Charter Communications (CHTR) and Liberty Broadband (LBRDA) operate in the interconnected broadband and cable sector, where LBRDA holds a significant stake in CHTR, making them a natural pair for comparison. Investors seeking exposure to U.S. connectivity services—amid rising demand for high-speed internet and challenges from streaming disruption—may find value in evaluating their relative performance, valuations, and risks. Traders focused on telecom momentum or holding company discounts will appreciate insights into recent sentiment shifts and head-to-head metrics in today's competitive market environment. This analysis highlights key contrasts to inform stock comparison decisions.
Charter Communications (CHTR), operating as Spectrum, is a leading U.S. provider of broadband internet, video, mobile, and voice services to residential and business customers. With a market capitalization of approximately $23 billion and trailing twelve-month (TTM) revenue of $55 billion, it serves millions through its fixed-wireless infrastructure.
In recent weeks, CHTR stock exhibited heightened volatility, declining sharply by over 20% following first-quarter 2026 results that missed earnings per share (EPS) expectations at $9.17 versus $9.97 forecasted, despite a modest revenue beat. Subscriber losses in video services, attributed to cord-cutting and competition from fiber and satellite alternatives, weighed on sentiment. Trading near its 52-week low around $180 after a high of $437, the stock's low price-to-earnings (PE) ratio of about 5 reflects bargain pricing but underscores risks from broadband market saturation.
Liberty Broadband (LBRDA) is a holding company primarily invested in Charter Communications, owning a substantial minority stake that positions it as a leveraged play on CHTR's performance. Its streamlined focus, with minimal other operations, results in a smaller market cap around $8 billion and sensitivity to its key asset's fortunes.
Recent market activity has seen LBRDA maintain relative stability, trading around $57 within a 52-week range of $42 to $96, with modest gains amid broader sector pressures. Lacking direct operational updates, its movement closely tracks CHTR, though year-to-date returns of about 7% lag the operating company's pre-earnings gains. Investor sentiment reflects the discount to its CHTR holdings, balanced against concentration risks in telecom exposure.
Tickeron's Trending AI Robots page curates the top performers from its library of over 350 AI trading bots, each scanning thousands of tickers across stocks, ETFs, and crypto using diverse strategies like trend following, swing trading, and dip-buying on timeframes from 5 minutes to 60 days. Only the most suitable for prevailing conditions—boasting annualized returns from +15% to +170%, win rates of 48% to 88%, and profit factors up to 6.94—earn a spot among the featured 25. These bots employ technical analysis (TA), fundamental analysis (FA), or hybrids, with risk controls like take-profit/stop-loss corridors (e.g., TP 3%/SL 2%), and cater to low-to-high volatility preferences. Explore them for real-time signals and copy-trading options tailored to current markets.
CHTR and LBRDA share sector exposure in broadband connectivity but differ in business models: CHTR drives revenue through direct services, while LBRDA leverages its stake for passive gains. Growth drivers for CHTR include mobile expansion and business broadband, contrasting LBRDA's dependence on investee performance.
Recent momentum favors neither decisively, with CHTR's post-earnings drop amplifying risks from customer churn, while LBRDA offers a valuation discount but amplified volatility. Risk factors overlap in cord-cutting and competition, yet CHTR's scale provides diversification via advertising and enterprise services. Market sentiment tilts toward CHTR for operational resilience, though LBRDA appeals for pure-play upside.
Tickeron's AI currently favors CHTR over LBRDA, citing superior long-term trend consistency, larger scale, and recovery catalysts from broadband demand despite recent volatility. While LBRDA provides efficient exposure, CHTR's direct positioning offers probabilistic edge in stabilizing markets.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full Disclaimers and Limitations.
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CHTR’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileLBRDA’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CHTR’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LBRDA’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
CHTR (@Major Telecommunications) experienced а -9.28% price change this week, while LBRDA (@Major Telecommunications) price change was -9.05% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Major Telecommunications industry was -4.38%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.12%, and the average quarterly price growth was +5.86%.
CHTR is expected to report earnings on Jul 24, 2026.
LBRDA is expected to report earnings on Jul 31, 2026.
Major telecommunications include companies that make communication possible across the globe – by providing voice and data transmission via multiple channels such as phone or the Internet, through airwaves or cables, through wires or wirelessly. The ease with which we connect with anyone, anywhere in the world is thanks in large part to the infrastructure created by the telecom industry. Some major telecom players include AT&T Inc., Verizon Communications Inc. and Nippon Telegraph and Telephone Corporation.
| CHTR | LBRDA | CHTR / LBRDA | |
| Capitalization | 15.5B | 4.25B | 365% |
| EBITDA | 21.2B | -3.16B | -671% |
| Gain YTD | -39.531 | -38.815 | 102% |
| P/E Ratio | 3.42 | 6.44 | 53% |
| Revenue | 54.6B | 0 | - |
| Total Cash | 517M | 51M | 1,014% |
| Total Debt | 96.8B | 2.57B | 3,774% |
CHTR | LBRDA | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 8 | 7 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 61 Fair valued | 86 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 33 | 99 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 65 | 87 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 97 | 95 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | 90 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
CHTR's Valuation (61) in the Cable Or Satellite TV industry is in the same range as LBRDA (86) in the Specialty Telecommunications industry. This means that CHTR’s stock grew similarly to LBRDA’s over the last 12 months.
CHTR's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Cable Or Satellite TV industry is in the same range as LBRDA (100) in the Specialty Telecommunications industry. This means that CHTR’s stock grew similarly to LBRDA’s over the last 12 months.
CHTR's SMR Rating (33) in the Cable Or Satellite TV industry is significantly better than the same rating for LBRDA (99) in the Specialty Telecommunications industry. This means that CHTR’s stock grew significantly faster than LBRDA’s over the last 12 months.
CHTR's Price Growth Rating (65) in the Cable Or Satellite TV industry is in the same range as LBRDA (87) in the Specialty Telecommunications industry. This means that CHTR’s stock grew similarly to LBRDA’s over the last 12 months.
LBRDA's P/E Growth Rating (95) in the Specialty Telecommunications industry is in the same range as CHTR (97) in the Cable Or Satellite TV industry. This means that LBRDA’s stock grew similarly to CHTR’s over the last 12 months.
| CHTR | LBRDA | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 63% | 3 days ago 59% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 77% | 3 days ago 74% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 77% | 3 days ago 86% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 53% | 3 days ago 54% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 74% | 3 days ago 71% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 75% | 3 days ago 71% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 58% | 9 days ago 57% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 74% | 3 days ago 72% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 60% | 3 days ago 74% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 71% | 3 days ago 69% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| OVLH | 41.89 | 0.35 | +0.84% |
| Overlay Shares Hedged Lrg Cp Eq ETF | |||
| SMN | 19.73 | 0.12 | +0.60% |
| ProShares UltraShort Materials | |||
| SMRI | 40.77 | 0.22 | +0.54% |
| Bushido Capital US Equity ETF | |||
| EVYM | 50.88 | 0.23 | +0.45% |
| Eaton Vance High Income Municipal ETF | |||
| FLOT | 51.00 | 0.04 | +0.08% |
| iShares Floating Rate Bond ETF | |||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CHTR has been closely correlated with LBRDK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 100% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CHTR jumps, then LBRDK could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CHTR | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CHTR | 100% | -4.37% | ||
| LBRDK - CHTR | 100% Closely correlated | -4.05% | ||
| LBRDA - CHTR | 100% Closely correlated | -4.18% | ||
| CMCSA - CHTR | 66% Loosely correlated | -1.15% | ||
| CABO - CHTR | 48% Loosely correlated | -4.83% | ||
| LBRDP - CHTR | 42% Loosely correlated | +0.67% | ||
More | ||||