IYZ vs LBRDA
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IYZ is a Sell and LBRDA is a Sell.
LBRDA | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 6 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 85 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 94 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 38 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 78 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| IYZ | LBRDA | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 78% | 3 days ago 57% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 86% | 3 days ago 62% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 82% | 3 days ago 76% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 86% | 3 days ago 61% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 82% | 3 days ago 64% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 83% | 3 days ago 55% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 85% | 7 days ago 58% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 85% | 3 days ago 61% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 82% | 3 days ago 59% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 87% | 3 days ago 56% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| GTCCX | 22.53 | -0.12 | -0.53% |
| Gabelli Global Content & Connect C | |||
| PIVYX | 40.58 | -0.28 | -0.69% |
| Putnam International Capital Opp Y | |||
| GATMX | 12.61 | -0.10 | -0.79% |
| Goldman Sachs International T/M Eq A | |||
| PAEEX | 21.96 | -0.24 | -1.08% |
| Putnam Dynamic Asset Allocation Gr R6 | |||
| VEXPX | 124.97 | -2.21 | -1.74% |
| Vanguard Explorer Inv | |||
IYZ and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IYZ has been closely correlated with CMCSA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 71% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IYZ jumps, then CMCSA could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IYZ | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IYZ | 100% | -1.21% | ||
| CMCSA - IYZ | 71% Closely correlated | -1.38% | ||
| CSCO - IYZ | 61% Loosely correlated | -0.79% | ||
| CHTR - IYZ | 57% Loosely correlated | -1.19% | ||
| LBRDK - IYZ | 57% Loosely correlated | -1.56% | ||
| LBRDA - IYZ | 56% Loosely correlated | -1.85% | ||
More | ||||
LBRDA and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LBRDA has been closely correlated with LBRDK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 100% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if LBRDA jumps, then LBRDK could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LBRDA | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LBRDA | 100% | -1.85% | ||
| LBRDK - LBRDA | 100% Closely correlated | -1.56% | ||
| CHTR - LBRDA | 76% Closely correlated | -1.19% | ||
| LBRDB - LBRDA | 66% Closely correlated | -1.11% | ||
| CMCSA - LBRDA | 54% Loosely correlated | -1.38% | ||
| CABO - LBRDA | 54% Loosely correlated | -2.47% | ||
More | ||||