Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
IWP vs QMOM
IWP vs QMOM Comparison
Open Charts IWP vs QMOM
iShares Russell Mid-Cap Growth ETF
Price$134.69
Change+$0.48 (+0.36%)
Volume$2.87K
Net Assets19.31B
Alpha Architect US Quantitative Momt ETF
Price$63.70
Change+$0.81 (+1.29%)
Volume$1.27K
Net Assets327.41M
IWP vs QMOM Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
IWP vs. QMOM commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IWP is a Hold and QMOM is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IWP has more net assets: 19.3B vs. QMOM (327M). IWP has a higher annual dividend yield than QMOM: IWP (6.585) vs QMOM (-1.092). IWP was incepted earlier than QMOM: IWP (24 years) vs QMOM (10 years). IWP (0.23) has a lower expense ratio than QMOM (0.29). QMOM has a higher turnover IWP (24.00) vs IWP (24.00).
| IWP | QMOM | IWP / QMOM | |
| Gain YTD | 6.585 | -1.092 | -603% |
| Net Assets | 19.3B | 327M | 5,902% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.23 | 0.29 | 79% |
| Turnover | 24.00 | 363.00 | 7% |
| Yield | 0.33 | 1.34 | 25% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 10 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| IWP | QMOM | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 89% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 86% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 86% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 81% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 82% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 87% | 10 days ago 86% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 7 days ago 79% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | N/A |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
IWP and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IWP has been closely correlated with ARES. These tickers have moved in lockstep 82% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IWP jumps, then ARES could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
QMOM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, QMOM has been closely correlated with GS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if QMOM jumps, then GS could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To QMOM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| QMOM | 100% | +0.86% | ||
| GS - QMOM | 78% Closely correlated | +1.25% | ||
| ARES - QMOM | 77% Closely correlated | +1.74% | ||
| HWM - QMOM | 76% Closely correlated | +0.42% | ||
| KKR - QMOM | 75% Closely correlated | +2.91% | ||
| ETN - QMOM | 74% Closely correlated | +2.18% | ||
More | ||||