Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
JBFRX vs PDBZX
JBFRX vs PDBZX Comparison
Open Charts JBFRX vs PDBZX
JHancock Bond R4
Price$13.54
Change-$0.03 (-0.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets26.44B
PGIM Total Return Bond Z
Price$11.99
Change-$0.02 (-0.17%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets49.22B
JBFRX vs PDBZX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
JBFRX vs. PDBZX commentary
Jun 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is JBFRX is a Hold and PDBZX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PDBZX has more cash in the bank: 49.2B vs. JBFRX (26.4B). PDBZX pays higher dividends than JBFRX: PDBZX (4.65) vs JBFRX (4.36). JBFRX was incepted earlier than PDBZX: JBFRX (10 years) vs PDBZX (29 years). JBFRX (0.72) is less costly to investors than PDBZX (0.50). JBFRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 133.00 vs. PDBZX (113.00). JBFRX (0) and PDBZX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. PDBZX (5.91) and JBFRX (5.66) have marching annual gain over last year. PDBZX return over 5 years is better than : -0.62 vs. JBFRX (-1.47).
| JBFRX | PDBZX | JBFRX / PDBZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.61 | 0.49 | 124% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.72 | 0.50 | 144% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 29 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.646 | 3.576 | 102% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 26.4B | 49.2B | 54% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.36 | 4.65 | 94% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.66 | 5.91 | 96% |
| Returns for 3 years | 11.10 | 11.60 | 96% |
| Returns for 5 years | -1.47 | -0.62 | 236% |
| Returns for 10 years | 22.02 | 21.09 | 104% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers