Advertisement
IXN vs IYW
Which ETF would AI Choose? iShares Global Tech ETF (IXN) vs. iShares U.S. Technology ETF (IYW)
Key Takeaways
- Both funds are passively managed, market-capitalization-weighted technology ETFs from BlackRock's iShares, with nearly identical net expense ratios of 0.37%.
- IXN is global, holding roughly 127 names across developed and emerging markets, while IYW is U.S.-only with roughly 148 holdings.
- IYW is more concentrated at the top: its 10 largest positions represent about 65% of assets versus about 60% for IXN, with heavier weight in NVDA, AAPL, and MSFT.
- IYW carries notable communication services exposure through GOOGL and META, while IXN is a pure information technology sector fund.
- IXN adds global diversification through Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing, Samsung Electronics, ASML, and SK hynix, which IYW excludes.
- Tickeron AI Verdict: IYW is the favored ticker for its stronger U.S. mega-cap momentum and trend consistency.
Introduction
Technology remains the most-watched corner of global equity markets, but not all tech ETFs are built alike. IXN and IYW both target the technology sector at the same 0.37% cost, yet they reflect different philosophies: one invests across the globe, the other concentrates on U.S. innovation. They do not compete directly so much as offer alternative routes toward the same investor goal of broad technology exposure. Comparing their index construction, sector allocation, concentration, and relative positioning helps clarify which structure better suits the current environment.
iShares Global Tech ETF (IXN) Overview
IXN tracks the S&P Global 1200 Information Technology Sector Index, a market-cap-weighted benchmark spanning technology companies listed in developed and emerging markets. The fund holds roughly 127 securities, with a net expense ratio of 0.37% (0.40% gross). Its top holdings include NVDA, AAPL, MSFT, Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company, AVGO, MU, Samsung Electronics, AMD, ASML, and SK hynix.
The portfolio is dominated by large-cap names, with roughly 87% in developed markets and about 14% in emerging markets. By including semiconductor manufacturers such as TSMC, Samsung, ASML, and SK hynix, the fund captures the global supply chain behind the artificial intelligence (AI) build-out. It is a passive, rules-based vehicle that rebalances in line with its index, offering geographic diversification beyond the United States while remaining overwhelmingly technology-oriented.
iShares U.S. Technology ETF (IYW) Overview
IYW tracks the Russell 1000 Technology RIC 22.5/45 Capped Index, which measures the U.S. technology sector and also captures adjacent communication services names. The fund holds roughly 148 securities with a net expense ratio of 0.37%. Its top holdings include NVDA, AAPL, MSFT, META, AMD, AVGO, MU, GOOGL, INTC, and PLTR.
Roughly 91% of the fund sits in the technology sector, with about 8% in communication services through Alphabet and Meta Platforms. The index applies capping rules — no single issuer may exceed 22.5% of weight, and issuers above 4.5% are collectively capped at 45% — designed to temper single-stock concentration. The result is a diversified but top-heavy portfolio of U.S. large-cap technology leaders, weighted toward semiconductors, software, and hardware.
Industry and Thematic Backdrop
Both funds sit at the center of a powerful, multi-year investment theme: the build-out of artificial intelligence infrastructure. Capital spending on data centers, graphics processing units, memory chips, and cloud platforms has driven earnings and flows across the semiconductor and software complex. This dynamic benefits the mega-cap leaders that dominate both ETFs, while memory suppliers such as Micron, Samsung, and SK hynix — all present in IXN — have been central to the AI memory cycle.
The environment also carries risks. Elevated valuations, sensitivity to interest rate expectations, and concentration in a handful of names are shared vulnerabilities. Geopolitical tensions around semiconductor supply chains and export controls add another layer of uncertainty. These catalysts explain why sector exposure and relative positioning matter more than isolated price moves in any single week.
Performance and Positioning Comparison
Over recent market cycles, IYW has tended to reflect pure U.S. mega-cap technology leadership, while IXN has offered a broader but slightly more diversified profile. IYW's heavier allocation to NVDA, AAPL, and MSFT — combined with its Alphabet and Meta exposure — means its returns are closely tied to a small group of U.S. giants. In periods when those leaders rally, IYW can amplify the move.
IXN, by contrast, distributes more weight across the global semiconductor supply chain and carries exposure to non-U.S. names and currencies. This can temper volatility but also introduces foreign-exchange and regional regulatory considerations. For investors prioritizing relative positioning within U.S. innovation, IYW has displayed stronger trend consistency in recent months; for those seeking broader geographic diversification, IXN remains the more balanced choice.
AI Screener
Tickeron's AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization, technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener is designed to surface trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening. Explore the AI Screener to refine your own technology-sector watchlist.
Tickeron AI Verdict
Based on observable structural and trend factors, Tickeron's AI would currently favor IYW over IXN. IYW offers cost parity with IXN, deeper concentration in the U.S. mega-cap leaders that have anchored recent technology momentum, and stronger trend consistency across recent market cycles. Its inclusion of Alphabet and Meta adds exposure to the adjacent AI-application layer, while its capping rules still limit extreme single-stock risk. IXN's global reach and supply-chain diversification remain valuable, but its non-U.S. and currency exposure introduces incremental complexity. In the current environment, the probabilistic edge leans toward IYW.
Disclaimer
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IXN is a Hold and IYW is a Hold.
Momentum Indicator for IXN turns negative, indicating new downward trend
IXN saw its Momentum Indicator move below the 0 level on October 30, 2026. This is an indication that the stock could be shifting in to a new downward move. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or exploring put options. Tickeron's A.I.dvisor looked at 80 similar instances where the indicator turned negative. In 72 of the 80 cases, the stock moved further down in the following days. The odds of a decline are at 90%.
