IXHL
Price
$0.53
Change
-$0.06 (-10.34%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
49.19M
SWDCF
Price
$3.88
Change
-$0.32 (-7.62%)
Updated
Aug 29 closing price
Capitalization
669.75M
Interact to see
Advertisement

IXHL vs SWDCF

Header iconIXHL vs SWDCF Comparison
Open Charts IXHL vs SWDCFBanner chart's image
Incannex Healthcare
Price$0.53
Change-$0.06 (-10.34%)
Volume$51.13M
Capitalization49.19M
SWEDENCARE AB
Price$3.88
Change-$0.32 (-7.62%)
Volume$438
Capitalization669.75M
IXHL vs SWDCF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
IXHL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SWDCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
IXHL vs. SWDCF commentary
Sep 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IXHL is a Hold and SWDCF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 06, 2025
Stock price -- (IXHL: $0.52 vs. SWDCF: $3.88)
Brand notoriety: IXHL and SWDCF are both not notable
IXHL represents the Pharmaceuticals: Generic, while SWDCF is part of the Food: Major Diversified industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: IXHL: 31% vs. SWDCF: 83%
Market capitalization -- IXHL: $49.19M vs. SWDCF: $669.75M
IXHL [@Pharmaceuticals: Generic] is valued at $49.19M. SWDCF’s [@Food: Major Diversified] market capitalization is $669.75M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Pharmaceuticals: Generic] industry ranges from $67.95B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Food: Major Diversified] industry ranges from $241.32B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Pharmaceuticals: Generic] industry is $3.94B. The average market capitalization across the [@Food: Major Diversified] industry is $7.14B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

IXHL’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSWDCF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • IXHL’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • SWDCF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, both IXHL and SWDCF are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

IXHL’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SWDCF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • IXHL’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • SWDCF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, IXHL is a better buy in the short-term than SWDCF.

Price Growth

IXHL (@Pharmaceuticals: Generic) experienced а -20.33% price change this week, while SWDCF (@Food: Major Diversified) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Pharmaceuticals: Generic industry was +0.10%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +12.13%, and the average quarterly price growth was +87.01%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Major Diversified industry was -0.34%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.48%, and the average quarterly price growth was +895.28%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Pharmaceuticals: Generic (+0.10% weekly)

A generic drug contains the same chemical substance as a drug that was originally protected by patents. Generic drugs are generally sold at cheaper price points, compared to name-brand pharmaceuticals, after patents for the more expensive drugs lapse. The generic drug industry has created a major market, thanks to the lower pricing. According to the Center for Justice and Democracy at New York Law School, 80 percent of all drugs prescribed are generic, and generic drugs are chosen 94 percent of the time when they are available. But their manufacturers must be able to prove to the FDA that they can be effective substitutes for the original drugs. Some of the major generic drug makers include Zoetis, Inc., Allergan plc and Mylan N.V.

@Food: Major Diversified (-0.34% weekly)

Companies in this industry usually make a diverse range of agricultural and/or processed food. Some prominent names in this segment are Mondelez International, which makes chocolates, biscuits, cookies etc. The Kraft Heinz Company specializes in ketchups, sauces, fruit drink pouches and many more. General Mills, Inc. sells flour and cereal. Kellogg is famous for its snacks and breakfast cereal. And so on down the line. As more and more consumers are looking for healthier options in food in recent years, several legacy food companies have responded by revamping brands to include organic and no-added-sugar versions, and/or acquiring healthy food firms, and even streamlining operations.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SWDCF($670M) has a higher market cap than IXHL($49.2M). SWDCF YTD gains are higher at: -9.767 vs. IXHL (-75.236). SWDCF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 493M vs. IXHL (-21.34M). SWDCF has more cash in the bank: 124M vs. IXHL (6.71M). IXHL has less debt than SWDCF: IXHL (1.69M) vs SWDCF (1.81B). SWDCF has higher revenues than IXHL: SWDCF (2.6B) vs IXHL (98K).
IXHLSWDCFIXHL / SWDCF
Capitalization49.2M670M7%
EBITDA-21.34M493M-4%
Gain YTD-75.236-9.767770%
P/E RatioN/A89.21-
Revenue98K2.6B0%
Total Cash6.71M124M5%
Total Debt1.69M1.81B0%
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
IXHLSWDCF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
33%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
17%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
46%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
46%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
50%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
43%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
79%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
27%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
IXHL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SWDCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
HYLN1.760.12
+7.32%
Hyliion Holdings Corp
WKRCF30.00N/A
N/A
Wacker Neuson SE
MLSS0.62N/A
-0.55%
Milestone Scientific
PIFYF0.42-0.01
-1.41%
Pine Cliff Energy Ltd.
LYSDY9.35-0.25
-2.60%
Lynas Rare Earths Limited

IXHL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that IXHL and ESPR have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that IXHL and ESPR's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To IXHL
1D Price
Change %
IXHL100%
-9.48%
ESPR - IXHL
23%
Poorly correlated
+5.93%
INM - IXHL
23%
Poorly correlated
+0.96%
NBIX - IXHL
22%
Poorly correlated
+2.64%
HROW - IXHL
22%
Poorly correlated
+2.18%
YCBD - IXHL
20%
Poorly correlated
+1.44%
More

SWDCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SWDCF and OHCFF have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SWDCF and OHCFF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SWDCF
1D Price
Change %
SWDCF100%
N/A
OHCFF - SWDCF
22%
Poorly correlated
-6.47%
CVSI - SWDCF
20%
Poorly correlated
+1.70%
STEK - SWDCF
5%
Poorly correlated
-3.45%
MSTH - SWDCF
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
IXHL - SWDCF
1%
Poorly correlated
-9.48%
More