IYK
Price
$73.65
Change
+$0.75 (+1.03%)
Updated
Jun 26 closing price
Net Assets
1.37B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
XLP
Price
$84.71
Change
+$0.77 (+0.92%)
Updated
Jun 26 closing price
Net Assets
14.09B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

IYK vs XLP

IYK vs XLP Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three

Which ETF would AI Choose? iShares U.S. Consumer Staples ETF (IYK) vs. State Street Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLP)

Key Takeaways

  • IYK tracks the broader Russell 1000 Consumer Staples RIC 22.5/45 Capped Index with 54 holdings, offering exposure primarily to consumer staples (around 85%) plus healthcare (11%) and basic materials (3%), providing modest diversification beyond pure staples.
  • XLP follows the S&P Consumer Staples Select Sector Index with 36 holdings, delivering concentrated 100% exposure to consumer staples sub-industries like retail (34%), beverages (20%), and household products (16%).
  • XLP boasts a significantly lower expense ratio of 0.08% compared to IYK's 0.38%, enhancing long-term cost efficiency for investors.
  • Top holdings overlap in names like PG, KO, and PM, but XLP uniquely emphasizes large retailers such as WMT (12%) and COST (9%).
  • XLP exhibits higher liquidity with over $14 billion in assets under management (AUM), versus IYK's approximately $1.4 billion, supporting tighter spreads and easier trading.
  • Both passive ETFs suit defensive strategies, but XLP's purer sector focus and lower costs position it for targeted staples exposure amid sector rotations.

Introduction

Amid ongoing sector rotations toward defensive assets in recent market cycles, the iShares U.S. Consumer Staples ETF (IYK) and State Street Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLP) offer compelling exposure to the resilient consumer staples sector. These ETFs do not compete directly but provide alternative strategies within staples: IYK delivers broader U.S. market coverage with incidental healthcare diversification, while XLP targets large-cap S&P 500 staples constituents for precise sector purity. Investors seeking stability from essential goods producers—food, beverages, and household products—compare these funds to align with goals like income generation or volatility mitigation in uncertain environments marked by inflation pressures and policy shifts.

iShares U.S. Consumer Staples ETF (IYK) Overview

The iShares U.S. Consumer Staples ETF (IYK) is a passively managed fund that seeks to track the Russell 1000 Consumer Staples RIC 22.5/45 Capped Index (USD), which measures U.S. equities in the consumer staples sector with caps to limit concentration (22.5% per holding, 45% top five). It holds 54 stocks, providing broader mid- and large-cap exposure. Top holdings include PG (13.6%), KO (12.2%), PM (10.7%), PEP (8.7%), and MO (4.8%), with the top 10 comprising about 67% of assets. Sector allocations tilt heavily to consumer defensive (85%), with healthcare (11%) and basic materials (3%), reflecting inclusions like CVS and MCK. The expense ratio is 0.38%, and as a standard open-end ETF launched in 2000, it rebalances per index methodology, emphasizing diversified access to producers of food, beverages, and household goods.

State Street Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLP) Overview

The State Street Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLP) passively tracks the Consumer Staples Select Sector Index, a subset of the S&P 500 representing staples companies. With 36 holdings, it focuses on large-cap leaders. Top holdings are WMT (12.1%), COST (9.4%), PG (7.2%), KO (6.4%), and PM (5.6%), accounting for roughly 63% of the portfolio. Industry breakdown: consumer staples distribution & retail (34%), beverages (20%), food products (17%), household products (16%), tobacco (10%), and personal care (4%)—100% staples exposure. The expense ratio stands at a low 0.08%. Launched in 1998 as an open-end ETF on NYSE Arca, it rebalances quarterly per S&P methodology, ideal for targeted bets on essential goods retailers and manufacturers.

