 2 days ago 73% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 84% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| SQQQ | 22.76 | 0.84 | +3.83% |
| ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ | |||
| CPII | 19.12 | N/A | N/A |
| American Beacon Ionic Inflation Prot ETF | |||
| FLCO | 21.26 | -0.10 | -0.47% |
| Franklin Investment Grade Corporate ETF | |||
| ADME | 46.85 | -0.34 | -0.72% |
| Aptus Drawdown Managed Equity ETF | |||
| EFAD | 42.83 | -0.59 | -1.37% |
| ProShares MSCI EAFE Dividend Growers | |||
IWP and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IWP has been closely correlated with ARES. These tickers have moved in lockstep 83% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IWP jumps, then ARES could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IWP | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IWP | 100% | -1.30% | ||
| ARES - IWP | 83% Closely correlated | -2.49% | ||
| APO - IWP | 81% Closely correlated | -4.34% | ||
| KKR - IWP | 80% Closely correlated | -3.12% | ||
| OWL - IWP | 80% Closely correlated | -2.71% | ||
| MKSI - IWP | 79% Closely correlated | -4.67% | ||
More | ||||
QMOM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, QMOM has been closely correlated with GS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 77% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if QMOM jumps, then GS could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To QMOM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| QMOM | 100% | +0.14% | ||
| GS - QMOM | 77% Closely correlated | -1.85% | ||
| STEP - QMOM | 75% Closely correlated | -3.37% | ||
| EQH - QMOM | 74% Closely correlated | -2.77% | ||
| GEV - QMOM | 73% Closely correlated | -1.89% | ||
| HWM - QMOM | 73% Closely correlated | -0.19% | ||
More | ||||