Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
JBFRX vs PDBAX
JBFRX vs PDBAX Comparison
Open Charts JBFRX vs PDBAX
JHancock Bond R4
Price$13.43
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets26.22B
PGIM Total Return Bond A
Price$11.93
Change-$0.01 (-0.08%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets48.84B
JBFRX vs PDBAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
JBFRX vs. PDBAX commentary
Jul 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is JBFRX is a Hold and PDBAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PDBAX has more cash in the bank: 48.8B vs. JBFRX (26.2B). PDBAX (4.34) and JBFRX (4.31) have matching dividends . JBFRX was incepted earlier than PDBAX: JBFRX (10 years) vs PDBAX (31 years). PDBAX (0.77) is less costly to investors than JBFRX (0.72). JBFRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 133.00 vs. PDBAX (113.00). JBFRX has a lower initial minimum investment than PDBAX: JBFRX (0) vs PDBAX (1000). PDBAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.70 vs. JBFRX (3.50). JBFRX return over 5 years is better than : -3.26 vs. PDBAX (-3.70).
| JBFRX | PDBAX | JBFRX / PDBAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.61 | 0.76 | 80% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.72 | 0.77 | 94% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 31 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.944 | 2.895 | 102% |
| Front Load | N/A | 3% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 26.2B | 48.8B | 54% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.31 | 4.34 | 99% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.50 | 3.70 | 95% |
| Returns for 3 years | 8.89 | 9.03 | 99% |
| Returns for 5 years | -3.26 | -3.70 | 88% |
| Returns for 10 years | 21.19 | 17.26 | 123% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers