Ad is loading...
IWP vs TMFM
IWP vs TMFM Comparison
Open Charts IWP vs TMFM
iShares Russell Mid-Cap Growth ETF
Price$111.11
Change-$4.44 (-3.84%)
Volume$5.56K
Net Assets14.74B
Motley Fool Mid-Cap Growth ETF
Price$23.84
Change-$0.40 (-1.65%)
Volume$100
Net Assets155.89M
IWP vs TMFM Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
IWP vs. TMFM commentary
Apr 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IWP is a Hold and TMFM is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IWP has more net assets: 14.7B vs. TMFM (156M). TMFM has a higher annual dividend yield than IWP: TMFM (-5.939) vs IWP (-8.762). IWP was incepted earlier than TMFM: IWP (24 years) vs TMFM (11 years). IWP (0.23) has a lower expense ratio than TMFM (0.85). IWP has a higher turnover TMFM (31.00) vs TMFM (31.00).
| IWP | TMFM | IWP / TMFM | |
| Gain YTD | -8.762 | -5.939 | 148% |
| Net Assets | 14.7B | 156M | 9,423% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.23 | 0.85 | 27% |
| Turnover | 35.00 | 31.00 | 113% |
| Yield | 0.42 | 0.08 | 503% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 11 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| IWP | TMFM | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 88% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 79% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 69% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 72% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 78% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 79% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 88% | 9 days ago 80% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 82% | 3 days ago 83% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 88% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 83% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
IWP and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IWP has been closely correlated with APO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 73% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IWP jumps, then APO could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IWP | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IWP | 100% | +10.74% | ||
| APO - IWP | 73% Closely correlated | +16.34% | ||
| EXP - IWP | 72% Closely correlated | +9.35% | ||
| ARES - IWP | 71% Closely correlated | +15.55% | ||
| EQH - IWP | 70% Closely correlated | +12.78% | ||
| SOFI - IWP | 70% Closely correlated | +19.89% | ||
More | ||||
TMFM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TMFM has been loosely correlated with TRU. These tickers have moved in lockstep 63% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if TMFM jumps, then TRU could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To TMFM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TMFM | 100% | +8.97% | ||
| TRU - TMFM | 63% Loosely correlated | +16.92% | ||
| CSL - TMFM | 54% Loosely correlated | +8.02% | ||
| PFGC - TMFM | 54% Loosely correlated | +8.69% | ||
| HRI - TMFM | 53% Loosely correlated | +14.48% | ||
| RXO - TMFM | 52% Loosely correlated | +15.46% | ||
More | ||||