Industry and Thematic Backdrop

The consumer staples sector, encompassing producers of non-cyclical goods like food, beverages, and personal care items, thrives on steady demand resilience amid economic bifurcation and inflation. Recent cycles show capital flows into defensives as investors rotate from high-valuation tech amid policy uncertainties, trade tensions, and moderating growth. Catalysts include fiscal stimulus boosting disposable income, easing input costs from lower commodities, and consumer preference for value-oriented essentials. Risks involve competitive pricing pressures, supply chain disruptions, and regulatory scrutiny on tobacco or packaging. Macro drivers like interest rate paths favor low-beta staples, while trends toward health-focused products and retail efficiency (e.g., via scale at WMT) support positioning. Both ETFs benefit from this defensive appeal in volatile environments.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

In recent weeks and months, consumer staples have seen rotation inflows, with the sector rallying amid broader market de-risking from tech overvaluation. XLP, with its large-cap retail emphasis, has captured upside from strong performers like WMT and COST, showing tighter tracking to S&P 500 defensives. IYK's broader scope and healthcare buffer (e.g., MCK) add relative stability but dilute pure staples momentum during retail-led surges. Volatility profiles align closely (betas around 0.5-0.6), though XLP's scale enhances liquidity. Performance ties to earnings resilience in beverages and household goods, interest rate sensitivity favoring low-debt names, and sector tailwinds from consumer value-seeking.

AI Screener

Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization (market cap), technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener identifies trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening, empowering data-driven decisions across asset classes. Explore it today to uncover hidden gems in sectors like consumer staples.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Tickeron’s AI currently favors XLP with higher probability due to its superior cost efficiency (0.08% expense ratio), larger scale for superior liquidity, purer staples alignment capturing retail momentum, and consistent trend performance in defensive rotations. IYK suits broader diversification needs, but XLP's structural edges enhance relative positioning amid macro uncertainties.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
IYK vs. XLP commentary
Jun 28, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IYK is a Buy and XLP is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
XLP has more net assets: 14.1B vs. IYK (1.37B). IYK has a higher annual dividend yield than XLP: IYK (11.195) vs XLP (10.425). IYK was incepted earlier than XLP: IYK (26 years) vs XLP (28 years). XLP (0.08) has a lower expense ratio than IYK (0.38). IYK has a higher turnover XLP (8.00) vs XLP (8.00).
IYKXLPIYK / XLP
Gain YTD11.19510.425107%
Net Assets1.37B14.1B10%
Total Expense Ratio0.380.08475%
Turnover9.008.00113%
Yield2.662.62101%
Fund Existence26 years28 years-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
IYKXLP
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
87%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
81%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
76%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
IYK
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
XLP
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
LAMYX27.080.05
+0.20%
Lord Abbett Dividend Growth I
FFICX67.060.02
+0.03%
American Fds Invmt Co of Amer F-3
PHLAX37.32N/A
N/A
PGIM Jennison Health Sciences A
GASFX29.83N/A
N/A
Hennessy Gas Utility Investor
LFFLX16.38N/A
N/A
Lord Abbett Focused Large Cap Value F

IYK and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IYK has been closely correlated with CL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 74% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IYK jumps, then CL could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To IYK
1D Price
Change %
IYK100%
+1.03%
CL - IYK
74%
Closely correlated
+1.11%
PG - IYK
73%
Closely correlated
+0.35%
PEP - IYK
66%
Closely correlated
+1.34%
MDLZ - IYK
66%
Loosely correlated
-0.67%
CHD - IYK
62%
Loosely correlated
+1.46%
More

XLP and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, XLP has been closely correlated with CL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 72% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if XLP jumps, then CL could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To XLP
1D Price
Change %
XLP100%
+0.92%
CL - XLP
72%
Closely correlated
+1.11%
PG - XLP
71%
Closely correlated
+0.35%
MDLZ - XLP
67%
Closely correlated
-0.67%
PEP - XLP
64%
Loosely correlated
+1.34%
CHD - XLP
64%
Loosely correlated
+1.46%
More