Technical Analysis (Indicators)
Bearish Trend Analysis
The Moving Average Convergence Divergence Histogram (MACD) for IXN turned negative on October 12, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is set to turn lower in the coming weeks. Traders may want to sell the stock or buy put options. Tickeron's A.I.dvisor looked at 50 similar instances when the indicator turned negative. In 43 of the 50 cases the stock turned lower in the days that followed. This puts the odds of success at 86%.
IXN moved below its 50-day moving average on October 29, 2026 date and that indicates a change from an upward trend to a downward trend.
The 10-day moving average for IXN crossed bearishly below the 50-day moving average on October 21, 2026. This indicates that the trend has shifted lower and could be considered a sell signal. In 15 of 17 past instances when the 10-day crossed below the 50-day, the stock continued to move higher over the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 88%.
Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where IXN declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 80%.
The Aroon Indicator for IXN entered a downward trend on November 13, 2026. This could indicate a strong downward move is ahead for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options.
Bullish Trend Analysis
The RSI Indicator points to a transition from a downward trend to an upward trend -- in cases where IXN's RSI Oscillator exited the oversold zone, 23 of 23 resulted in an increase in price. Tickeron's analysis proposes that the odds of a continued upward trend are 90%.
The Stochastic Oscillator suggests the stock price trend may be in a reversal from a downward trend to an upward trend. 52 of 59 cases where IXN's Stochastic Oscillator exited the oversold zone resulted in an increase in price. Tickeron's analysis proposes that the odds of a continued upward trend are 88%.
Following a +6.04% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where IXN advanced for three days, in 321 of 370 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 87%.
IXN may jump back above the lower band and head toward the middle band. Traders may consider buying the stock or exploring call options.
IYW's Indicator enters downward trend
The Aroon Indicator for IYW entered a downward trend on November 13, 2026. Tickeron's A.I.dvisor identified a pattern where the AroonDown red line was above 70 while the AroonUp green line was below 30 for three straight days. This could indicate a strong downward move is ahead for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options. A.I.dvisor looked at 139 similar instances where the Aroon Indicator formed such a pattern. In 128 of the 139 cases the stock moved lower. This puts the odds of a downward move at 90%.
Technical Analysis (Indicators)
Bearish Trend Analysis
The Momentum Indicator moved below the 0 level on October 14, 2026. You may want to consider selling the stock, shorting the stock, or exploring put options on IYW as a result. In 65 of 83 cases where the Momentum Indicator fell below 0, the stock fell further within the subsequent month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 78%.
The Moving Average Convergence Divergence Histogram (MACD) for IYW turned negative on October 12, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is set to turn lower in the coming weeks. Traders may want to sell the stock or buy put options. Tickeron's A.I.dvisor looked at 50 similar instances when the indicator turned negative. In 40 of the 50 cases the stock turned lower in the days that followed. This puts the odds of success at 80%.
IYW moved below its 50-day moving average on October 29, 2026 date and that indicates a change from an upward trend to a downward trend.
The 10-day moving average for IYW crossed bearishly below the 50-day moving average on October 23, 2026. This indicates that the trend has shifted lower and could be considered a sell signal. In 13 of 16 past instances when the 10-day crossed below the 50-day, the stock continued to move higher over the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 81%.
Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where IYW declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 84%.
Bullish Trend Analysis
The RSI Oscillator points to a transition from a downward trend to an upward trend -- in cases where IYW's RSI Oscillator exited the oversold zone, 22 of 23 resulted in an increase in price. Tickeron's analysis proposes that the odds of a continued upward trend are 90%.
The Stochastic Oscillator suggests the stock price trend may be in a reversal from a downward trend to an upward trend. 44 of 54 cases where IYW's Stochastic Oscillator exited the oversold zone resulted in an increase in price. Tickeron's analysis proposes that the odds of a continued upward trend are 81%.
Following a +4.41% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where IYW advanced for three days, in 322 of 371 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 87%.
IYW may jump back above the lower band and head toward the middle band. Traders may consider buying the stock or exploring call options.
| IXN | IYW | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 81% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 78% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 86% | 4 days ago 80% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 87% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 88% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 87% | 6 days ago 87% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 84% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 89% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 90% |
Advertisement
IXN and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IXN has been closely correlated with STM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 85% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IXN jumps, then STM could also see price increases.
IYW and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IYW has been closely correlated with ONTO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 71% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IYW jumps, then ONTO could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IYW | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IYW | 100% | -1.32% | ||
| ONTO - IYW | 71% Closely correlated | -2.89% | ||
| Q - IYW | 70% Closely correlated | -3.53% | ||
| COHR - IYW | 68% Closely correlated | -6.00% | ||
| MKSI - IYW | 65% Loosely correlated | -2.64% | ||
| GLW - IYW | 63% Loosely correlated | -4.31% | ||
More | ||||
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| NBOS | 28.28 | 0.06 | +0.21% |
| Neuberger Option Strategy ETF (NBOS) | |||
| FEZ | 67.17 | 0.09 | +0.13% |
| State Street SPDR EURO STOXX 50 ETF (FEZ) | |||
| EDGH | 31.96 | -0.02 | -0.06% |
| 3EDGE Dynamic Hard Assets ETF (EDGH) | |||
| EPSB | 26.78 | -0.05 | -0.18% |
| Harbor Smid Cap Core ETF | |||
| JULP | 33.13 | -0.09 | -0.27% |
| PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - July (JULP) | |||