IXN and SMH represent compelling options for technology sector exposure amid surging demand for semiconductors fueled by artificial intelligence, cloud computing, and data centers. While both ETFs overlap in chip-related holdings like NVDA, IXN provides broader global technology diversification across software, hardware, and services, whereas SMH delivers targeted access to the semiconductor industry. Investors compare them to balance comprehensive tech participation against concentrated bets on chipmakers driving innovation. This ETF comparison highlights structural differences, sector exposure, and relative positioning in an environment of sector rotation toward high-growth areas.
The iShares Global Tech ETF (IXN) is a passive fund tracking the S&P Global 1200 Information Technology 4.5/22.5/45 Capped Index, which measures global equities in the information technology sector with caps to limit concentration (4.5% single stock, 22.5% top five, 45% top ten). It holds 127 stocks, providing diversified exposure. Top holdings include NVDA (14.11%), AAPL (12.41%), MSFT (9.15%), AVGO (4.89%), and TSM (4.42%). Sector allocations emphasize semiconductors & equipment (45.31%), tech hardware & equipment (28.64%), and software & services (25.82%). The expense ratio is 0.39%, with strong liquidity (30-day median bid/ask spread of 0.12%). Geographically, it's 77% U.S.-focused with international diversification. The index rebalances quarterly to maintain caps.
The VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH) is a passive fund replicating the MVIS US Listed Semiconductor 25 Index, targeting the 25 largest U.S.-exchange-listed semiconductor production and equipment companies, selected by market cap and trading volume. It maintains 26 holdings for concentrated exposure. Top holdings feature NVDA (17.01%), TSM (10.50%), AVGO (7.95%), INTC (7.02%), and AMD (6.17%), with top 10 comprising 71.66%. Sector allocation is 100% information technology (semiconductors). The expense ratio stands at 0.35%. The index applies capping for diversification and rebalances semi-annually, emphasizing liquidity.
The technology sector, particularly semiconductors, thrives on macroeconomic drivers like AI adoption, 5G rollout, and electric vehicle growth. Capital flows concentrate in chipmakers amid supply chain realignments and U.S. CHIPS Act incentives boosting domestic production. Regulatory scrutiny on exports to certain regions adds risks, alongside cyclical demand tied to consumer electronics and enterprise spending. Broader macro shifts, including interest rate expectations, influence valuations, with sector rotation favoring growth-oriented tech over value in recent cycles. Geopolitical tensions impact global supply chains, underscoring semiconductors' critical role.
In recent months, SMH has outperformed IXN, driven by explosive growth in AI chip demand benefiting top holdings like NVDA and TSM. Over longer cycles, SMH's concentration amplifies returns during semiconductor upswings but heightens volatility compared to IXN's broader base, which includes stable software giants like MSFT. IXN shows steadier positioning amid sector rotations, while SMH captures momentum from earnings beats in chip equipment and design. Relative volatility favors IXN for risk-averse investors, though SMH leads in trend consistency during tech rallies.
Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization (market cap), technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener identifies trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening, empowering data-driven decisions across asset classes including ETFs like IXN and SMH. Explore it today to uncover hidden opportunities.
Tickeron’s AI currently favors SMH with moderate conviction (65% probability edge), citing superior cost efficiency, stronger sector momentum in semiconductors, and trend consistency amid AI catalysts, despite higher concentration risk. IXN's diversification offers resilience but trails in recent growth profiles.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
| IXN | SMH | IXN / SMH | |
| Gain YTD | 32.434 | 71.860 | 45% |
| Net Assets | 9.09B | 73.4B | 12% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.39 | 0.35 | 111% |
| Turnover | 45.00 | 12.00 | 375% |
| Yield | 0.24 | 0.18 | 128% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 15 years | - |
| IXN | SMH | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 79% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 82% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 86% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 90% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 88% | 4 days ago 90% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 82% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 75% | 2 days ago 81% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| CPAG | 102.87 | 0.56 | +0.55% |
| F/m Compoundr U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF | |||
| DIHP | 33.56 | -0.01 | -0.04% |
| Dimensional International High Pbly ETF | |||
| PIPE | 29.67 | -0.32 | -1.06% |
| Invesco SteelPath MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF | |||
| DJP | 43.16 | -0.91 | -2.06% |
| iPath® Bloomberg Cmdty TR ETN | |||
| DGP | 128.29 | -9.25 | -6.73% |
| DB Gold Double Long ETN | |||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IXN has been closely correlated with STM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 85% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IXN jumps, then STM could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IXN | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IXN | 100% | -0.34% | ||
| STM - IXN | 85% Closely correlated | -0.81% | ||
| LRCX - IXN | 76% Closely correlated | +0.93% | ||
| NVDA - IXN | 75% Closely correlated | -0.52% | ||
| MU - IXN | 72% Closely correlated | -0.31% | ||
| ASML - IXN | 70% Closely correlated | -0.88% | ||
More | ||||