IXN
Price
$140.63
Change
+$1.73 (+1.25%)
Updated
Jun 25, 03:35 PM (EDT)
Net Assets
9.09B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
SMH
Price
$636.46
Change
+$17.54 (+2.83%)
Updated
Jun 25, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Net Assets
73.41B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

IXN vs SMH

IXN vs SMH Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three

Which ETF would AI Choose? iShares Global Tech ETF (IXN) vs. VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH)

Key Takeaways

  • IXN offers broad global technology exposure with 127 holdings, while SMH provides concentrated U.S.-listed semiconductor focus with just 26 holdings.
  • IXN's top sectors include semiconductors (45%), tech hardware (29%), and software (26%); SMH is 100% semiconductors within information technology.
  • Expense ratios are competitive: IXN at 0.39% vs. SMH at 0.35%, favoring SMH on cost.
  • IXN diversifies geographically (77% U.S., plus Taiwan, Korea, Japan), while SMH emphasizes U.S.-listed firms including ADRs like TSM.
  • SMH exhibits higher volatility due to concentration but stronger momentum from AI-driven chip demand in recent market cycles.
  • IXN suits diversified tech plays; SMH targets high-growth subsector with greater risk-reward profile.

Introduction

IXN and SMH represent compelling options for technology sector exposure amid surging demand for semiconductors fueled by artificial intelligence, cloud computing, and data centers. While both ETFs overlap in chip-related holdings like NVDA, IXN provides broader global technology diversification across software, hardware, and services, whereas SMH delivers targeted access to the semiconductor industry. Investors compare them to balance comprehensive tech participation against concentrated bets on chipmakers driving innovation. This ETF comparison highlights structural differences, sector exposure, and relative positioning in an environment of sector rotation toward high-growth areas.

iShares Global Tech ETF (IXN) Overview

The iShares Global Tech ETF (IXN) is a passive fund tracking the S&P Global 1200 Information Technology 4.5/22.5/45 Capped Index, which measures global equities in the information technology sector with caps to limit concentration (4.5% single stock, 22.5% top five, 45% top ten). It holds 127 stocks, providing diversified exposure. Top holdings include NVDA (14.11%), AAPL (12.41%), MSFT (9.15%), AVGO (4.89%), and TSM (4.42%). Sector allocations emphasize semiconductors & equipment (45.31%), tech hardware & equipment (28.64%), and software & services (25.82%). The expense ratio is 0.39%, with strong liquidity (30-day median bid/ask spread of 0.12%). Geographically, it's 77% U.S.-focused with international diversification. The index rebalances quarterly to maintain caps.

VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH) Overview

The VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH) is a passive fund replicating the MVIS US Listed Semiconductor 25 Index, targeting the 25 largest U.S.-exchange-listed semiconductor production and equipment companies, selected by market cap and trading volume. It maintains 26 holdings for concentrated exposure. Top holdings feature NVDA (17.01%), TSM (10.50%), AVGO (7.95%), INTC (7.02%), and AMD (6.17%), with top 10 comprising 71.66%. Sector allocation is 100% information technology (semiconductors). The expense ratio stands at 0.35%. The index applies capping for diversification and rebalances semi-annually, emphasizing liquidity.

Industry and Thematic Backdrop

The technology sector, particularly semiconductors, thrives on macroeconomic drivers like AI adoption, 5G rollout, and electric vehicle growth. Capital flows concentrate in chipmakers amid supply chain realignments and U.S. CHIPS Act incentives boosting domestic production. Regulatory scrutiny on exports to certain regions adds risks, alongside cyclical demand tied to consumer electronics and enterprise spending. Broader macro shifts, including interest rate expectations, influence valuations, with sector rotation favoring growth-oriented tech over value in recent cycles. Geopolitical tensions impact global supply chains, underscoring semiconductors' critical role.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

In recent months, SMH has outperformed IXN, driven by explosive growth in AI chip demand benefiting top holdings like NVDA and TSM. Over longer cycles, SMH's concentration amplifies returns during semiconductor upswings but heightens volatility compared to IXN's broader base, which includes stable software giants like MSFT. IXN shows steadier positioning amid sector rotations, while SMH captures momentum from earnings beats in chip equipment and design. Relative volatility favors IXN for risk-averse investors, though SMH leads in trend consistency during tech rallies.

AI Screener

Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization (market cap), technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener identifies trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening, empowering data-driven decisions across asset classes including ETFs like IXN and SMH. Explore it today to uncover hidden opportunities.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Tickeron’s AI currently favors SMH with moderate conviction (65% probability edge), citing superior cost efficiency, stronger sector momentum in semiconductors, and trend consistency amid AI catalysts, despite higher concentration risk. IXN's diversification offers resilience but trails in recent growth profiles.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
IXN vs. SMH commentary
Jun 25, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IXN is a Hold and SMH is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SMH has more net assets: 73.4B vs. IXN (9.09B). SMH has a higher annual dividend yield than IXN: SMH (71.860) vs IXN (32.434). IXN was incepted earlier than SMH: IXN (25 years) vs SMH (15 years). SMH (0.35) has a lower expense ratio than IXN (0.39). IXN has a higher turnover SMH (12.00) vs SMH (12.00).
IXNSMHIXN / SMH
Gain YTD32.43471.86045%
Net Assets9.09B73.4B12%
Total Expense Ratio0.390.35111%
Turnover45.0012.00375%
Yield0.240.18128%
Fund Existence25 years15 years-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
IXNSMH
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
88%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
IXN
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
SMH
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CPAG102.870.56
+0.55%
F/m Compoundr U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF
DIHP33.56-0.01
-0.04%
Dimensional International High Pbly ETF
PIPE29.67-0.32
-1.06%
Invesco SteelPath MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF
DJP43.16-0.91
-2.06%
iPath® Bloomberg Cmdty TR ETN
DGP128.29-9.25
-6.73%
DB Gold Double Long ETN

IXN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IXN has been closely correlated with STM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 85% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IXN jumps, then STM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To IXN
1D Price
Change %
IXN100%
-0.34%
STM - IXN
85%
Closely correlated
-0.81%
LRCX - IXN
76%
Closely correlated
+0.93%
NVDA - IXN
75%
Closely correlated
-0.52%
MU - IXN
72%
Closely correlated
-0.31%
ASML - IXN
70%
Closely correlated
-0.88%
More