Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
JBFRX vs PDBZX
JBFRX vs PDBZX Comparison
Open Charts JBFRX vs PDBZX
JHancock Bond R4
Price$13.40
Change-$0.03 (-0.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets26.23B
PGIM Total Return Bond Z
Price$11.88
Change-$0.03 (-0.25%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets48.85B
JBFRX vs PDBZX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
JBFRX vs. PDBZX commentary
Jun 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is JBFRX is a Hold and PDBZX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PDBZX has more cash in the bank: 48.8B vs. JBFRX (26.2B). PDBZX pays higher dividends than JBFRX: PDBZX (4.69) vs JBFRX (4.36). JBFRX was incepted earlier than PDBZX: JBFRX (10 years) vs PDBZX (29 years). JBFRX (0.72) is less costly to investors than PDBZX (0.50). JBFRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 133.00 vs. PDBZX (113.00). JBFRX (0) and PDBZX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. PDBZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.03 vs. JBFRX (4.49). PDBZX return over 5 years is better than : -0.30 vs. JBFRX (-1.72).
| JBFRX | PDBZX | JBFRX / PDBZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.61 | 0.49 | 124% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.72 | 0.50 | 144% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 29 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.576 | 2.713 | 95% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 26.2B | 48.8B | 54% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.36 | 4.69 | 93% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.49 | 5.03 | 89% |
| Returns for 3 years | 6.86 | 7.97 | 86% |
| Returns for 5 years | -1.72 | -0.30 | 578% |
| Returns for 10 years | 20.60 | 20.16 | 102% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement