Ad is loading...
Ad is loading...
IWP vs QMOM
IWP vs QMOM Comparison
Open Charts IWP vs QMOM
iShares Russell Mid-Cap Growth ETF
Price$134.32
Change+$2.03 (+1.53%)
Volume$700
CapitalizationN/A
Alpha Architect US Quantitative Momt ETF
Price$70.72
Change+$0.36 (+0.51%)
Volume$100
CapitalizationN/A
IWP vs QMOM Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
IWP vs. QMOM commentary
Nov 22, 2024
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IWP is a Buy and QMOM is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IWP has more net assets: 17.6B vs. QMOM (294M). QMOM has a higher annual dividend yield than IWP: QMOM (41.126) vs IWP (27.074). IWP was incepted earlier than QMOM: IWP (23 years) vs QMOM (9 years). QMOM has a higher turnover IWP (26.00) vs IWP (26.00).
| IWP | QMOM | IWP / QMOM | |
| Gain YTD | 27.074 | 41.126 | 66% |
| Net Assets | 17.6B | 294M | 5,986% |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Turnover | 26.00 | 193.00 | 13% |
| Yield | 0.47 | 0.74 | 64% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 9 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| IWP | QMOM | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | 2 days ago 80% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 70% | 2 days ago 82% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 85% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 84% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 88% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 87% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 89% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 82% | 8 days ago 79% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 88% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 87% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
IWP and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IWP has been closely correlated with EXP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 72% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IWP jumps, then EXP could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IWP | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IWP | 100% | +1.50% | ||
| EXP - IWP | 72% Closely correlated | +2.94% | ||
| ENTG - IWP | 70% Closely correlated | +5.28% | ||
| KEYS - IWP | 68% Closely correlated | +2.99% | ||
| PTC - IWP | 68% Closely correlated | +2.25% | ||
| HUBB - IWP | 67% Closely correlated | +2.45% | ||
More | ||||
QMOM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, QMOM has been closely correlated with EXP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 73% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if QMOM jumps, then EXP could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To QMOM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| QMOM | 100% | +1.74% | ||
| EXP - QMOM | 73% Closely correlated | +2.94% | ||
| ETN - QMOM | 72% Closely correlated | +2.91% | ||
| KKR - QMOM | 69% Closely correlated | +3.61% | ||
| FIX - QMOM | 69% Closely correlated | +2.88% | ||
| BLDR - QMOM | 67% Closely correlated | +0.62% | ||
More | ||||