Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
JBAWX vs RLBAX
JBAWX vs RLBAX Comparison
Open Charts JBAWX vs RLBAX
JHancock Balanced R6
Price$31.06
Change+$0.15 (+0.49%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.97B
American Funds American Balanced R1
Price$37.34
Change+$0.13 (+0.35%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets255.46B
JBAWX vs RLBAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
JBAWX vs. RLBAX commentary
Aug 30, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is JBAWX is a StrongBuy and RLBAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBAX has more cash in the bank: 255B vs. JBAWX (5.97B). JBAWX pays higher dividends than RLBAX: JBAWX (1.92) vs RLBAX (1.17). JBAWX was incepted earlier than RLBAX: JBAWX (14 years) vs RLBAX (23 years). RLBAX (1.31) is less costly to investors than JBAWX (0.63). JBAWX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 67.00 vs. RLBAX (44.00). RLBAX has a lower initial minimum investment than JBAWX: RLBAX (250) vs JBAWX (1000000). JBAWX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.36 vs. RLBAX (7.23). JBAWX return over 5 years is better than : 42.70 vs. RLBAX (33.12).
| JBAWX | RLBAX | JBAWX / RLBAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 1.31 | 47% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.31 | 48% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.149 | 10.068 | 91% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.97B | 255B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.92 | 1.17 | 165% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.36 | 7.23 | 130% |
| Returns for 3 years | 39.64 | 32.96 | 120% |
| Returns for 5 years | 42.70 | 33.12 | 129% |
| Returns for 10 years | 96.03 | 66.60 | 144% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement