IWSH
Price
$0.19
Change
-$0.04 (-17.39%)
Updated
Sep 22 closing price
Capitalization
3.92M
SRBT
Price
$0.10
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Sep 17 closing price
Capitalization
100.25M
Interact to see
Advertisement

IWSH vs SRBT

Header iconIWSH vs SRBT Comparison
Open Charts IWSH vs SRBTBanner chart's image
Wright Investors' Service Holdings
Price$0.19
Change-$0.04 (-17.39%)
Volume$163
Capitalization3.92M
Shanrong Biotechnology
Price$0.10
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$4.83K
Capitalization100.25M
IWSH vs SRBT Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
IWSH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SRBT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
IWSH vs. SRBT commentary
Sep 26, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IWSH is a Hold and SRBT is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 26, 2025
Stock price -- (IWSH: $0.19 vs. SRBT: $0.10)
Brand notoriety: IWSH and SRBT are both not notable
Both companies represent the Financial Conglomerates industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: IWSH: 2% vs. SRBT: 390%
Market capitalization -- IWSH: $3.92M vs. SRBT: $100.25M
IWSH [@Financial Conglomerates] is valued at $3.92M. SRBT’s [@Financial Conglomerates] market capitalization is $100.25M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Financial Conglomerates] industry ranges from $590.24B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Financial Conglomerates] industry is $173.25M.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

IWSH’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSRBT’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • IWSH’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • SRBT’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both IWSH and SRBT are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

IWSH’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SRBT’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • IWSH’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • SRBT’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both IWSH and SRBT are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

IWSH (@Financial Conglomerates) experienced а -17.39% price change this week, while SRBT (@Financial Conglomerates) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Financial Conglomerates industry was +0.60%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.19%, and the average quarterly price growth was +16.53%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Financial Conglomerates (+0.60% weekly)

Financial conglomerates usually encompass a wide range of financial services including (not necessarily limited to) investment banking, insurance, capital raising/underwriting, trading of financial securities, investment advisory services, wealth management of high net-worth individuals, and retail banking. Think Citigroup, American Express Company, ING Group.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SRBT($100M) has a higher market cap than IWSH($3.92M). SRBT YTD gains are higher at: 4.375 vs. IWSH (-13.636). IWSH has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -1.07M vs. SRBT (-4.77M). SRBT has higher revenues than IWSH: SRBT (1.33M) vs IWSH (0).
IWSHSRBTIWSH / SRBT
Capitalization3.92M100M4%
EBITDA-1.07M-4.77M22%
Gain YTD-13.6364.375-312%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue01.33M-
Total Cash1.86MN/A-
Total DebtN/A1.91M-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
IWSH vs SRBT: Fundamental Ratings
IWSH
SRBT
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
9839
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
69
Overvalued
30
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
97100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4397
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
75n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SRBT's Valuation (30) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for IWSH (69). This means that SRBT’s stock grew somewhat faster than IWSH’s over the last 12 months.

SRBT's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as IWSH (100). This means that SRBT’s stock grew similarly to IWSH’s over the last 12 months.

IWSH's SMR Rating (97) in the null industry is in the same range as SRBT (100). This means that IWSH’s stock grew similarly to SRBT’s over the last 12 months.

IWSH's Price Growth Rating (43) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SRBT (97). This means that IWSH’s stock grew somewhat faster than SRBT’s over the last 12 months.

IWSH's P/E Growth Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as SRBT (100). This means that IWSH’s stock grew similarly to SRBT’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
IWSHSRBT
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
78%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
60%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
69%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
68%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
63%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
79%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
70%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
74%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
47%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
51%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
63%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
77%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
65%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
IWSH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SRBT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MDRSF66.68N/A
N/A
MEDARTIS HOLDING AG
OSAGF59.13N/A
N/A
Osram Licht AG
QTEYF0.25N/A
N/A
Questerre Energy Corp.
FRFLF0.29N/A
N/A
FRNT Financial Inc.
KGFHY7.77-0.03
-0.38%
Kingfisher plc

IWSH and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that IWSH and ABVN have been poorly correlated (+31% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that IWSH and ABVN's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To IWSH
1D Price
Change %
IWSH100%
N/A
ABVN - IWSH
31%
Poorly correlated
-9.09%
SRBT - IWSH
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
WHLT - IWSH
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TGLO - IWSH
3%
Poorly correlated
+23.81%
TCRI - IWSH
2%
Poorly correlated
-2.70%
More

SRBT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SRBT and TCRI have been poorly correlated (+13% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SRBT and TCRI's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SRBT
1D Price
Change %
SRBT100%
N/A
TCRI - SRBT
13%
Poorly correlated
-2.70%
SITS - SRBT
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
IWSH - SRBT
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
WHLT - SRBT
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TGLO - SRBT
3%
Poorly correlated
+23.81%
More