Ad is loading...
JBAXY
Price
$12.16
Change
+$0.11 (+0.91%)
Updated
Nov 15 closing price
Earnings call today
LBGUF
Price
$53.11
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Oct 16 closing price
Ad is loading...

JBAXY vs LBGUF

Header iconJBAXY vs LBGUF Comparison
Open Charts JBAXY vs LBGUFBanner chart's image
Julius Baer Group
Price$12.16
Change+$0.11 (+0.91%)
Volume$96.72K
CapitalizationN/A
LE Lundbergfoeretagen AB
Price$53.11
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$352
CapitalizationN/A
JBAXY vs LBGUF Comparison Chart
Loading...
JBAXY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
JBAXY vs. LBGUF commentary
Nov 18, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is JBAXY is a StrongBuy and LBGUF is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 18, 2024
Stock price -- (JBAXY: $12.16 vs. LBGUF: $53.11)
Brand notoriety: JBAXY and LBGUF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: JBAXY: 87% vs. LBGUF: 76%
Market capitalization -- JBAXY: $14.48B vs. LBGUF: $10.92B
JBAXY [@Investment Managers] is valued at $14.48B. LBGUF’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $10.92B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $124.17B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $5.91B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

JBAXY’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileLBGUF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • JBAXY’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • LBGUF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, JBAXY is a better buy in the long-term than LBGUF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

JBAXY’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • JBAXY’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.

Price Growth

JBAXY (@Investment Managers) experienced а -3.95% price change this week, while LBGUF (@Investment Managers) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was +0.33%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.27%, and the average quarterly price growth was +5.88%.

Reported Earning Dates

JBAXY is expected to report earnings on Jan 30, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (+0.33% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
JBAXY($14.5B) has a higher market cap than LBGUF($10.9B). LBGUF has higher P/E ratio than JBAXY: LBGUF (16.81) vs JBAXY (13.25). JBAXY YTD gains are higher at: 14.729 vs. LBGUF (10.636). LBGUF has higher revenues than JBAXY: LBGUF (32.6B) vs JBAXY (3.87B).
JBAXYLBGUFJBAXY / LBGUF
Capitalization14.5B10.9B133%
EBITDAN/A13.5B-
Gain YTD14.72910.636138%
P/E Ratio13.2516.8179%
Revenue3.87B32.6B12%
Total CashN/A2.79B-
Total DebtN/A20.8B-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
JBAXY vs LBGUF: Fundamental Ratings
JBAXY
LBGUF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
18
Undervalued
34
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
34100
SMR RATING
1..100
1297
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5448
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
655
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a30

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

JBAXY's Valuation (18) in the null industry is in the same range as LBGUF (34). This means that JBAXY’s stock grew similarly to LBGUF’s over the last 12 months.

JBAXY's Profit vs Risk Rating (34) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for LBGUF (100). This means that JBAXY’s stock grew significantly faster than LBGUF’s over the last 12 months.

JBAXY's SMR Rating (12) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for LBGUF (97). This means that JBAXY’s stock grew significantly faster than LBGUF’s over the last 12 months.

LBGUF's Price Growth Rating (48) in the null industry is in the same range as JBAXY (54). This means that LBGUF’s stock grew similarly to JBAXY’s over the last 12 months.

JBAXY's P/E Growth Rating (6) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LBGUF (55). This means that JBAXY’s stock grew somewhat faster than LBGUF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
JBAXY
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
56%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
54%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
42%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
59%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
55%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
63%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
59%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 19 days ago
69%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
55%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
JBAXY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TOVYX17.40-0.07
-0.40%
American Beacon EAM Int Small Cap Y
MPLAX13.17-0.06
-0.45%
Praxis International Index A
CMRCX9.87-0.08
-0.80%
Calamos Merger Arbitrage C
FISVX27.03-0.25
-0.92%
Fidelity Small Cap Value Index
JOHAX23.37-0.30
-1.27%
JOHCM International Select Investor

JBAXY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, JBAXY has been loosely correlated with APAM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 35% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if JBAXY jumps, then APAM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To JBAXY
1D Price
Change %
JBAXY100%
+0.91%
APAM - JBAXY
35%
Loosely correlated
-0.66%
BAM - JBAXY
35%
Loosely correlated
-0.54%
BLK - JBAXY
34%
Loosely correlated
+0.03%
JHG - JBAXY
32%
Poorly correlated
-2.54%
HLNE - JBAXY
32%
Poorly correlated
-0.67%
More

LBGUF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LBGUF has been loosely correlated with GMPXF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 42% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LBGUF jumps, then GMPXF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LBGUF
1D Price
Change %
LBGUF100%
N/A
GMPXF - LBGUF
42%
Loosely correlated
+0.58%
KKR - LBGUF
22%
Poorly correlated
-0.33%
BAM - LBGUF
21%
Poorly correlated
-0.54%
JBARF - LBGUF
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
JBAXY - LBGUF
1%
Poorly correlated
+0.91%
More