Ad is loading...
JBFRX vs PDBZX
JBFRX vs PDBZX Comparison
Open Charts JBFRX vs PDBZX
JHancock Bond R4
Price$13.44
Change+$0.06 (+0.45%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets26.1B
PGIM Total Return Bond Z
Price$11.93
Change+$0.04 (+0.34%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets48.72B
JBFRX vs PDBZX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
JBFRX vs. PDBZX commentary
Apr 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is JBFRX is a Hold and PDBZX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PDBZX has more cash in the bank: 48.7B vs. JBFRX (26.1B). PDBZX pays higher dividends than JBFRX: PDBZX (4.64) vs JBFRX (4.29). JBFRX was incepted earlier than PDBZX: JBFRX (10 years) vs PDBZX (29 years). JBFRX (0.72) is less costly to investors than PDBZX (0.50). JBFRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 133.00 vs. PDBZX (113.00). JBFRX (0) and PDBZX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. PDBZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.68 vs. JBFRX (7.13). PDBZX return over 5 years is better than : 1.46 vs. JBFRX (-0.58).
| JBFRX | PDBZX | JBFRX / PDBZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.61 | 0.49 | 124% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.72 | 0.50 | 144% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 29 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.463 | 1.738 | 84% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 26.1B | 48.7B | 54% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.29 | 4.64 | 92% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.13 | 7.68 | 93% |
| Returns for 3 years | 3.96 | 4.94 | 80% |
| Returns for 5 years | -0.58 | 1.46 | -39% |
| Returns for 10 years | 17.88 | 16.63 | 108% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...