Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
IYSCX vs NAESX
IYSCX vs NAESX Comparison
Open Charts IYSCX vs NAESX
Macquarie Smid Cap Core Fund
Price$12.59
Change+$0.09 (+0.72%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets366.25M
Vanguard Small Cap Index I
Price$117.25
Change+$1.42 (+1.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets153.28B
IYSCX vs NAESX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
IYSCX vs. NAESX commentary
Jul 23, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IYSCX is a StrongBuy and NAESX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NAESX has more cash in the bank: 153B vs. IYSCX (366M). NAESX pays higher dividends than IYSCX: NAESX (1.28) vs IYSCX (0.14). IYSCX was incepted earlier than NAESX: IYSCX (22 years) vs NAESX (65 years). IYSCX (2.02) is less costly to investors than NAESX (0.17). IYSCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 16.00 vs. NAESX (13.00). IYSCX has a lower initial minimum investment than NAESX: IYSCX (1000) vs NAESX (3000). NAESX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.82 vs. IYSCX (5.54). NAESX return over 5 years is better than : 61.32 vs. IYSCX (-4.62).
| IYSCX | NAESX | IYSCX / NAESX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.89 | 0.17 | 1,112% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.02 | 0.17 | 1,188% |
| Fund Existence | 22 years | 65 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.642 | 0.745 | 86% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 3000 | 33% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 366M | 153B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.14 | 1.28 | 11% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.54 | 6.82 | 81% |
| Returns for 3 years | -4.33 | 30.98 | -14% |
| Returns for 5 years | -4.62 | 61.32 | -8% |
| Returns for 10 years | -17.10 | 110.65 | -15% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement