Ad is loading...
JABAX vs RLBFX
JABAX vs RLBFX Comparison
Open Charts JABAX vs RLBFX
Janus Henderson Balanced T
Price$45.30
Change+$0.08 (+0.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets25.07B
American Funds American Balanced R5
Price$34.44
Change+$0.05 (+0.15%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets234.05B
JABAX vs RLBFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
JABAX vs. RLBFX commentary
May 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is JABAX is a Buy and RLBFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBFX has more cash in the bank: 234B vs. JABAX (25.1B). RLBFX pays higher dividends than JABAX: RLBFX (2.26) vs JABAX (1.88). JABAX was incepted earlier than RLBFX: JABAX (33 years) vs RLBFX (23 years). JABAX (0.82) is less costly to investors than RLBFX (0.29). JABAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 76.00 vs. RLBFX (44.00). RLBFX has a lower initial minimum investment than JABAX: RLBFX (250) vs JABAX (2500). RLBFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.06 vs. JABAX (3.56). JABAX (40.36) and RLBFX (38.47) have equivalent 5 years return.
| JABAX | RLBFX | JABAX / RLBFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.82 | 0.29 | 283% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.82 | 0.29 | 283% |
| Fund Existence | 33 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.347 | 0.528 | -66% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 25.1B | 234B | 11% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.88 | 2.26 | 83% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.56 | 5.06 | 70% |
| Returns for 3 years | 23.39 | 22.75 | 103% |
| Returns for 5 years | 40.36 | 38.47 | 105% |
| Returns for 10 years | 69.88 | 53.33 | 131% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...