IWSH
Price
$0.15
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jun 27 closing price
Capitalization
2.89M
WHLT
Price
$0.08
Change
-$0.02 (-20.00%)
Updated
Jun 10 closing price
Capitalization
1.43M
Interact to see
Advertisement

IWSH vs WHLT

Header iconIWSH vs WHLT Comparison
Open Charts IWSH vs WHLTBanner chart's image
Wright Investors' Service Holdings
Price$0.15
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$10K
Capitalization2.89M
Chase Packaging
Price$0.08
Change-$0.02 (-20.00%)
Volume$38.5K
Capitalization1.43M
IWSH vs WHLT Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
IWSH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WHLT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
IWSH vs. WHLT commentary
Jul 05, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IWSH is a Hold and WHLT is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 05, 2025
Stock price -- (IWSH: $0.15 vs. WHLT: $0.08)
Brand notoriety: IWSH and WHLT are both not notable
Both companies represent the Financial Conglomerates industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: IWSH: 184% vs. WHLT: 120%
Market capitalization -- IWSH: $2.89M vs. WHLT: $1.43M
IWSH [@Financial Conglomerates] is valued at $2.89M. WHLT’s [@Financial Conglomerates] market capitalization is $1.43M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Financial Conglomerates] industry ranges from $590.24B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Financial Conglomerates] industry is $4.72B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

IWSH’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileWHLT’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • IWSH’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • WHLT’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, WHLT is a better buy in the long-term than IWSH.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

IWSH’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WHLT’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • IWSH’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • WHLT’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, WHLT is a better buy in the short-term than IWSH.

Price Growth

IWSH (@Financial Conglomerates) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while WHLT (@Financial Conglomerates) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Financial Conglomerates industry was -1.49%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.81%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4.69%.

Reported Earning Dates

IWSH is expected to report earnings on May 15, 2025.

WHLT is expected to report earnings on May 13, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Financial Conglomerates (-1.49% weekly)

Financial conglomerates usually encompass a wide range of financial services including (not necessarily limited to) investment banking, insurance, capital raising/underwriting, trading of financial securities, investment advisory services, wealth management of high net-worth individuals, and retail banking. Think Citigroup, American Express Company, ING Group.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IWSH($2.89M) has a higher market cap than WHLT($1.43M). WHLT YTD gains are higher at: 185.714 vs. IWSH (-31.818). WHLT has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -53.86K vs. IWSH (-1.23M). IWSH has more cash in the bank: 3.97M vs. WHLT (432K). IWSH (0) and WHLT (0) have equivalent revenues.
IWSHWHLTIWSH / WHLT
Capitalization2.89M1.43M202%
EBITDA-1.23M-53.86K2,291%
Gain YTD-31.818185.714-17%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash3.97M432K920%
Total Debt53KN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
IWSH vs WHLT: Fundamental Ratings
IWSH
WHLT
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
66
Overvalued
80
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
9694
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6335
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10010
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

IWSH's Valuation (66) in the null industry is in the same range as WHLT (80). This means that IWSH’s stock grew similarly to WHLT’s over the last 12 months.

IWSH's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as WHLT (100). This means that IWSH’s stock grew similarly to WHLT’s over the last 12 months.

WHLT's SMR Rating (94) in the null industry is in the same range as IWSH (96). This means that WHLT’s stock grew similarly to IWSH’s over the last 12 months.

WHLT's Price Growth Rating (35) in the null industry is in the same range as IWSH (63). This means that WHLT’s stock grew similarly to IWSH’s over the last 12 months.

WHLT's P/E Growth Rating (10) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for IWSH (100). This means that WHLT’s stock grew significantly faster than IWSH’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
IWSHWHLT
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
59%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
47%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
51%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
47%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
64%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
34%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
IWSH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WHLT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
WBUY8.340.34
+4.25%
Webuy Global Ltd
NTIC8.280.08
+0.98%
Northern Technologies International Corp
TEO8.95N/A
N/A
Telecom Argentina SA
WBA11.47-0.02
-0.17%
Walgreens Boots Alliance
HKD1.79-0.02
-1.10%
AMTD Digital

WHLT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that WHLT and SPKLU have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that WHLT and SPKLU's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To WHLT
1D Price
Change %
WHLT100%
N/A
SPKLU - WHLT
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
RTGC - WHLT
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SITS - WHLT
12%
Poorly correlated
-13.46%
IWSH - WHLT
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SRBT - WHLT
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More