In the surging technology sector, fueled by artificial intelligence (AI) advancements and semiconductor demand, investors often weigh global versus U.S.-focused exposure. The iShares Global Tech ETF (IXN) and iShares U.S. Technology ETF (IYW) provide targeted access to tech equities but differ structurally: IXN spans worldwide companies, capturing international chipmakers essential to AI supply chains, while IYW concentrates on leading U.S. innovators. This ETF comparison highlights their exposure profiles, costs, and positioning amid sector rotation toward AI infrastructure and cloud computing, helping investors align strategies with risk tolerance and geographic preferences in a dynamic market environment.
The iShares Global Tech ETF (IXN) is a passive fund seeking to track the S&P Global 1200 Information Technology 4.5/22.5/45 Capped Index, which includes global equities classified in the technology sector. It holds approximately 127 stocks, emphasizing diversification across semiconductors, hardware, and software. Top holdings typically include NVDA (around 14%), AAPL (11%), MSFT (9%), AVGO (5%), and Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company (4%). Sector allocations feature semiconductors and equipment at about 47%, technology hardware at 28%, and software/services at 24%. With a 0.39% expense ratio, IXN rebalances periodically to enforce caps, limiting any single issuer to 4.5% initially and group caps at 22.5%/45%. Its global scope distinguishes it for investors seeking broad tech exposure beyond U.S. borders.
The iShares U.S. Technology ETF (IYW) passively tracks the Russell 1000 Technology RIC 22.5/45 Capped Index, focusing on U.S. technology equities. It comprises around 139 holdings, with top positions led by NVDA (17%), AAPL (14%), GOOGL (7%), GOOG (6%), and MSFT (4%). Key sectors include semiconductors (41%), software/services (21%), tech hardware (20%), and media/entertainment (17%). The expense ratio stands at 0.38%, with quarterly rebalancing to maintain caps. IYW's U.S.-centric structure suits those prioritizing domestic leaders in AI, cloud, and software, offering high liquidity and concentration in mega-cap drivers.
The technology sector remains a cornerstone of equity markets, propelled by AI adoption, data center expansion, and semiconductor innovation. Capital flows have concentrated in AI-enabling infrastructure, with semiconductors benefiting from surging demand for advanced chips. Macro drivers like lower interest rates support growth stocks, while geopolitical tensions highlight supply chain diversification. Regulatory scrutiny on big tech persists, alongside opportunities in cloud computing and edge AI. Both ETFs are positioned amid these catalysts, with risks from valuation stretches, export controls on chips, and potential sector rotation if economic slowdowns emerge. Recent market cycles underscore tech's resilience, driven by earnings from top holdings.
In recent market cycles, both IXN and IYW have advanced alongside technology's rally, powered by AI momentum and robust earnings from semiconductor and software leaders. IYW's heavier weighting in U.S. mega-caps like NVDA and AAPL has amplified gains during U.S.-led uptrends but introduced higher volatility tied to domestic sentiment. IXN's global mix, including exposure to Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company and ASML Holding NV (ASML), provides relative stability amid U.S.-China trade dynamics, though it trails slightly in bull phases dominated by American firms. Divergence emerges in sector rotation: IYW shines in software-driven cycles, while IXN benefits from international chip recovery. Volatility profiles reflect IYW's concentration versus IXN's broader footprint.
Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that empowers traders and investors to filter thousands of assets using technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-generated signals. Customizable filters span industries, market capitalization, technical indicators like RSI and moving averages, price patterns such as breakouts, and performance metrics including relative strength. This efficiency surpasses manual screening, uncovering trade ideas, trending opportunities, and breakout candidates in sectors like technology. Explore it today to refine your ETF and stock scans with precision.
Tickeron’s AI currently leans toward IYW with moderate conviction (65% probability), favoring its marginally lower expense ratio, superior liquidity from larger scale, and concentrated exposure to U.S. tech leaders driving AI profitability. While IXN's global diversification hedges regional risks, IYW's alignment with domestic momentum and trend consistency positions it stronger in prevailing sector flows. This assessment weighs structural efficiency, holdings overlap, and risk-adjusted profiles, not as advice.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
| IXN | IYW | IXN / IYW | |
| Gain YTD | 34.484 | 23.474 | 147% |
| Net Assets | 9.17B | 24.7B | 37% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.39 | 0.38 | 103% |
| Turnover | 45.00 | 7.00 | 643% |
| Yield | 0.24 | 0.11 | 220% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 26 years | - |
| IXN | IYW | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 83% | 1 day ago 87% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 81% | 1 day ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 89% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 84% | 1 day ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 89% | 1 day ago 89% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 88% | 1 day ago 89% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 88% | 4 days ago 88% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 84% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 85% | 1 day ago 76% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 90% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| MMIN | 24.10 | -0.03 | -0.12% |
| NYLI MacKay Muni Insured ETF | |||
| FTMU | 7.88 | -0.02 | -0.19% |
| Franklin Municipal Income ETF | |||
| EIRL | 77.17 | -0.46 | -0.59% |
| iShares MSCI Ireland ETF | |||
| QVMT | 67.97 | -0.41 | -0.59% |
| Invesco S&P S&P 500 Concentrated QVM ETF | |||
| SUSA | 151.63 | -1.74 | -1.13% |
| iShares ESG Optimized MSCI USA ETF | |||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IXN has been closely correlated with STM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 85% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IXN jumps, then STM could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IXN | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IXN | 100% | +0.01% | ||
| STM - IXN | 85% Closely correlated | -1.60% | ||
| NVDA - IXN | 75% Closely correlated | -1.33% | ||
| LRCX - IXN | 75% Closely correlated | +1.38% | ||
| MU - IXN | 71% Closely correlated | +2.20% | ||
| AMAT - IXN | 70% Closely correlated | +4.35% | ||
More | ||||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IYW has been closely correlated with NVDA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 76% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IYW jumps, then NVDA could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IYW | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IYW | 100% | -0.68% | ||
| NVDA - IYW | 76% Closely correlated | -1.33% | ||
| LRCX - IYW | 71% Closely correlated | +1.38% | ||
| AMD - IYW | 68% Closely correlated | +1.02% | ||
| AVGO - IYW | 68% Closely correlated | +4.30% | ||
| MU - IYW | 66% Closely correlated | +2.20% | ||
More | ||||