Ad is loading...
JAMF
Price
$14.84
Change
-$0.47 (-3.07%)
Updated
Nov 15 closing price
106 days until earnings call
SQNXF
Price
$34.66
Change
-$2.39 (-6.45%)
Updated
Nov 15 closing price
Ad is loading...

JAMF vs SQNXF

Header iconJAMF vs SQNXF Comparison
Open Charts JAMF vs SQNXFBanner chart's image
Jamf Holding
Price$14.84
Change-$0.47 (-3.07%)
Volume$573.69K
CapitalizationN/A
Square Enix
Price$34.66
Change-$2.39 (-6.45%)
Volume$150
CapitalizationN/A
JAMF vs SQNXF Comparison Chart
Loading...
JAMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
JAMF vs. SQNXF commentary
Nov 18, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is JAMF is a Sell and SQNXF is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 18, 2024
Stock price -- (JAMF: $14.84 vs. SQNXF: $34.66)
Brand notoriety: JAMF and SQNXF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Packaged Software industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: JAMF: 133% vs. SQNXF: 11%
Market capitalization -- JAMF: $2.31B vs. SQNXF: $5.6B
JAMF [@Packaged Software] is valued at $2.31B. SQNXF’s [@Packaged Software] market capitalization is $5.6B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $3.15T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $11.39B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

JAMF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSQNXF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • JAMF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • SQNXF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, SQNXF is a better buy in the long-term than JAMF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

JAMF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • JAMF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.

Price Growth

JAMF (@Packaged Software) experienced а -7.60% price change this week, while SQNXF (@Packaged Software) price change was -7.80% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was -1.01%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.04%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.33%.

Reported Earning Dates

JAMF is expected to report earnings on Mar 04, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Packaged Software (-1.01% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SQNXF($5.6B) has a higher market cap than JAMF($2.31B). SQNXF YTD gains are higher at: -4.052 vs. JAMF (-17.829). SQNXF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 75.2B vs. JAMF (-64.95M). SQNXF has more cash in the bank: 176B vs. JAMF (244M). JAMF has less debt than SQNXF: JAMF (367M) vs SQNXF (7.96B). SQNXF has higher revenues than JAMF: SQNXF (347B) vs JAMF (561M).
JAMFSQNXFJAMF / SQNXF
Capitalization2.31B5.6B41%
EBITDA-64.95M75.2B-0%
Gain YTD-17.829-4.052440%
P/E RatioN/A15.48-
Revenue561M347B0%
Total Cash244M176B0%
Total Debt367M7.96B5%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
JAMF vs SQNXF: Fundamental Ratings
JAMF
SQNXF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
31
Undervalued
48
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
9147
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
8056
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1006
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
4265

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

JAMF's Valuation (31) in the null industry is in the same range as SQNXF (48). This means that JAMF’s stock grew similarly to SQNXF’s over the last 12 months.

JAMF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as SQNXF (100). This means that JAMF’s stock grew similarly to SQNXF’s over the last 12 months.

SQNXF's SMR Rating (47) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for JAMF (91). This means that SQNXF’s stock grew somewhat faster than JAMF’s over the last 12 months.

SQNXF's Price Growth Rating (56) in the null industry is in the same range as JAMF (80). This means that SQNXF’s stock grew similarly to JAMF’s over the last 12 months.

SQNXF's P/E Growth Rating (6) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for JAMF (100). This means that SQNXF’s stock grew significantly faster than JAMF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
JAMF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
82%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
73%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
81%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
77%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
74%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
73%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
65%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
77%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
72%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
75%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
JAMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FVDFX38.22-0.04
-0.10%
Fidelity Value Discovery
MSSLX7.71-0.03
-0.39%
Morgan Stanley Inst Inception L
GSIYX21.67-0.16
-0.73%
Goldman Sachs GQG Ptnrs Intl Opps R6
VEOAX25.76-0.22
-0.85%
Vanguard Global Environmental Opp StkAdm
GTTRX41.42-0.43
-1.03%
Goldman Sachs Small Cp Val Insghts R

JAMF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, JAMF has been loosely correlated with COIN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 66% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if JAMF jumps, then COIN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To JAMF
1D Price
Change %
JAMF100%
-3.07%
COIN - JAMF
66%
Loosely correlated
+9.69%
CLSK - JAMF
54%
Loosely correlated
+0.36%
RIOT - JAMF
53%
Loosely correlated
+4.26%
PD - JAMF
50%
Loosely correlated
-4.85%
COMP - JAMF
50%
Loosely correlated
-4.24%
More

SQNXF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SQNXF has been loosely correlated with SQNNY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 43% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SQNXF jumps, then SQNNY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SQNXF
1D Price
Change %
SQNXF100%
-6.46%
SQNNY - SQNXF
43%
Loosely correlated
N/A
FREKF - SQNXF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NXLLF - SQNXF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
JAMF - SQNXF
20%
Poorly correlated
-3.07%
TCYSF - SQNXF
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More