IWP | QMOM | IWP / QMOM | |
Gain YTD | 10.481 | -2.753 | -381% |
Net Assets | 20.2B | 335M | 6,030% |
Total Expense Ratio | 0.23 | 0.29 | 79% |
Turnover | 24.00 | 363.00 | 7% |
Yield | 0.37 | 1.41 | 26% |
Fund Existence | 24 years | 10 years | - |
IWP | QMOM | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago76% | 1 day ago87% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago75% | 1 day ago84% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago83% | N/A |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago81% | 1 day ago81% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago86% | 1 day ago81% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago87% | 29 days ago87% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 5 days ago82% | 1 day ago79% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago90% | 1 day ago90% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago86% | 1 day ago82% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IWP has been closely correlated with ARES. These tickers have moved in lockstep 83% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IWP jumps, then ARES could also see price increases.
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, QMOM has been closely correlated with KKR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if QMOM jumps, then KKR could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To QMOM | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
QMOM | 100% | -0.75% | ||
KKR - QMOM | 79% Closely correlated | -0.95% | ||
GS - QMOM | 78% Closely correlated | +0.34% | ||
ARES - QMOM | 78% Closely correlated | -0.26% | ||
APO - QMOM | 77% Closely correlated | -0.19% | ||
HWM - QMOM | 76% Closely correlated | -0.46% | ||
More |