It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
JANL’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileNPEHF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
JANL’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NPEHF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).
JANL (@Air Freight/Couriers) experienced а -1.23% price change this week, while NPEHF (@Air Freight/Couriers) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Air Freight/Couriers industry was -1.91%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.04%, and the average quarterly price growth was +10.58%.
JANL is expected to report earnings on Feb 03, 2023.
The Air Freight/Couriers industry operates air transportation and recurring delivery services. This includes companies offering same-day deliveries, scheduled delivery and logistical services. The proliferation of e-commerce/online retail with a growing emphasis on faster delivery has expanded opportunities for this industry, and induced more competition. United Parcel Service, Inc., FedEx Corporation and Expeditors International of Washington, Inc. are some of the major companies in this industry.
JANL | NPEHF | JANL / NPEHF | |
Capitalization | 32M | 5.25B | 1% |
EBITDA | 864K | 303B | 0% |
Gain YTD | 60.000 | -5.777 | -1,039% |
P/E Ratio | 4.89 | 6.74 | 73% |
Revenue | 255M | 2.55T | 0% |
Total Cash | 2.31M | 310B | 0% |
Total Debt | 37.1M | 632B | 0% |
JANL | ||
---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 95 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 88 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 40 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 86 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 61 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 14 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
JANL | NPEHF | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago48% | N/A |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago62% | 2 days ago40% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago63% | N/A |
MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago62% | N/A |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago57% | 2 days ago22% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago56% | 2 days ago20% |
Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago50% |
1 Day | |||
---|---|---|---|
MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
ACARX | 33.72 | N/A | N/A |
Alger Capital Appreciation Instl R | |||
MVGIX | 16.79 | -0.07 | -0.42% |
MFS Low Volatility Global Equity I | |||
LEXCX | 63.37 | -0.36 | -0.56% |
Voya Corporate Leaders Trust B | |||
JVLIX | 26.10 | -0.21 | -0.80% |
JHancock Disciplined Value I | |||
FEMAX | 11.73 | -0.15 | -1.26% |
First Eagle U.S. SMID Cap Opportunity A |
A.I.dvisor tells us that JANL and NPEHF have been poorly correlated (+20% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that JANL and NPEHF's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To JANL | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
JANL | 100% | +12.52% | ||
NPEHF - JANL | 20% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
KHNGF - JANL | 8% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
DSDVF - JANL | 6% Poorly correlated | -0.90% | ||
DPSTF - JANL | 4% Poorly correlated | -3.14% | ||
CTTOF - JANL | 4% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor tells us that NPEHF and JANL have been poorly correlated (+20% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NPEHF and JANL's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To NPEHF | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
NPEHF | 100% | N/A | ||
JANL - NPEHF | 20% Poorly correlated | +12.52% | ||
CRGO - NPEHF | 16% Poorly correlated | +2.09% | ||
TTNMF - NPEHF | 1% Poorly correlated | -1.20% | ||
QUBHF - NPEHF | 1% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
DHLGY - NPEHF | -2% Poorly correlated | -2.78% | ||
More |